Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elijah Schaffer

Channel

Elijah Schaffer

@slightlyoffensive

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,818subscribers

-331 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001301504542
TypeChannel
Username@slightlyoffensive
Created26 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/slightlyoffensive

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8188,1497,983.56 August 2026 — 8,149 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,149 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,148 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,136 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,094 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,055 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,043 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,018 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,989 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,977 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,964 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,939 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,899 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,842 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,818 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net -331. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,768–8,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 09:567,818-24
11 Sept 2026, 17:197,842-57
7 Sept 2026, 01:577,899-40
2 Sept 2026, 17:347,939-25
30 Aug 2026, 23:387,964-13
28 Aug 2026, 03:047,977-12
25 Aug 2026, 00:547,989-29
21 Aug 2026, 21:368,018-25
18 Aug 2026, 19:138,043-12
15 Aug 2026, 20:358,055-39
12 Aug 2026, 06:488,094-42
9 Aug 2026, 07:518,136-12
6 Aug 2026, 15:478,148-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:198,149no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:518,149first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 30 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.29%
avg views ÷ 7,818 subscribers
Avg views / post
570
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held37 (30 January 202624 August 2026)
Views total3,418
Reactions total211
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 31s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,152 reactions across 35 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥴19216.7%
🤡19016.5%
🔥1099.46%
💩1028.85%
💯716.16%
👍655.64%
👏625.38%
🤣474.08%
373.21%
353.04%
🦄272.34%
😁211.82%
👎171.48%
👌161.39%
💅141.22%
😈141.22%
🤮141.22%
😱131.13%
😢121.04%
🙉100.868%
24 further kinds847.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC531 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

IMPORTANT CAPTION:‼️ “Would you k*ll for your child?” Children under 13 are disproportionately m*rdered by their mothers vs fathers & nearly all infanticide not counting abortion is done by mothers. But that is mostly women too and they know it’s murder but still don’t care. Single mothers are 23% of families but account for 80% of single parent homes due to family court auto awarding women custody despite data sho

🥴13👍5💩2🔥2🤓2

24 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC494 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🦄15🤡6👏5❤‍🔥2🥴21👍1🤮1

24 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC658 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

It’s rough out there these days. Stay safe before the air conditioning or paid bills get you when you least expect it!

🤣22🥴17🦄8🤡2😁2

23 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC584 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥴23🤡5💅3😁2

23 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC579 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Dear men👨, I see you 💔. You’re not perfect👌🏻but you’re trying your best 💯. You are more than just a piggy bank 🏦 and set of hands 🙌. You are divinely masculine 😇 and the wizards 🧙 across middle earth are casting spells 🪄 of protection to guide you out of Mordor 🔥 #MenInWomensFields

🥴205🤡2🔥1🤨1🦄1

23 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC572 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥴20😁12🤡3💩2💯2

23 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC636 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤡16🤝10💯8👏5👎1🤬1

21 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC728 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

What’s your body count? Gen Z edition

🥴21🤡6🦄3😁3💅2👍1🥰1😎1

21 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC702 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

An Aires always protects his cubs. Who saw the original? To all my pappa bears out there, the kids are dressed, bills are paid, cars clean, roof over their heads - you got this DADDA. Lmao

🥴19🤣14👏2💩2🤡2🙏21

19 Aug 2026, 23:52 UTC920 views68 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

People who only focus on politics live a vapid existence Focusing solely on a system you cannot change leads to despair Stay balanced: explore the arts, study, write, acquire health & connect w/ God LIFE IS BEAUTIFULLY TRAGIC YET SO MUCH MORE THAN NEGATIVE SOCIAL MEDIA ALGORITHMS Working around the swamp the last decade cost me more than just lawyer fees & burned bridges At times I’ve lost my soul. The world can

👍20🥴17💯126🤣4🙏3🤡2😇2

17 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC970 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

The administration class is fully in charge of the Luigi Mangione case

🤡29💊3🤮3👍1

14 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,320 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Israel is spending millions to influence an American constituency it once took for granted: young conservatives. In “Renting The Right”, Nicholas Redmann examines the $46.5 million Brad Parscale influence contract, its ties to conservative media and AI, and why the effort may be accelerating the very distrust it was designed to stop. Read the full investigation: https://www.rifttv.com/renting-the-right/

🔥1311🥴5🏆2🤮2🌭1🤣1

Signed Elijah Schaffer

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @slightlyoffensive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elijah Schaffer” (@slightlyoffensive), 7,818 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slightlyoffensive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.