Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СПЛЕТНИ КНИЖНЫХ ФЛУДОВ

Channel

СПЛЕТНИ КНИЖНЫХ ФЛУДОВ

@sletniknigi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003767382145
TypeChannel
Username@sletniknigi
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sletniknigi

Growth

112127119.511 August 2026 — 127 subscribers12 August 2026 — 125 subscribers20 August 2026 — 123 subscribers2 September 2026 — 116 subscribers11 September 2026 — 114 subscribers18 September 2026 — 112 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:01112-2
11 Sept 2026, 09:15114-2
2 Sept 2026, 03:33116-7
20 Aug 2026, 03:57123-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:58125-2
11 Aug 2026, 23:46127first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026

Анон: какие щас активные флуды и где можно влиться?

Signed ㅤˊmarllinee🪽

9 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

все прочитал, я вахуе ребятки

1

Signed илья ⁶⁷

8 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC76 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

неанон блядская: продолжение. Дальше — с лица Арии и её слов: «Да, идеи не наши, но, блять, нахуя? Им так сложно найти самим другие идеи, как‑то отличаться от других флудов или что? Они буквально зашли к нам на акк и спиздили 4 видео». Это безумно смешно! Как же жалко на них смотреть. Ангельские подсосы, у вас будут вопросы?? В общем, пора дела ладить, а не хуй гладить. Но, видимо, хуи гладить — это любимое занятие

5

Signed илья ⁶⁷

8 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC76 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

неанон блядская: Святые упыри! С вами вновь блядская и её рубрика „Наслышаны“ Не думала, что мы с вами ещё встретимся, но всё же. Наши встречи не случайны. Сегодня у нас разборки между Майерсами и Ангельскими. Я буду выступать в качестве адвоката Майерсов. Что ж, начинаем. Весь конфликт начался примерно вовсе недавно. Конфликт — свежее, новоиспечённого хлеба! Всё началось с того, как Аделин и Стефано срали и срут (?

4

Signed илья ⁶⁷

8 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

бригаду почему под видео с "закрытыми" ангельскими пишут данные коменты. что за нафиг блин. (стеф прекрати доить своих ангельских,они должны были закрыться после позора)

Signed илья ⁶⁷

8 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC61 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

постояшки данного флуда, себитесь отсюда, вы уже заебали

3

Signed 𝐓𝐀̷̸̲𝐓𝐔𝐌̏’

8 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026

я думаю это уже по приколу кидает кто-то из их же учасников

Signed 𝐓𝐀̷̸̲𝐓𝐔𝐌̏’

8 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026

Это же пиздец какие обидные оски

Signed ㅤˊmarllinee🪽

8 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC64 viewsread 11 August 2026

У них на такие оскорбления просто ответа нет, вот и пишут

Signed ㅤˊmarllinee🪽

8 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC69 viewsread 11 August 2026

не то что оскорбление, а то что люди блять пишет в анон из за всякой хуйни блят. что мне делать меня обосрали во флуде. ну бл, поплачь. нахуя в анон жаловаться сразу

Signed илья ⁶⁷

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sletniknigi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СПЛЕТНИ КНИЖНЫХ ФЛУДОВ” (@sletniknigi), 112 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sletniknigi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.