Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for S LUPOU

Channel

S LUPOU

@slupou

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003232097142
TypeChannel
Username@slupou
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/slupou

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

288293290.56 August 2026 — 290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 290 subscribers13 August 2026 — 291 subscribers27 August 2026 — 288 subscribers4 September 2026 — 293 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 04:40293+5
27 Aug 2026, 23:32288-3
13 Aug 2026, 23:17291+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:02290no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:36290first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3657.1%
🔥1625.4%
🤬812.7%
34.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablogPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👍1

2 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablogPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

2 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC37 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablog

🚨 ČIERNY VÝJAZD VČERA. ČIERNY „SECURITY“ DNES. ⚫👕 📓 Kedysi bol rozpis služieb vraj stolnotenisový turnaj. Dnes je čierny biletár vraj dobrovoľník. 👇 Ešte raz sa vraciam k tejto téme. Kedysi, ešte na dnes už zaniknutom Okresnom súde Bratislava III, prebiehalo pojednávanie s členmi zločineckej skupiny sýkorovcov. ⚖️ Prípad sa týkal vyberania výpalného v dnes už neexistujúcom bratislavskom podniku U Matúša. 🍺 💥 Podľ

👍5

31 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC90 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablog

https://slupou.sk/2026/06/13/diskusia-santa-kubina-ocistec/

👍5

31 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC59 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablogPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

31 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @piranablog

🚨 DEBATU ELITNÉHO PROKURÁTORA ŠANTU S ELITNÝM ADVOKÁTOM KUBINOM V PODNIKU PRAŽOVŇA STRÁŽIL ČIERNY BILETÁR. ⚫🕴️ SÁM SA OZNAČIL ZA „SECURITY DOBROVOĽNÍKA“. 👕🛡️ ⚫ Niekto má čierny výjazd v rozsudku, iný v obžalobe a ďalší v uznesení o vznesení obvinenia. A niekto má zasa čierneho biletára 🕴️, ktorý stráži debatu prokurátora Generálnej prokuratúry SR Jána Šantu, zastupujúceho prokuratúru v kauze Očistec, s advokátom Pet

👍7

27 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC≈8,050 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dobrý deň, nech sa páči nový článok 👇 🚨 KAUZA KAJÚCNIK: ĎURKA MAL BYŤ NARAZ NA DVOCH MIESTACH ⚖️ Podľa uznesenia inšpekcie mal vyšetrovateľ NAKA Pavol Ďurka v rovnakom čase vykonávať procesný úkon na mieste činu v Moste pri Bratislave aj v kancelárii policajného prezídia v Bratislave. 📄 Uznesenie zároveň opisuje ďalšie podrobnosti o preverovaní výpovede kajúcnika Petra Kaňucha z kauzy takáčovci. 👇 https://slupou

🔥7

26 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,340 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dobrý deň, nech sa páči nový článok 👉 🚨 CHRÁNENÝ SVEDOK ZO SLOVENSKA IDE V CHORVÁTSKU PRED SÚD Súd v Zadare prijal obžalobu proti Slovákovi Antonovi Fischerovi, ktorý mal pôvodne meno Anton Cvešper v kauze vraždy podnikateľa Alexa Burkova pri ostrove Molat. ⚖️ Telo obete dodnes nenašli. 👉 https://slupou.sk/2026/07/26/anton-fischer-vrazda-molat-sud/

👍5

25 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC≈9,120 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dobrý deň, nech sa páči nový článok 👇 🚨 NOVÉ OBVINENIE ČURILLOVCOV V KAUZE KAJÚCNIK 🚔 Vyšetrovateľ Úradu inšpekčnej služby rozšíril obvinenie voči Pavlovi Ďurkovi a ďalším policajtom v kauze Kajúcnik. 📌 Prípad súvisí s preverovaním výpovede kajúcnika Petra Kaňucha z kauzy údajných takáčovcov. 👇 https://slupou.sk/2026/07/25/nove-obvinenie-curillovcov-kauza-kajucnik/

🔥9👍6

19 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈1,940 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dobrý deň, nech sa páči nový článok👇 AKO ČURILLOVCI ULOVILI KAJÚCNIKA MAKÓA? 🔎 ❓ Sedí časová os vyšetrovania údajnej prípravy vraždy Jána Čurillu? 📑 V analýze porovnávam policajné dokumenty, uznesenia, výpovede a ďalšie dostupné podklady. Poukazujem na rozpory, ktoré podľa môjho názoru ovplyvnili nielen prípad kajúcnika Ľudovíta Makóa, ale aj ďalšie významné trestné kauzy. 🔗 Odkaz na článok👇 https://slupou.sk/202

🤬8

14 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,140 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dobrý večer, nech sa páči nový článok👇 PREČO KAJÚCNIK MAKÓ PRIŠIEL O BENEFITY? ⚖️ Prečo sa z kajúcnika stal obvinený? Prečo prokuratúra obnovila jeho trestné stíhanie v kauze Den Braven? A akú úlohu v tom zohral prípad údajného úplatku pre exšéfa SIS Vladimíra Pčolinského? 📌 V analýze prinášam nové súvislosti, dokumenty a vysvetlenie, prečo sa procesné postavenie Ľudovíta Makóa výrazne zmenilo v dvoch prípadoch.

👍73

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @slupou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S LUPOU” (@slupou), 293 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slupou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.