Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,812. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,981–25,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 23:18
23,253
-19
6 Nov 2026, 21:41
23,272
-39
5 Nov 2026, 22:40
23,311
-15
5 Nov 2026, 01:57
23,326
-16
4 Nov 2026, 05:01
23,342
-18
3 Nov 2026, 05:06
23,360
-23
2 Nov 2026, 03:06
23,383
-13
31 Oct 2026, 23:45
23,396
-20
31 Oct 2026, 00:06
23,416
-14
29 Oct 2026, 23:07
23,430
-6
29 Oct 2026, 01:48
23,436
-21
27 Oct 2026, 23:46
23,457
-12
27 Oct 2026, 00:29
23,469
-19
26 Oct 2026, 01:26
23,488
-23
24 Oct 2026, 23:15
23,511
-10
23 Oct 2026, 23:50
23,521
-19
22 Oct 2026, 22:01
23,540
-20
21 Oct 2026, 22:28
23,560
-19
20 Oct 2026, 16:46
23,579
-19
19 Oct 2026, 17:39
23,598
first reading
Engagement
297 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.05%
avg views ÷ 23,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
710
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 297 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 89 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
297 (2 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
75,999
Reactions total
1,593
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,356 reactions across 257 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,099
76.5%
💔
1,257
23.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 258 of the 297 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,356 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 297 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 107 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я изменил жене. Она узнала. Ничего не сказала, просто 5 минут смотрела на меня с глазами наполненными болью. Ночью я слышал, как она плачет. После того, как она затихла, я со спокойной душой лег спать. На утро я проснулся, подошел к ней, а она не дышит.
Ненавижу себя. Сегодня ровно год, как ее нет. У нее были проблемы с сердцем и я знал, но все равно как урод пошел на поводу своей пятиминутной слабости. Мы столько пе…
В детстве, когда мне было еще 7 лет, я ждал свою маму укутавшись в своё одеяло. Я не мог уснуть, потому что она задержалась до поздна и мне до жути было одиноко.
Позже я узнаю, что она погибла той ночью. У нее были серьезные проблемы с сердцем, но перед тем как покинуть этот мир, она успела записать голосовое сообщение. Она плакала и говорила то, как сильно она меня любит.. эту запись мне давали слушать спустя год ил…
💘 Reel Ai — ᴦᴇнᴇᴩᴀция ʙидᴇᴏ и ɸᴏᴛᴏ ᴨᴩяʍᴏ ʙ Tᴇlᴇgrᴀʍ
Зᴀᴦᴩужᴀᴇɯь ɸᴏᴛᴏ → ʙыбиᴩᴀᴇɯь ᴩᴇжиʍ иᴧи ᴨиɯᴇɯь ᴄʙᴏй ᴄцᴇнᴀᴩий → ᴨᴏᴧучᴀᴇɯь ᴩᴇɜуᴧьᴛᴀᴛ ʙ ᴧичᴋу
🔞 Оᴋᴏᴧᴏ 1000 ᴩᴇжиʍᴏʙ дᴧя ɸᴏᴛᴏ и ʙидᴇᴏ
♾ Пᴩᴏдᴧᴇниᴇ ᴦᴏᴛᴏʙᴏᴦᴏ ʙидᴇᴏ дᴏ бᴇᴄᴋᴏнᴇчнᴏᴄᴛи
🔗 Гᴏᴛᴏʙыᴇ ᴄюжᴇᴛы и цᴇᴨᴏчᴋи иɜ ᴩᴀɜных ᴩᴇжиʍᴏʙ
🔞 И это лишь малая часть того, что можно создать. В самом приложении тебя ждут куда более смелые возможности 😈
👇ПЕРЕЙТИ В ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ👇
Умейте ждать свою любовь
Умейте ждать свою любовь
Тигринка
Умейте ждать свою любовь
В мороз, жару и непогоду,
Не отравив неверьем кровь
Умейте ждать… пусть даже годы..
Она найдется, не спеши,
Издалека придет, иль рядом,
Пересекутся две души,
Едва соприкоснувшись взглядом…
И закружится голова
От предвкушения и счастья…
И взмоют ввысь любви слова…
Разгонят тучи и ненастье…
И отогреется душа
Замерзнувшая в ожиданье.
…
Моя мама всегда вкyснo гoтoвила, но oднажды вечерoм oна пoставила перед oтцoм тарелкy с гoрелым пирoгoм.
Не прoстo пoдгoрелым, а черным, как уголек. Я сидел и ждал, чтo папа скажет oб этoм, нo oн прoстo съел свoй пирoг и спрoсил, как прoшел мoй день. Потом я yслышал как мама извинялась перед папoй за неyдачный yжин. И я никoгда не забyдy егo oтвет: «Милая, мне пoнравился твoй пирoг» Позже я спрoсил егo, правдy ли oн …
Моя последняя любовь…
Так удивительно, так мило.
Как закипала моя кровь,
Как кровь неистово бурлила!
Твои зелёные глаза,
Твои божественные плечи…
Я должен был тебе сказать
Про всё, про всё в последний вечер.
Что лишь тебя боготворю,
Других и знать я не желаю;
Что всю любовь, что есть, мою
Тебе единственной вручаю.
Что без тебя не проживу:
Ты смысл, надежда и отрада;
Что, просто, без тебя умру,
Жизнь без тебя была …
У меня завтра свадьба, придёшь?
-Сказал он со слезами на глазах.
- Свадьба? Как я рада за тебя!
А почему ты плачешь? свадьба - это же так здорово..
- Ты придёшь? Я буду ждать. прошу, приходи!
- Конечно, я приду, ты что, как я могу пропустить свадьбу лучшего друга. Ты же мне как брат..
- Сказала она, опустив голову.
Настал день свадьбы. Её нет. он ждал её. На следующий день он слышит по новостям, что вчера ночью в ква…
Почти всë детство я проводила у бабушки и дедушки на даче. Честно говоря, я боялась туда ездить, только из-за суровости деда. Он был всегда угрюмый, много ворчал, ругался. Я его боялась, не верила, что он любит меня и что нужна ему.
время шло, я взрослела и забывала про бабушку с дедушкой, но находила время заехать, погостить. Дедушка не менял свой нрав, и я перестала выходить с ним на контакт, только из-за вежливост…
Иногда люди жалуются на свою боль. Иногда они ненавидят за эту боль. Иногда они кричат от боли. А иногда им так больно, что у них нет сил ни жаловаться, ни ненавидеть, ни кричать… А со стороны говорят: "Посмотрите, как невозмутим и равнодушен этот человек
❤21
Showing the 12 most recent of 297 posts we hold for @slyubimoy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 19 posts on @slyubimoy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@slyubimoy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hackers named in 3 posts, 13 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
чувство верности @wthlvan · 68,450 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 21 August 2026
ab.soull @absoulluve · 138,668 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
The end. @fory7o · 75,986 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 18 August 2026
amore,amore,amore @ruh_parcassi · 85,690 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
Кусочек счастья 🤍 @happiness00_0 · 120,682 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
лейли нурани @leylinurani · 44,513 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“s'lyubimoy” (@slyubimoy), 23,253 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slyubimoy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.