Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Slackers

Channel

Slackers

@slackerskf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

317subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004393934629
TypeChannel
Username@slackerskf
Created11 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slackerskf

Growth

3083223157 August 2026 — 322 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers14 August 2026 — 308 subscribers22 August 2026 — 317 subscribers3177 August 202622 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 306–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 01:18317+9
14 Aug 2026, 10:27308-12
8 Aug 2026, 07:32320no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:58320-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:51322first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54294520994380153451318.1%
custom 53122235483690467281115.3%
custom 60105829672508525491013.9%
custom 527407954008634905879.72%
custom 547192141466570201479.72%
custom 535260552237576984068.33%
custom 539780506670914099768.33%
custom 542957723760515115068.33%
custom 544087034730385478968.33%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 9 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slackerskf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC614 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔫Мы представляем вам возможность высказывать свои мысли анонимно. Делитесь своими впечатлениями, обсуждайте, интересуйтесь, признавайтесь в любви. Ждем всех в нашей Подслушке.

Signed Zādиpá

17 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC548 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Zādиpá

17 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC528 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 54294520994380153458custom 53122235483690467285custom 60105829672508525495custom 54719214146657020142custom 52740795400863490581custom 53526055223757698401

Signed Zādиpá

14 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC882 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

⭐ Мью мне. папки: рп, актив(+рп) макс пдп: 4:4 правила писать: @Uniindesbot

custom 52740795400863490584custom 53978050667091409973custom 54408703473038547893custom 54295772376051511502custom 54719214146657020142custom 60105829672508525492custom 53122235483690467281custom 53526055223757698401

11 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC670 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👋 Информация о заключении союзов необходимо направлять через анон любого из администраторов, после обязательного ознакомления с правилами. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Ms 📤 rules Sl 📤 rules Tero 📤 rules

custom 54294520994380153453custom 53122235483690467282custom 53978050667091409972custom 54295772376051511502custom 60105829672508525492custom 52740795400863490581custom 53526055223757698401custom 54408703473038547891

11 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC614 views16 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Welcome to the family of Slackers. Rules🖱️Boost🖱️Patent 👤 Tik Tok account 🔥Admins Chat 🔥Anon🔥Sign 🔥Eavesdropping

custom 53122235483690467283custom 53526055223757698403custom 54295772376051511502custom 54408703473038547892custom 54719214146657020142custom 52740795400863490581custom 53978050667091409971custom 54294520994380153451

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @slackerskf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,021,730 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Slackers” (@slackerskf), 317 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slackerskf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.