5 measurements spanning 36 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 23:19
104
+6
28 Aug 2026, 05:47
98
+6
14 Aug 2026, 02:17
92
-2
9 Aug 2026, 12:47
94
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:50
94
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
26
46.4%
❤
14
25.0%
🐳
9
16.1%
👍
6
10.7%
👌
1
1.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
SINUX Kernel v0.5 has been released.
Changes:
Added fb.c/.h
Added bga.c/.h
Added pci.c/.h
Removed vga.c/.h
+639 lines added
-97 lines removed
What's New ✨ :
Beyond VGA limitations.
Custom resolutions.
24/32-bit color support.
Custom font support.
Better graphics foundation.
GitHub 💻
@Sinux_Channel
@Sinook_Free_Content
If you like the project, drop a ⭐ on Github!, tnx ❤️
🔥تولد سینوکس🔥
دقیقا یک سال پیش در چنین روزی، Sinux فقط یک ایده بود، ایده ای که از دل کنجکاوی متولد شد.
اولین نسخه با ورژن 0.01 منتشر شد؛ یک سیستم عامل سادهی ۳۲ بیتی که تنها سه دستور داشت:
Clear
Shutdown
Reboot
شاید آن روز کسی فکر نمیکرد این پروژه روزی به چیزی بزرگتر تبدیل شود، اما هر خط کد، هر مشکل و هر شبِ برنامهنویسی، سینوکس را یک قدم به جلو برد.
اما امروز، پس از یک سال تلاش، یادگیری و توسعه، سینوکس به پروژه …
SINUX Kernel v0.4.1 has been released.
Changes:
Add real fork()
Address space copy
Add init in ring3 (userspace)
A small step for Sun, a giant leap toward userland.
Github 💻
@Sinux_Channel
@Sinook_Free_Content
یک چیز رو بگم درمورد سینوکس که ابهامات بعضی ها بطرف بشه :
سینوکس یک توزیع لینوکسی نیست.
حتی کرنل لینوکس رو بازنویسی نکرده.
سینوکس یونیکس هم نیست اما یونیکس/لینوکس لایک هست.
سینوکس کاملا از صفر توسعه داده شده و به اینجا رسیده.
@Sinux_Channel
ممنون از همکاری و زحمات Cluvex عزیز برای توسعه و همکاری در پروژه آزاد و متن باز کرنل Sinux و اضافه کردن قابلیتهای جدید:
• بهبود مدیریت حافظه (Memory Management)
• عملیاتی شدن kfree()
• افزایش ظرفیت PMM
• ارتقای امنیت با استفاده از SHA-256 Hashing
• بازنویسی کامل auth.c
• بهبود سیستم مدیریت خطاها
• ارتقای درایور ATA
• بهینهسازی Memory Handling
• رفع Memory Leakهای شناساییشده
از همراهی و مشارکت ارزشمند CluvexStudio …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sinux_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sinux_channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@sinook_free_content named in 3 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sinux” (@sinux_channel), 104 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sinux_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.