Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for . . . ˚𝙎𝙠𝙖𝙞𝙭 𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠 [🌸]

Channel

. . . ˚𝙎𝙠𝙖𝙞𝙭 𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠 [🌸]

@skaix_gbook

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004460352915
TypeChannel
Username@skaix_gbook
Created25 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/skaix_gbook

Growth

1113129 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12 subscribers9 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:1512-1
31 Aug 2026, 07:1413+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:1712+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:1611no change
9 Aug 2026, 22:3011first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

Оценка 1000000/10 флуд крутой очень нету никаких минусов все прекрасно но иногда кто-то из участников или админов может нарушать правила а так все ок оставить отзыв ⬅ @skaix_gb_bot

8 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

Оценка: 7/10 Я нахожусь во флуде несколько и хочу поделиться своими впечатлениями. Мне понравилось — работа владельца, оформление в инфо, лайфе и флуде Не понравилось — флуд не особо активен, поэтому нет хорошей атмосферы. я бы посоветовала найти какого-нибудь активиста, который мог бы заводить весь чат оставить отзыв ⬅ @skaix_gb_bot

8 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

флуд 10/10 все круто! но хотелось бы расписанию по играм типо админы могли проходит игры с участниками по времени примерно: в 15:00 проходится мафия!проводит осоро или другой админ оставить отзыв ⬅ @skaix_gb_bot

👍1

12 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026

всем пр нахожусь во флуде 6 месяцев и 8 дней и обожаю его оценка 10 из 10 оч крутые и добрые участники и админы влд ваще пусечка он мой батя и у нас там целая династия флуд оч поменялся с того времени но. лучшую сторону для меня это был второй и самый лучший флуд по янсим если вы первый раз в этой сфере советую наш флуд мне все понравилось минусов нету оставить отзыв ⤵️ @skaix_gb_bot

12 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC62 viewsread 12 August 2026

Оценка 9/10 Нахожусь во флуде 6 месяцев 11 дней Оформление — супер бомба нахуй Участники — супер бомба нахуй Я — супер бомба нахуй Но мы лешилась царя Мегами, в этот день не спал весь мир Так что не дотянулось до 10/10 из-за ухода царя Прошу не кидать подобные отзывы. Вы оцениваете флуд, а не наличие ваших друзей там🌟

25 Jun 2026, 18:12 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Оценка: 9/10 Я нахожусь во флуде месяц и хочу поделиться своими впечатлениями. Мне понравилось — Красивое оформление, понимающий влд, смешные участники Не понравилось — участники могут быть агрессивными. Так же напрягают все эти ссоры с борупеном но они вроде уже прошли оставить отзыв ⤵️⭐️⭐️ @skaix_gb_bot

👍3

25 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Оценка:8/10 Я нахожусь во флуде почти 2 месяца и хочу поделиться своими впечатлениями. Мне понравилось - красивое оформление, добрые админы, встреча подруги. Мне не понравилось - агрессивные участники, безопасность тут находиться. Причина почему 8/10 объяснена выше оставить отзыв ⤵️⭐️ @skaix_gb_bot

👍4

25 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

принимаем отзывы только по шаблону или в развёрнутом виде!

👍1

25 Jun 2026, 08:39 UTC66 viewsread 12 August 2026

Наше инфо — @FloodKenYansim Лайф Канал — @skaixlifechannel тт аки — skaix.flood skaixfood Бот для отзывов — @skaix_gb_bot Бот флуда —

25 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐️😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 флуда «𝙎𝙠𝙖𝙞𝙭» 🎀Приветствую. Это «guest book», или на русском «книга отзывов». В этом канале будут публиковаться отзывы участников нашего флуда, которые, возможно, помогут вам ориентироваться. Мы постим как плохие, так и хорошие отзывы. 🌟🌟𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️🎞️ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Вы должны быть во флуде минимум три недели, чтобы полностью ознакомиться с ним и дать точную, честную оценку. ❕❕❕ 2️⃣ Ш

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @skaix_gbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“. . . ˚𝙎𝙠𝙖𝙞𝙭 𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙠 [🌸]” (@skaix_gbook), 12 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skaix_gbook.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.