Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sjinc телеграмит 18+

Channel

sjinc телеграмит 18+

@sjincer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002173834022
TypeChannel
Username@sjincer
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sjincer

Growth

425428426.56 August 2026 — 428 subscribers6 August 2026 — 428 subscribers29 August 2026 — 426 subscribers7 September 2026 — 425 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 32 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 425–428 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 03:40425-1
29 Aug 2026, 05:47426-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:19428no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:38428first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

310 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19663.2%
custom 54519978774233353503812.3%
custom 5258334975958204738299.35%
custom 5269417258597228015165.16%
🙏165.16%
❤‍🔥92.90%
🍓41.29%
🔥20.645%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC61 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pidr6669Photo

Весь год гнил

custom 545199787742333535010custom 525833497595820473862custom 52694172585972280152

4 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC131 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

закину вам чтобы совсем грустно не было свою вторую любимую атаку за весь артфайт (вовремя да) Суммарно об артфайте: во второй его половине меня покинули силы, а еще я сделала коррекцию зрения и до сих пор рисовать тяжело вот такие пироги.

32❤‍🔥7custom 52583349759582047386custom 52694172585972280154custom 54519978774233353503

2 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC160 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @KKBACCCPhoto

☺️

18custom 52694172585972280157custom 52583349759582047386custom 54519978774233353503

2 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC159 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

а что-то кроме репостов будет? возможно

12custom 54519978774233353503

31 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC160 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

смотрите какая моська виноватая :D

8

31 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC186 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @janonnaartPhoto

Заказовое для @sj_inc ! Еще никогда не доводилось работать с таким освещением, но ого как рада экспериментам #dnd

24custom 52583349759582047386custom 52694172585972280153custom 54519978774233353503

26 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC271 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dumply18plusPhoto

Лексус ахуенный едет Атака на @sjincer 🍤

30🍓2🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC297 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я не понимаю, вас в осовых постах что ли стена текста пугает? 🦈 Че такая разница по реактам с другими постами Причем те же посты с артфайт штуками норм собрали, хотя казалось бы тоже не фандомные штуки ___ #shitpost

24🙏7custom 52583349759582047385

23 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC285 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Немножко совсем накопившегося. Мы с девчонками пошли играть в новый кампейн!!! В этот раз пробуем официальный модуль: "Иней Морозной Девы" 🐡 Для незнающих и в двух словах: бегаем выживачем полупеcочнечным по Долине Ледяного Ветра (она же Айсвинд Дейл), морозим жопы, получаем пизды, весело пиздец. НО САМОЕ ВЕСЕЛОЕ: Я СМОГЛА ВЗЯТЬ И СНОВА ПОИГРАТЬ СВОЕГО ЛЮБИМЕЙШЕГО НРИ ПЕРСОНАЖА!!! Я уже показывала Рузу здесь неско

46custom 545199787742333535016🙏9❤‍🔥2🍓2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @sjincer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sjinc телеграмит 18+” (@sjincer), 425 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sjincer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.