Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дубынина 🍒

Channel

Дубынина 🍒

@slushaya_serdcem

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,685subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742783976
TypeChannel
Username@slushaya_serdcem
Created14 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/slushaya_serdcem

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6852,7212,7037 August 2026 — 2,720 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,720 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,712 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,720 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,721 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,718 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,712 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,705 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,701 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,693 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,689 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,685 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,680–2,726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:402,685-4
12 Sept 2026, 08:372,689-4
8 Sept 2026, 05:572,693-8
2 Sept 2026, 22:062,701-4
30 Aug 2026, 16:342,705-7
27 Aug 2026, 21:542,712-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:182,718-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:262,721+1
13 Aug 2026, 15:462,720+8
10 Aug 2026, 20:242,712-8
7 Aug 2026, 13:322,720no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:552,720first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

491 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24549.9%
❤‍🔥11222.8%
🔥8918.1%
👍193.87%
👏102.04%
🍓40.815%
💯40.815%
🤩40.815%
30.611%
🥰10.204%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC669 views151 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Слов пока нет. Но есть картинки. 🐻

❤‍🔥5844🔥35👍7🤩42👏1

11 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,220 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Рассказываю в видео о силе желаний)) В Мурманске сегодня лето 😘

53❤‍🔥12🔥10👍3🥰1

10 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,080 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @visevryukovaVideo

Одежда создаёт человека. Где проходит граница между выражением личности и ее конструированием? Ответ на это вопрос прозвучал вчера во время дискуссии

❤‍🔥18🔥114

10 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC991 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все, конечно, пошло не по плану. Неожиданно сократили тайминг, эксперты мои не успели высказаться по нескольким важным пунктам. Нам не дали время на фотографии со зрителями, а Профессор ринулся по привычке в зал. Пришлось его срочно эвакуировать и получить в спину хамские выкрики от экзальтированного мужчины. Профессор потом, уже дома, принёс мне тёплого молока, за вредность работы. Соблюдаем безопасность труда)) Н

31❤‍🔥14🔥9

7 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC≈1,060 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Не смотрите на тренды, пишите то, о чем невозможно не писать, о чем все время думаете," - поделилась Катя Качур на встрече с читателями в Читай-городе. Обожаю Катины книги, особенно "Любимчик эпохи" и "Желчный ангел". С упоением слушала их в аудиоформате в прошлом году и очень рекомендую к прочтению. Новую "Копия Веры" отложила себе на отпуск. Хочется уже поскорее оказаться в самолёте и открыть книгу. Истории тро

24🔥4💯31

6 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А вы в каком лагере?

  1. Списки - мое все. И список дел на отпуск тоже25%
  2. Свобода от задач, никаких списков, даже мысленных15%
  3. Списки на бумаге не пишу, но в голове они есть. По пунктам знаю, что еще нужно сделать22%
  4. Стараюсь ничего не планировать на время отдыха. Пусть все идёт своим чередом33%
  5. Без плана и отдыха не получится!19%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,080 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Поймала себя на желании написать список дел на отпуск. Даже блокнот открыла и занесла ручку над страницей. Но остановилась. Что-то не то. Превращать отдых в список задач, пусть даже приятных, не хочется. Когда начинается привычное "съездить на море перезагрузиться" или сходить на массаж, восстановиться для работы", смысл этого отдыха теряется. Для чего я в этом мире? - спрашивается. - Для работы? А хочется... пожит

31❤‍🔥10🔥8👍3💯1

2 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,240 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чувствую себя примерно так. Вчера полежала под капельницей, подумала о жизни)) Сегодня с утра составила список вещей в отпуск, радостей лета и перенесла все несрочные дела на потом. До отпуска 9 дней, 2 экзамена, 3 лекции, одна из них большая публичная, поездка дочки в выездную школу и заплатить налоги. Сегодня по плану сделать причёску, выпить айс-латте с карамелью и презентация книги (не нашей, иду как гость нак

34👏9🍓4🔥2

23 Jun 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,380 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лето выдалось жарким в плане работы. В самом разгаре челлендж про мозг и одежду, лекции, пара конференций и подготовка к новым для нас форматам выступлений. Это не считая моих экзаменов в Школе продюсирования и домашних забот. Списки дел и задач бурлят, кипят и выплескиваются из ежедневника. Ответа на вопрос, как я это все успеваю - нет. Как-то успеваю. Видимо, по методу сороконожки: не задумываться о движении ног,

24🔥10👍6

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @slushaya_serdcem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTCAnonymous Poll158 voters

А вы в каком лагере?

  1. Списки - мое все. И список дел на отпуск тоже25%
  2. Свобода от задач, никаких списков, даже мысленных15%
  3. Списки на бумаге не пишу, но в голове они есть. По пунктам знаю, что еще нужно сделать22%
  4. Стараюсь ничего не планировать на время отдыха. Пусть все идёт своим чередом33%
  5. Без плана и отдыха не получится!19%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дубынин о мозге 🧠
@dubininvaofficial · 44,337
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Татьяна Черниговская
@tvchernigovskya · 110,439
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Наталья Жукова²
@NatalliaZhukova2 · 49,671
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дубынина 🍒” (@slushaya_serdcem), 2,685 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slushaya_serdcem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.