Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СЛАВЯНСКИЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК

Channel

СЛАВЯНСКИЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК

@slavchelovek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

46,445subscribers

-581 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109935449
TypeChannel
Username@slavchelovek
DescriptionПо всем вопросам @Rusichtyt Наш ВК https://vk.com/club215227974 Рекомендуем каналы↘️ https://t.me/Dyxnpegkov https://t.me/Pycnampuom https://t.me/Muzzpyc Менеджеры @hugostep @lichka_patriota @Aleksandr9023 @rabotaem_meneger @SMVmanager
Created11 December 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/slavchelovek

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46,44547,02646,735.57 August 2026 — 47,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,023 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,017 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,008 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,989 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,975 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,962 subscribers14 August 2026 — 46,944 subscribers15 August 2026 — 46,936 subscribers16 August 2026 — 46,924 subscribers17 August 2026 — 46,912 subscribers18 August 2026 — 46,897 subscribers19 August 2026 — 46,879 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,856 subscribers22 August 2026 — 46,841 subscribers23 August 2026 — 46,813 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,805 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,781 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,774 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,758 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,744 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,733 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,717 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,700 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,688 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,666 subscribers5 September 2026 — 46,637 subscribers8 September 2026 — 46,598 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,555 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,533 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,518 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,478 subscribers19 September 2026 — 46,445 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -581. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,358–47,113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:0146,445-33
16 Sept 2026, 18:0146,478-40
14 Sept 2026, 17:5946,518-15
13 Sept 2026, 05:2046,533-22
11 Sept 2026, 04:2046,555-43
8 Sept 2026, 10:1846,598-39
5 Sept 2026, 04:4046,637-29
3 Sept 2026, 12:4146,666-22
2 Sept 2026, 06:3346,688-12
1 Sept 2026, 09:4646,700-17
31 Aug 2026, 07:5646,717-16
30 Aug 2026, 05:1546,733-11
29 Aug 2026, 05:2446,744-14
28 Aug 2026, 08:2346,758-16
27 Aug 2026, 05:3246,774-7
26 Aug 2026, 05:4346,781-24
25 Aug 2026, 03:1846,805-8
23 Aug 2026, 23:2746,813-28
22 Aug 2026, 10:1846,841-15
20 Aug 2026, 22:3846,856first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.66%
avg views ÷ 46,445 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,490
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held44 (28 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total89,720
Reactions total4,740
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
262
Videos
514
Links
90

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
46m 38s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,899 reactions across 44 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,32633.6%
🤬2,13921.6%
💯1,79218.1%
🔥1,16911.8%
custom 52651072803905354137257.32%
😁2792.82%
👏1491.51%
👎760.768%
😢650.657%
custom 5262866437038421122640.647%
🤯590.596%
🤔260.263%
🤝200.202%
😱100.101%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 44 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slavchelovek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,620 views202 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

От подписчика: Екатеринбург, «старая сортировка». Двор домов Кунарская 14 - Кишиневская 33. 10% русских, остальные мигранты и их дети...

🤬186👎9🤯7

19 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,250 views288 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

В Санкт-Петербурге добрые русские люди поймали мигранта за выслеживанием и домогательством до маленьких детей. «Подошёл к дочке, спросил как зовут, она сразу позвонила мне и сказала, что дядя из другой страны спрашивает её имя. А когда она сказала, что ей нужно домой, он ответил «я тебя люблю» и поцеловал! Ребёнок в ужасе, в слезах». Не оставляйте своих детей одних, особенно если в вашем районе высокая концентрация

🤬277👍9🔥2

17 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC≈2,930 views397 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Депутат Госдумы Михаил Матвеев рассказал о понаехавшем педофиле, изнасиловавшем и убившем пять девочек. Его долгое время не могли найти по причине отсутствия геномной базы всех въезжающих, разговоры о создании которой ведутся уже не одно десятилетие. Интересно то, что в новостях об этом чудовище и его похождениях ни слова, что косвенно свидетельствует о засекречивании резонансных дел, связанных с мигрантами.

💯280🤬117

16 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC≈3,840 views521 reactions11 Starsread 21 September 2026
Video

В Москве мужик отп*здил двух «примерных семьянинов», пристававших к русским девушкам. В Щербинке дикари приставали к девушкам с непристойными предложениями, а когда получили отказ - начали их лапать. За девушек заступился местный житель, щедро накидавший бабуинам п*здюлей. В округе он был не единственный русский, были и другие «мужчинки», просто стоявшие поодаль и безучастно наблюдавшие. Чем всё закончилось - неизве

👍411custom 526510728039053541360👏34🔥9🤬7

31 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈6,000 views478 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Необходимо провести среди приезжих получивших наши паспорта мобилизацию на СВО. Чтоб они на деле доказали, что они за Россию!

👍313💯144🤬17👏4

29 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈6,200 views364 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Мы помним в чём сила и кто нам не брат.

🔥268👍60custom 526510728039053541333💯3

29 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC≈5,580 views27 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Forwarded from @MuzzpycFile

File, posted without a caption

🔥22👍5

29 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈5,670 views311 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Пригород Санкт-Петербурга, мигрант решил, что в Русских городах можно вести себя как по кайфу и ссать в общественном месте у всех на виду...

🤬302😁5👍3😱1

28 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈5,260 views493 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

В Санкт-Петербурге двое парней задержали неадекватного мигранта, разгуливавшего с ножом около детей в парке. Один из ребят вышел на пробежку в Никольском парке, обратил внимание на среднеазиата в форме с ножом в руках, тёршегося около группы женщин с детьми. Он тут же позвонил своему другу и они вдвоём его быстро нейтрализовали, а затем сдали прибывшим сотрудникам полиции. Кстати, обоих зовут Илья.

👍389custom 526510728039053541349🔥44👏11

28 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC≈5,430 views250 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Сергей Доренко 10 лет назад как в воду глядел: "А вы ждёте того, что вам придётся продать квартиру в вашем районе, потому что это будет не ваш район? Неужели вы не думали, что вас начнут потихоньку вытеснять? Неужели вы не знали, что вас начнут потихоньку замещать? А что вы скажете насчёт того, что таджики будут делать вам ваших внуков? Да что там внуков. Что вы скажете, когда таджики будут делать вам ваших детей? Т

👍125💯107🤯6👏5🔥5custom 52628664370384211222

28 Aug 2026, 05:50 UTC≈4,290 views79 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Не пытайтесь сделать «на улице» то, что еще никогда не делали хотя бы в зале. В идеале ваш арсенал должен состоять из приемов, хотя бы раз принесших вам победу. Это ваш бесценный капитал, он с вами до гробовой доски, его даже пропить будет сложно, потому что ваш, потому что достался вам в бою, пусть даже спортивном, но бою, где перед вами был реальный противник, и он реально рухнул. Слова из книги "Мужик с топором".

👍78custom 52651072803905354131

27 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈4,250 views307 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Посмотрели бы такое кино? 😅 Да - 👍🏻 Нет - 👎🏻

👍246👎36😁23custom 52651072803905354132

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @slavchelovek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTCAnonymous Poll578 voters

Вы за отмену статьи 282 или против?

  1. За, эту статью нужно отменить.90%
  2. Против отмены, пусть будет.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTCAnonymous Poll661 voters

Нужно ли запретить продажу алкогольных напитков в черте города?

  1. Да, отраву за поселения!65%
  2. Нет, не нужно.36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СЛАВЯНСКИЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК” (@slavchelovek), 46,445 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slavchelovek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.