Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Синявский'

Channel

Синявский'

@sinyavskiytim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,541subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002034975098
TypeChannel
Username@sinyavskiytim
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sinyavskiytim

Growth

1,4631,5411,5026 August 2026 — 1,497 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,495 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,493 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,484 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,477 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,463 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,469 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,479 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,497 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,526 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,541 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 31 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,451–1,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:571,541+15
2 Sept 2026, 02:561,526+29
29 Aug 2026, 22:091,497+18
27 Aug 2026, 05:141,479+10
23 Aug 2026, 21:561,469+6
20 Aug 2026, 01:131,463-14
16 Aug 2026, 17:141,477-7
12 Aug 2026, 18:071,484-9
9 Aug 2026, 15:211,493-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:001,495-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:451,497no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:371,497first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9626.1%
😁7720.9%
🔥7219.6%
custom 54606260501091541904612.5%
👏236.25%
👍215.71%
👎143.80%
❤‍🔥61.63%
🤡51.36%
🗿30.815%
🤯30.815%
💅20.543%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC290 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Раньше «Арсенал» собирал себе лучший центр поля в мире — собрал. Теперь «Арсенал» делает так, чтобы таких элитных центров не было у конкурентов, яростно скупая всех, кого можно и нельзя

6🔥5👏2

3 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC388 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чем пахнет, как думаете? Презент от Боба

😁123👏3🤡2

25 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC694 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Помогаю скрасить почти час ожидания евросезона. Велком к просмотру!

11🔥4👍2👎1

19 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC890 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто?

  1. Испания 2008-201268%
  2. Испания 2024-202637%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 22:13 UTC724 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рад, что закончилось именно так. Совершенно по делу, без сомнений

17🔥3👎1💅1

19 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC764 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Долго думал по поводу адекватной ставки на финал. Так и не придумал. Самый непредсказуемый матч последних 4 лет. В итоге взял вот такое. Ямаля будет персонально держать либо Тальяфико, либо Медина. Оба, мягко скажем, не Нуну Мендеши. Да и будет красиво, если Ямаль сегодня нахлобучит Аргентину, и заберет эстафетную палочку величия вместе с кубком мира. Уж слишком хороша эта Испания. Мы все еще не догадываемся, где её

7🔥6👎1💅1

19 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC565 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Де ла Фуэнте перед полуфиналом: «Юлий Цезарь говорил, что не будет великих достижений без страданий. Испания готова страдать» Перед финалом: «Мы со Скалони на многое смотрим одинаково. Если придется терпеть, будем терпеть. Как говорил Марк Аврелий, важен улей, а не пчела» После победы ждём цитату Стэтхэма?

😁18🔥31

18 Jul 2026, 22:57 UTC551 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За Англию на этом ЧМ не сыграли только двое: третий вратарь Траффорд и Кобби Майну

😁135custom 54606260501091541905👎4

18 Jul 2026, 22:30 UTC546 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А, ну почти так и играли

😁9🗿3👎1🤡1

18 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC573 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы так и не узнали, кто круче, Сака или Месси. Зато теперь знаем, что Сака круче Мбаппе

😁18❤‍🔥4👍4👎2

18 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC582 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 546062605010915419013😁74🔥2👎1

18 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC548 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Осталось решить, что делать с празднованием

5👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sinyavskiytim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTCAnonymous Poll157 voters

Кто?

  1. Испания 2008-201268%
  2. Испания 2024-202637%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синявский'” (@sinyavskiytim), 1,541 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sinyavskiytim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.