28 measurements spanning 33 days, net -659. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,628–12,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 02:39
11,727
-87
5 Sept 2026, 15:38
11,814
-30
3 Sept 2026, 13:40
11,844
-25
2 Sept 2026, 04:36
11,869
-16
1 Sept 2026, 04:46
11,885
-26
31 Aug 2026, 05:46
11,911
-19
30 Aug 2026, 02:55
11,930
-29
29 Aug 2026, 02:16
11,959
-12
28 Aug 2026, 01:24
11,971
-13
27 Aug 2026, 02:02
11,984
-12
26 Aug 2026, 04:12
11,996
-21
25 Aug 2026, 02:27
12,017
-41
23 Aug 2026, 16:19
12,058
-30
22 Aug 2026, 03:54
12,088
-33
20 Aug 2026, 23:36
12,121
-21
19 Aug 2026, 21:22
12,142
-18
18 Aug 2026, 21:45
12,160
-21
17 Aug 2026, 21:04
12,181
-12
16 Aug 2026, 22:13
12,193
-26
15 Aug 2026, 12:59
12,219
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.26%
avg views ÷ 11,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
382
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
22 (18 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
764
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
463 reactions across 22 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
61
13.2%
😡
49
10.6%
👎
41
8.86%
🤬
37
7.99%
🥴
36
7.78%
🤔
29
6.26%
👏
23
4.97%
😁
21
4.54%
😱
20
4.32%
😨
19
4.10%
❤
15
3.24%
👀
12
2.59%
😐
12
2.59%
🤨
10
2.16%
😢
9
1.94%
🤯
9
1.94%
😭
8
1.73%
👌
7
1.51%
🔥
7
1.51%
😈
6
1.30%
13 further kinds
32
6.91%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
İstanbul'da müşterilerin gizlice kaydedilip görüntülerinin satıldığı bir güzellik merkezine operasyon düzenlendi. Yapılan incelemelerde yaklaşık 14.000 görüntü tespit edildi, iş yeri sahibi dahil 2 şüpheli gözaltına alındı.
Sizce Bu haber hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
İstanbul'da bakkala giren yaşlı bir adam, hareketli müzik çaldığını duyunca aniden dans etmeye başladı.
Sizce Bu anı izlemek sizi güldürdü mü?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Bakırköy'de bir kadın, iddiaya göre kedilere mama verdiği gerekçesiyle vatandaşların sokaktan geçmesine izin vermedi.
Sizce Bu tür olayların ardında neler yatıyor?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Evlenecek bir kadın, düğün salonu fiyatlarına isyan etti: "Az önce bir salondan çıktık. 400 kişilikti, bulunduğu semt de çok iyi değildi. Yemeksiz fiyatı 1 milyon 200 bin TL'ydi. Bu fiyatlar şaka olmalı, başka açıklaması yok."
Sizce Düğün salonu fiyatları makul mü?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Sakarya’da evini çöp eve çeviren hemşire, çöpler arasında tıbbi atıkların da bulunması üzerine açığa alındı.
Sizce Bu durumun sebebi nedir?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
TikTok üzerinden paylaşım yapan 2003 doğumlu bir şahıs, 'müstehcenlik' ve 'halkın bir kesiminin benimsediği dini değerleri alenen aşağılama' suçlamalarıyla gözaltına alındı.
Sizce Sosyal medya paylaşımları için daha sıkı denetim gerekli mi?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Bir genç kız, babasının hediye ettiği BMW marka arabaya tepki gösterdi: “Bu ne baba? Bu çok eski. Ben böyle bir şey istemiyordum.”
Sizce Babanın hediye ettiği arabanın eski olması kızın tepkisini haklı kılar mı?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Marmaris’te çocukları için 3 top dondurmaya 400 TL ödeyen anne ile işletme sahibi arasında tartışma çıktı: - Bu kadar pahalı olamaz, sizi belediye dahil her yere şikayet edeceğim. + Her yere şikayet et. Belediye başkanına da git.
Sizce Dondurma fiyatları makul mü?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
Japonya'da Karslı ve Ordulu iki aile arasında kavga çıktı.
Sizce Böyle kavgaların sebebi nedir?
“Yorum Sizde Söz Sizde”
🥴7😁7🤣5❤1👍1🤔1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @sizdeyorum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sizde Yorum” (@sizdeyorum), 11,727 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sizdeyorum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.