Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sleepring

Channel

sleepring

@sleepring_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,673subscribers

-7,319 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002584427482
TypeChannel
Username@sleepring_official
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sleepring_official

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,86618,99214,9297 August 2026 — 18,992 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,870 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,811 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,745 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,389 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,347 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,791 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,732 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,472 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,351 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,306 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,693 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,663 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,566 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,866 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,138 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,278 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,283 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,351 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,281 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,243 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,176 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,246 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,070 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,943 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,748 subscribers7 September 2026 — 11,993 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,194 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,899 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,482 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,526 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,581 subscribers29 September 2026 — 11,673 subscribers11,6737 August 202629 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net -7,319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,647–20,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 01:2011,673-908
18 Sept 2026, 00:5912,581+55
15 Sept 2026, 23:5812,526+1,044
14 Sept 2026, 08:2111,482-417
12 Sept 2026, 16:5611,899-295
10 Sept 2026, 19:3812,194+201
7 Sept 2026, 17:1911,993-755
4 Sept 2026, 21:2012,748+805
3 Sept 2026, 05:5411,943-127
2 Sept 2026, 03:3212,070+824
1 Sept 2026, 03:2611,246+70
31 Aug 2026, 00:1711,176-67
30 Aug 2026, 02:1611,243-38
29 Aug 2026, 04:3411,281-70
28 Aug 2026, 04:2411,351+68
27 Aug 2026, 06:2711,283+5
26 Aug 2026, 08:0211,278+140
25 Aug 2026, 06:0611,138+272
24 Aug 2026, 05:0410,866-4,700
22 Aug 2026, 13:5815,566first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 11,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held44 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total5,380
Reactions total332
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 48s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,804 reactions across 40 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍86818.1%
❤79416.5%
🔥63413.2%
🎉59612.4%
🤩52410.9%
😁2635.47%
🥰2605.41%
💯2394.98%
❤‍🔥2104.37%
😍2074.31%
👏1753.64%
👌170.354%
🙏60.125%
🤣40.083%
💋30.062%
🍾20.042%
🏆10.021%
👀10.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,804 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:51 UTC≈1,170 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📌 Эстеты, все сюда! Любите Pinterest? Можете часами листать красивые пины? Мы тоже любим, поэтому и там создали страничку. Подписывайтесь!

❤13🤩10🎉6👍4😁4👌1🥰1

2 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,620 views133 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

☔️ В дождь хочется спать сильнее? Замечали, что порой под дождь будто выключается батарейка? Ученые это подтверждают. В обзорной статье «Свет, сон и циркадные ритмы: снова вместе»исследователи из британского Гилфорда объясняют, как свет регулирует наши циркадные ритмы — внутренние биологические часы. Свет, попадающий на сетчатку глаза, передаёт мозгу сигнал о времени суток и влияет на выработку мелатонина. Чем мен…

🤩28❤27🔥20🎉18👍18😁18💯3👏1

1 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,390 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❗️sleepring-2 — в списке крутых технических новинок этой осени Наше кольцо попало в подборку мужского издания о фитнесе, здоровье и технологиях Men Today. Вот что пишут о sleepring-2: «Кольцо позволяет дистанционно сделать фотографию или переключить музыкальный трек, не касаясь экрана. Пользователи Android также могут перелистывать короткие видео движением пальца. Кольцо весит всего 2,9 грамма и представлено в дву…

🤩29❤21🔥17👍14🎉13😁10👌5🏆1

1 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,200 views50 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Наталья (764452254)

🤩14😁14🎉10❤5🔥4👍3

31 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,120 views184 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🗓️Вспомните сегодняшнее утро — утро понедельника… Сон сильно меняет людей, правда? Без него появляются синяки под глазами, ранние морщины и усталость. Но с режимом сна каждый день вы будете чувствовать себя самыми счастливыми 🤍

😁40🤩37👍32🎉30❤25🔥20

31 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC323 views122 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍃 С наступающим! Завтра 1 сентября. Школьников поздравляем, родителям — соболезнуем! Впрочем, чтобы не было мучительно больно загонять школьника в кровать, подготовили несколько советов для заботливых родителей. Хороший сон — залог успешной учебы! А вы ждете первое сентября?

❤26👍24😁21🤩20🎉14🔥13💯4

29 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC411 views106 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❗️Спорт и сон Качество сна напрямую зависит от того, как мы двигаемся в течение дня. В карточках разобрали, какой спорт для какого времени подходит и чем полезен. Напоминаем, что кольцо sleepring считает шаги, следит за давлением и уровнем кислорода в крови, а значит, это необходимая штука для всех, кто ведет активный образ жизни и следит за здоровьем.

❤22🤩22😁19👍18🎉13🔥9💯2👌1

28 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,080 views311 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💍 МОЯ ПРЕЛЕСТЬ: РАЗЫГРЫВАЕМ УМНОЕ КОЛЬЦО sleepring-2 Выиграйте кольцо, которое знает о вашем сне больше, чем вы. sleepring-2 следит за сном и восстановлением, считает пульс и активность, измеряет уровень кислорода и температуру кожи. А еще умеет управлять смартфоном с помощью жестов! Как принять участие? 1️⃣Подпишитесь на каналы Здоровье на Спортсе и sleepring. 2️⃣Нажмите кнопку «Хочу кольцо!» под этим постом. 3️⃣П…

❤96👍76😁50🔥44🤩26🎉19

27 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈2,340 views127 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

💤 Сон – главный источник сил (и не только) Хороший сон: — помогает мозгу восстановиться за ночь; — стабилизирует все гормоны, в том числе те, что отвечают за чувство голода; — способствует сохранению упругости кожи. И это лишь малая часть того, какой эффект оказывает сон на наш организм 🤍

👍35❤26😁23🎉21🔥14🤩7💯1

27 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC≈2,080 views208 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

❓Почему надо знать показатели сна? Ученые из Великобритании научили искусственный интеллект анализировать исследования сна — и обнаружили, что по тому, как человек спит, можно заметить очень тонкие изменения в работе организма. ИИ смотрел не на одну цифру вроде продолжительности сна, а сразу на множество параметров: дыхание, сердцебиение, активность мозга, движения тела. Когда исследователи проверили данные более …

❤47🎉38🔥36😁33👍29🤩21💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @sleepring_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Говорят, люди делятся на два типа… Выбирайте свой вариант!

  1. Сплю, полностью укрывшись одеялом84%
  2. Постоянно раскрываюсь18%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Худеете сейчас?

  1. Да (как обычно)52%
  2. Нет, я и так — совершенство!13%
  3. Нет, а надо бы16%
  4. Я и так стройный и счастливый29%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Скоро обед понедельника. Проснулись?

  1. Ну естественно! К обеду пора бы!43%
  2. Что? Уже обед? Или мне это снится?14%
  3. В понедельник мой mood — это сонная муха43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sleepring” (@sleepring_official), 11,673 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sleepring_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.