Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for STłCKERS BY KØRXDY

Channel

STłCKERS BY KØRXDY

@skorxdy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

380subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003720492892
TypeChannel
Username@skorxdy
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 14 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/skorxdy

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3604924267 August 2026 — 363 subscribers7 August 2026 — 360 subscribers13 August 2026 — 492 subscribers21 August 2026 — 457 subscribers29 August 2026 — 417 subscribers7 September 2026 — 394 subscribers15 September 2026 — 380 subscribers3807 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 340–512 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:01380-14
7 Sept 2026, 06:59394-23
29 Aug 2026, 02:16417-40
21 Aug 2026, 06:36457-35
13 Aug 2026, 15:38492+132
7 Aug 2026, 14:34360-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:46363first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

363 reactions across 16 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53843180576508805916016.5%
custom 53843206389262231356016.5%
custom 5339086713379625821236.34%
custom 5384586999913019518195.23%
custom 5467796841607218320195.23%
custom 5247197185161835652174.68%
custom 5316827018870929112164.41%
custom 5199959807695541860154.13%
custom 5384508105658757372143.86%
custom 5386590353048496738133.58%
custom 519993518464803346882.20%
custom 523128649599369665182.20%
custom 529864084314444688582.20%
custom 538455789291965129782.20%
custom 541120982284869397782.20%
custom 543143647311300024282.20%
custom 524683631341969417771.93%
custom 546752236742720223371.93%
custom 522446053453491610261.65%
custom 538457111282898897661.65%
8 further kinds339.09%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
105
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
80
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skorxdy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026

ПРОПИАРЬ СВОЙ КАНАЛ ИЛИ ГРУППУ В ЭТОМ ПИАР ЧАТЕ !!! https://t.me/piarchatossms ☑️

Signed O̸S͛A̸M̸A̸NO̸V̸A︎ | t.me/factskiss

6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026

ХОТИТЕ ПРОДАТЬ КАНАЛ?? КУПЛЮ ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ КАНАЛЫ ОТ 500+ ПИШИТЕ @os7mznovv МОЯ ГРУППА ОТЗЫВОВ @topotzvoosm НЕ ПОЖАЛЕЕТЕ О ПРОДАЖЕ 🫥

Signed O̸S͛A̸M̸A̸NO̸V̸A︎ | t.me/factskiss

5 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC78 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👻 chb stīckers wīth kaī angeł #кайэнжел #чб

custom 53843180576508805916custom 53843206389262231354

Signed кир дил [корди]

3 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC120 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📹 stīckers wīth maia mitchell #майямитчел

custom 53843180576508805918custom 53843206389262231354

Signed кир дил [корди]

3 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC163 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕺 stīckers & cuts wīth inst_rinna [103р.] #инстрина #нарезки

custom 53843180576508805915custom 53843206389262231354

Signed кир дил [корди]

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC289 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

[ради интереса] кого выберете?

  1. лёша кореш41%
  2. саша парадеевич59%
  3. молодой платон24%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed кир дил [корди]

2 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC352 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😊 stīckers wīth kae4ka & alexeeva #каечка #настяалексеева #дбл

custom 538432063892622313511custom 53843180576508805915

Signed кир дил [корди]

1 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC283 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍒 stīckers wīth vīsshėnka #вишенка

custom 538432063892622313513custom 53843180576508805916

Signed кир дил [корди]

31 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC854 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎮 stīckers wīth øleg cøffi #олегкоффи

custom 538431805765088059115custom 53843206389262231357

Signed кир дил [корди]

31 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC790 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 stīckers wīth nełya rāy #нэлярэй

custom 538431805765088059112custom 53843206389262231358

Signed кир дил [корди]

31 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC507 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ посты выкладываются каждый день,может и по несколько раз,а так же отсутствуют оп,вп,приходы и какой-либо другой пиар,можете смело включать уведы 🌟 кидайте запрос в бот @korxdy_bot,перед этим почитайте правила в инфе канала не забывайте про комменты и реакции

custom 53843206389262231359custom 53843180576508805913

Signed кир дил [корди]

31 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎀 stīckers wīth ałana #алана

custom 531682701887092911216custom 52922218298369806845

Signed кир дил [корди]

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @skorxdy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

[ради интереса] кого выберете?

  1. лёша кореш41%
  2. саша парадеевич59%
  3. молодой платон24%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“STłCKERS BY KØRXDY” (@skorxdy), 380 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skorxdy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.