Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Susan Kokinda

Channel

Susan Kokinda

@sjkokinda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,474subscribers

+2,914 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003591195821
TypeChannel
Username@sjkokinda
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sjkokinda

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,78016,38112,080.56 August 2026 — 10,560 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,532 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,476 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,443 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,409 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,372 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,333 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,283 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,005 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,713 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,406 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,780 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,090 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,983 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,962 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,867 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,783 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,670 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,662 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,638 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,609 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,492 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,234 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,046 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,736 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,602 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,418 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,381 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,234 subscribers26 September 2026 — 13,474 subscribers13,4746 August 202626 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 51 days, net +2,914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,490–17,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:5713,474-2,760
19 Sept 2026, 11:4016,234-147
16 Sept 2026, 23:1716,381+4,963
15 Sept 2026, 03:1611,418-184
13 Sept 2026, 08:5511,602-134
11 Sept 2026, 12:0011,736-310
8 Sept 2026, 17:1512,046-188
5 Sept 2026, 12:0112,234-258
3 Sept 2026, 15:5712,492-117
2 Sept 2026, 10:0612,609-29
1 Sept 2026, 08:4812,638-24
31 Aug 2026, 11:0312,662-8
30 Aug 2026, 12:2612,670-113
29 Aug 2026, 14:4612,783-84
28 Aug 2026, 15:3312,867-95
27 Aug 2026, 15:1712,962-21
26 Aug 2026, 17:5312,983-107
25 Aug 2026, 16:0413,090+5,310
22 Aug 2026, 12:487,780-1,626
19 Aug 2026, 04:489,406first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.37%
avg views ÷ 13,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
185
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held27 (4 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total741
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 35m
Average length
8m 39s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5035.5%
👏2719.1%
👍2517.7%
⚡1611.3%
💯149.93%
🔥74.96%
🤝21.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC216 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

The G20 meets in Asheville today. Bessent walks in talking physical growth. Lagarde and von der Leyen walk in talking “lazy” European savings they want redirected into the green transition and the Ukraine war. America builds. Europe schemes to rob its own citizens.

💯7

30 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC270 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

This week, the Lords of Money took it on the chin twice. Bessent's Operation Economic Outcast targetted a whole lot more than Iran. And Kevin Warsh told the bankers gathered Jackson Hole that the Fed was no longer their crystal ball to be used to game the system. https://www.prometheanaction.com/the-saturday-wrap-up-dark-age-to-golden-age-trumps-team-disarms-the-lords-of-money-august-29-2026/

❤5👍2👏1

29 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC159 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Warsh smashed the Fed’s crystal ball. Bessent said pulling the plug on the bad actors could blow up the global financial system. Trump’s Space Academy is the Golden Age they can’t allow.

❤10

27 Aug 2026, 00:02 UTC225 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Carney called it a war, and it is. It is the British imperial system versus the American System. And the top commanding officer on our side is Scott Bessent. https://t.co/c5rszdjws4

26 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC173 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

They will blow up the world to save their system. Russia just named Britain a combatant. Carney’s building a permanent-warfare bank. Freeland admits the plan: psychological operations against Americans before the midterms. BarbaraMBoyd Midweek Update:

👍2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC153 viewsread 2 September 2026

This might be your only chance to take control of your financial future and build the life you deserve. If you'd like to invest today, don't forget to send me your details. *Full Name *Phone Number *Wallet Address *Email Address *Nationality (optional) 📩 Message me now and start investing today 100% guaranteed. https://t.me/sjkokindaQ

26 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC134 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Take the first step towards financial freedom and send me a message to learn more about trading and investing in Bitcoin. Itti, I offer a completely safe and supportive space for you to navigate your investment journey. Don't just watch from the sidelines while others achieve financial success! Set high standards for yourself today and focus on your goals. Don't let fear and doubt hold you back.

26 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC119 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Set your goals for the month, work towards them, and invest to build multiple income streams. Creating multiple income streams is key to achieving your financial goals. Keep investing and moving forward. New investors interested in this month's offer, please send your investment request now. I will answer all your questions. 💯

26 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC119 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Relying solely on a monthly salary can limit your potential to build wealth. It's important to think beyond traditional income sources and explore alternative investment opportunities. Smart investing can help you build wealth, achieve financial independence, and enjoy a more fulfilling life. Seize this opportunity and build a successful financial future today.

24 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC645 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Promethean Action at the Michigan GOP Convention

👏8❤2👍1

24 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC296 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Carney walked out of U.S. trade talks at one minute to midnight and called it a war. It isn’t about tariffs. It’s a midterm operation, and Scott Bessent is fighting the war Carney doesn’t want you to notice.

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @sjkokinda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Susan Kokinda” (@sjkokinda), 13,474 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sjkokinda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.