Channel
@sitadel_quote
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
189subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413734070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sitadel_quote |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sitadel_quote |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 189 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 187 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 190 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 192 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 186 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 186 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 32.0% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bolasini yoʻqotgan ona yuragi yorilib oʻlishi mumkin. Nomusi, izzat-nafsi toptalgan qizning boshidan kerosin quyib, oʻziga oʻt qoʻyganini koʻp eshitganmiz. Tahqirlangan, tuhmatga uchragan odam alamdan oʻzini osib oʻldiradi... Endi ayting, tan yarasi yomonmi yo dil dardimi? Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
Fikrim "vaqt oʻtyapti!” deymiz sal hazinlik bilan. Bu gapni inson oʻzini ovutish uchun oʻylab topgan. Aslida biz oʻzimiz oʻtyapmiz... Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
Yozuvchi yolgʻonni toʻqiydi-yu, haqiqatni yozadi. Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
Odamni oʻzini yoqtirasizmi yo soyasini baʼzi odamlarning soyasi yaxshiroq oʻzidan Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
“Faoliyat ko‘rsatishni amalga oshirdilar”, “sharofati natijasida”, “raqobat kurashi”, “ustidan kuldi”... Bunday “nodir” kashfiyotlarni sanayversangiz, son mingta. Yoshlarning, ayniqsa, muxbirlarning tildagi palapartishliklaridan har gal ranjiyman. Axir tilimiz – shakllangan buyuk tarixiy til. Hech bo‘lmasa, uning oq sochli bobo yoshini hurmat qilish kerak. U yuz yil emas, besh yuz yoki ming yil emas, o‘n besh, hatto …
❤1🔥1
“Ko‘cha odamlar bilan gavjum”, deydilar. Vaholanki, “odamlar bilan gavjum”, “qo‘ylar bilan gavjum” deb bo‘lmaydi. Chunki “gavjum”ning o‘zi “odam ko‘p” degani. Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
“Ustuvor” – mustahkam, poydor, davomli degan so‘z. Biz uni ustunlik, ya’ni “prioritet” ma’nosida ishlatamiz: “ustuvor yo‘nalishlar”, “qonun ustuvorligi”... “Ustun yo‘nalishlar”, “qonun ustunligi” deb, oddiygina o‘zbekcha va to‘g‘ri gapirishga nima yetsin! Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
“Nur alan-nur” degan yaxshi ibora bor. Uni ko‘pincha “Nur ustiga a’lo nur” deb nodonlarcha buzib ishlatadilar. Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
Xalqni ajratib tashlash uchun alifboni o'zgartirishdan ham qulay siyosat bormidi? Asqad Muxtor 👉 Qisqa satrlar
"Mashhur eski bir iborani bilasanmi: “Qashshoqlik eshikdan kirsa, sevgi oynadan uchib ketadi”. Ko‘p odamlar bunga doim noto‘g‘ri ma’no beradi. Bu erkakning puli tugaganda ayol undan ajralishini anglatmaydi. Bundan maqsad shundaki: erkakning puli tugaganda... u qalbini yo‘qotadi, qadrsiz bo‘ladi. U shunchalik ojizlashadiki, hatto kulishga ham kuchi yetmaydi, g‘alati kamsitilish tuyg‘usi qamrab oladi, ojiz qoladi va ay…
❤2👏1🔥1
Baxtsiz odamdan yomonroq ahvoldagi odam bor - bu bir paytlar baxtli bo'lganini xotirlaydigan odam. 👉 Qisqa satrlar
Shayx Muhammad Mutavalli Sha’roviy “Mana shuni rizq deymiz” Musulmon kishi borki, umriga rizqiga baraka so’rashdan to’xtamidi. Rizq o’zi nima? Taqdirga yozilib bo’linganmi yoki duo, harakat orqali o’zgartirsa bo’ladimi? Hammasi kitobda qisqa bo’lsada tushuntirib o’tilgan. Kitobning asosiy maqsadi bandaga Allohni eslatib turish, ehson qilish va payti kelganda qanoat qilib yashashga urg’u berilgan. Nega hammani rizqi…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sitadel_quote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sitadel_quote named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qisqa satrlar” (@sitadel_quote), 189 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitadel_quote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.