Channel
@sitevrost
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
463subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001303058417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sitevrost |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sitevrost |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 463 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 465 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 455 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 453 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 455 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 455 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 47.4% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 42.1% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 10.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️ Что сильнее всего влияет на попадание бренда в ответы ИИ? Вышло одно из самых крупных исследований по видимости в LLM: 403 000 промптов, 10 моделей ИИ и 100 отраслей. Для ниши юридических услуг для B2B самые сильные факторы оказались такими: 🔹 присутствие на первой странице Google — самый сильный сигнал; 🔹 главная страница четко объясняет, чем занимается компания; 🔹 качественные тематические ссылки и высокий авт…
🔥2
☝️ Несколько важных событий в поиске привлекли наше внимание за последний месяц. В этом месяце мы более подробно рассмотрим некоторые из последних анонсов Google и то, что изменилось. Давайте перейдем к новостям. 1. Google Search Console теперь может отслеживать социальный и видео контент Google вышел из строя Свойства платформы по всему миру в Search Console, позволяя маркетологам отслеживать, как контент, опубли…
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😁1
⚡️Новая игра - Змейка: https://chat.z.ai/space/r1t746h6tu41-art - приглашаю залипнуть немного 😊. Все очень просто!
👍1
⚡️Agent Arena выкатил свой ранкинг агентов нейросетей. Динамическое ранжирование моделей в зависимости от того, насколько хорошо они управляют инструментами для решения реальных агентурных задач, на основе таких показателей, как надежность инструментов, выполнение задач и управляемость. Вот их метода: https://arena.ai/blog/agent-arena-methodology/ в приложении сравниловка, она в полной версии тут: https://arena.ai/…
🔥1
В догонку про нейросеть https://chat.z.ai/ я сделал простым промтом вот такую мини-игру Super Mario Run: https://chat.z.ai/space/w11cp58wm0x1-art и так же по простому промту сайт HR-агентства Хорошая работа с админкой: https://u10y95t2s9p1-d.space-z.ai/ все это бесплатно!
🔥1
Нейросеть 🚀 chat.z.ai: Полный разбор нейросети, которая заменяет ChatGPT и Claude в SEO-работе (без VPN и переплат) Рынок ИИ-инструментов для SEO перенасыщен, но большинство топовых решений либо требуют сложных настроек сети, либо стоят неоправданно дорого. На сцену уверенно выходит chat.z.ai — платформа от китайской лаборатории Zhipu AI, построенная на передовых моделях семейства GLM (включая флагманские GLM-4.5, G…
👍1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Так? не?
👍2
📊 ДАЙДЖЕСТ SEO-НОВОСТЕЙ: Что происходит с поиском в 2026? 🔥 НОВОСТЬ 1: ИИ УБИВАЕТ ОРГАНИКУ — ТРАФИК ПАДАЕТ НА 50% 📰 Что произошло? С начала 2025 года сайты массово теряют от 30 до 50% органического трафика. Пользователи всё реже кликают на результаты поиска — нейросети дают ответы прямо в интерфейсе. Но вот парадокс: видимость в ИИ-поиске стала новой золотой жилой, и у неё свои правила игры. Исследование 2,2 млн з…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sitevrost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SEOдня 🌞 | все про SEO и GEO” (@sitevrost), 463 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sitevrost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.