National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 62 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,479–30,034 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 18:37
29,916
+13
4 Oct 2026, 07:37
29,903
+32
25 Sept 2026, 13:41
29,871
+232
19 Sept 2026, 04:17
29,639
+56
14 Sept 2026, 19:18
29,583
+6
13 Sept 2026, 07:01
29,577
-24
11 Sept 2026, 08:41
29,601
+58
8 Sept 2026, 13:19
29,543
-31
5 Sept 2026, 09:20
29,574
-20
3 Sept 2026, 15:17
29,594
-21
2 Sept 2026, 10:24
29,615
-8
1 Sept 2026, 07:25
29,623
-15
31 Aug 2026, 09:18
29,638
-18
30 Aug 2026, 11:17
29,656
-11
29 Aug 2026, 09:37
29,667
-8
28 Aug 2026, 10:04
29,675
-14
27 Aug 2026, 12:24
29,689
+3
26 Aug 2026, 14:12
29,686
-14
25 Aug 2026, 15:04
29,700
-9
24 Aug 2026, 17:47
29,709
first reading
Engagement
235 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.98%
avg views ÷ 29,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,390
184 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.368%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
184
of 235 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 178 of 184 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held
235 (30 July 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total
439,529
Reactions total
1,566
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Oct 2026, 10:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 04s
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,388 reactions across 227 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
808
33.8%
💩
170
7.12%
🤡
137
5.74%
👏
136
5.70%
😁
123
5.15%
🤬
108
4.52%
🤣
102
4.27%
💊
80
3.35%
🖕
74
3.10%
🤯
62
2.60%
🍌
41
1.72%
🎃
40
1.68%
😴
39
1.63%
🔥
37
1.55%
🤔
37
1.55%
😢
33
1.38%
🍾
30
1.26%
😱
30
1.26%
🌚
29
1.21%
🥰
28
1.17%
34 further kinds
244
10.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 235 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 235 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SINGAPORE:-
There might be "some restrictions" on outdoor activity such as entertainment during this weekend's Singapore Grand Prix, but not on the race, if the haze currently blanketing the city-state worsens, the motor sports governing body said on Thursday (Oct 8).
Singapore has been shrouded in smoke for weeks, with the air quality currently in the "unhealthy" range across the country, just a day ahead of the ra…
SINGAPORE:-
A 21-year-old man who performed a motorcycle stunt along the East Coast Parkway (ECP) was sentenced to 15 months' probation on Wednesday (Oct 7).
Mohamed Asfa Mohamed Azli, a Singaporean, had stretched out his body and lay flat in a prone position on the bike, in what court documents called a "Superman stunt" that was dangerous to other road users.
His actions came to light when a traffic police officer…
SINGAPORE:-
A 32-year-old man was charged on Wednesday (Oct 7) with murdering a 73-year-old man at a void deck in Telok Blangah two days earlier.
Gabriel Foong Shi Cheng, a Singaporean, was handed one count of murder for causing the death of Mr Tham Nam Poh at about 6pm on Monday.
He allegedly did so at the void deck of Block 57, Telok Blangah Heights.
Details of how he allegedly committed the murder were not given…
SINGAPORE:-
A 35-year-old teacher was sentenced to nine years' jail on Monday (Oct 5) for performing several sexual acts on her then-15-year-old student.
The teacher had pleaded guilty to one charge of sexual penetration of a minor and two charges of sexually exploiting a young person under the age of 16.
Another five charges of sexually exploiting a young person, one charge of sexual grooming and another for sexua…
In meting out the sentence, Judge Chan said that the woman had made "serious errors of judgement" and that her actions crossed professional boundaries.
He also acknowledged the harm caused to the victim, but added that he hoped the woman would turn over a new leaf.
"I have read the many testimonials tendered to you, and it's clear you have many redeeming qualities. Upon your release, apply these qualities for the b…
SINGAPORE:-
A 32-year-old man will be charged on Oct 7 with killing a 73-year-old man following an incident in Telok Blangah Heights on Oct 5.
The police said in a statement that they received calls for assistance near Block 61 Telok Blangah Heights at about 6pm.
When they arrived, a 73-year-old man was found lying motionless at the scene, while a 53-year-old man was found injured at the ground floor of the block.
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 235 posts we hold for @singaporenews65. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@singaporenews65 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sahatsiregar_propperty named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SINGAPORE NEWS” (@singaporenews65), 29,916 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/singaporenews65.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.