Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 74 days, net +26,351. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,876–61,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Oct 2026, 15:41
56,361
-54
19 Oct 2026, 17:37
56,415
-173
18 Oct 2026, 16:19
56,588
-338
17 Oct 2026, 14:47
56,926
-369
16 Oct 2026, 16:28
57,295
+506
15 Oct 2026, 19:18
56,789
+823
14 Oct 2026, 21:55
55,966
+1,220
13 Oct 2026, 16:58
54,746
+5,357
9 Oct 2026, 23:22
49,389
+4,853
5 Oct 2026, 20:18
44,536
+1,270
30 Sept 2026, 06:38
43,266
+12,407
18 Sept 2026, 02:19
30,859
+1,375
15 Sept 2026, 22:18
29,484
+558
14 Sept 2026, 05:01
28,926
+148
12 Sept 2026, 10:15
28,778
+131
10 Sept 2026, 07:41
28,647
+412
7 Sept 2026, 03:18
28,235
-667
4 Sept 2026, 08:19
28,902
-491
2 Sept 2026, 20:57
29,393
-27
1 Sept 2026, 18:45
29,420
first reading
Engagement
403 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.36%
avg views ÷ 56,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,710
370 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.433%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
370
of 403 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 341 of 370 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
403 (15 July 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
1,742,613
Reactions total
7,361
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,520
Videos
≈1,240
Links
≈3,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
11,646 reactions across 371 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.31% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
618
5.31%
🏆
441
3.79%
🙏
435
3.74%
🍌
382
3.28%
🤷
379
3.25%
💋
372
3.19%
🥰
355
3.05%
🦄
342
2.94%
👏
339
2.91%
🔥
320
2.75%
🤝
319
2.74%
😁
318
2.73%
👍
315
2.70%
⚡
310
2.66%
🎄
309
2.65%
😇
299
2.57%
🌭
297
2.55%
🎃
288
2.47%
🤣
282
2.42%
💯
276
2.37%
34 further kinds
4,650
39.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 371 of the 403 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 403 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.23%
13 of 403 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,920
over 13 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,500
over 390 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 403 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Dennis Oppenheim’s *Device to Root Out Evil* is a traditional rural church turned upside down, its spire pointing into the ground. Made of steel and glass, the conceptual artwork suggests faith taking aim at the forces of evil beneath our feet. Its provocative design has sparked heated debate, and the sculpture has moved between several locations, including Vancouver, Calgary and Mallorca.
SimplyLogo
Josephine Wall
“The Tree of Dreams” (“The Wish Tree”), 2003
A man traveling the world fell asleep beneath a tree that granted wishes, unaware of its power. Hungry when he woke, he wished for food—and a feast appeared. Then he wished for water, and a jug appeared beside him.
Wondering where they came from, he feared evil spirits were mocking him. Terrifying creatures appeared. “They’re going to kill me!” he thought.…
Art mystery: Where did the million-dollar whale go?
In 1873, the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge acquired Hendrick van Anthonissen’s 1641 Dutch landscape, View of Scheveningen Sands. A crowd stared at nothing on the wintry beach, puzzling art historians for over 140 years.
In 2014, conservator Shan Kuang uncovered the answer while removing old varnish: a figure standing on a gigantic whale washed ashore. In the 18t…
🤣 LOLzone — Scroll. Cackle. Repeat.
💀 Fresh memes from the crypto trenches
🎭 Degens. Moonboys. Maxis. Bears.
📉 Market dumps? We still post bangers.
🧠 Humor IQ = 1000+ satoshis If you know — you lol.
👉 https://t.me/gigglehive #ad
A true two-sided masterpiece from Tudor England!
The front of this British pendant, made around 1600, dazzles with vivid enamel and a crowned heart. Turn it over, and a hidden riot of colour comes into view: the entire reverse is set with rubies, emeralds and amethysts. Maximalism worn close to the body—a luxury meant for the wearer alone.
SimplyLogo
Alexander Romm
“Road into Autumn,” 2017
In Frankfurt,
roses bloom in the cold.
In Moscow,
patterns begin to flower
on the windowpanes.
Our Buick races
through crimson dusk,
through the twilight
of precise German minutes.
Through the blaze of maples
and the music of pines,
through the delicate lace
of yellow birches.
I’m exiled to these wonders
for a little while,
like a satellite
among the sorrowful fields of sta…
Autumn in St. Petersburg, captured by photographer Eduard Gordeev, comes to life like a painting. He creates this impressionistic effect through delicate work with soft, diffused light, a veil of mist, and deep reflections on the water. The images feel less like photographs than canvases by Levitan or Polenov, with every leaf a brushstroke.
SimplyLogo
Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio)
*Judith Beheading Holofernes*, 1599
The painting depicts the Old Testament story of Judith, a young Jewish widow who saved her city from siege by getting the Assyrian commander Holofernes drunk and then beheading him. His severed head became irrefutable proof of her victory.
SimplyLogo
Magical cityscapes by the talented artist Evgeny Lushpin. Whether at dusk, in the evening, or at night, he captures the warmth of glowing windows and streetlights, along with reflections shimmering on wet pavement.
SimplyLogo
Did you know Michelangelo hid an anatomical atlas in his 1511–1512 fresco *The Creation of Adam*?
The cloak and angels around God resemble a human brain. Researchers argue this was no coincidence: they’ve identified the cerebellum, pituitary gland and optic nerve, while the green sash aligns with the vertebral artery. Michelangelo studied anatomy by dissecting corpses, yet the hidden details went unnoticed for nearl…
🎉6🍓4🎄4👌4👏4🍌3🍾3💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 403 posts we hold for @simplylogo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@simplylogo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@goodzver named in 2 posts, 8 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SimplyLogo” (@simplylogo), 56,361 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simplylogo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.