Channel
@sm_unof
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003716770751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sm_unof |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 14 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sm_unof |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 48 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 47 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 45 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 45 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 46 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 50.0% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Раньше этот аккаунт был официальным каналом члена молодежки ЛДПР Артёма Пинигина АКА Гектора Шпрее. Так вот. Сообщаем, что канал был продан. Теперь это канал Петра Милосердова, который стал членом и главой нашей общины. И тут будет только честная и неподкупная выборная аналитика. Ждите. Подписывайтесь.
Мы не понимаем кто все таки захватил саф, зюганоиды или либертарианцы И может быть эта кампания — план зюганоидов по возвращению саф себе?
Зюганоиды борятся с либертарианцами, реального расклада сил мы не знаем, но либертарианцы в меньшинстве
Либертарианцы известны тем, что обороняются против Возможно они начали эту кампанию чтобы обороняться против коммунистов
КОММУНИСТЫ ПРОТИВ ЛИБЕРТАРИАНСТВА В САФ!!! Студенческий Антифашисткий Фронт был создан левыми персонами, коммунистами, борцами с фашизмом. При поддержке всего левого сообщества они получили свой дофаминовый всплеск. Коммунисты были первыми кто им оказал поддержку, но Кампания против Школы Ильина была просто манипуляцией и игрой на настроениях судя по тому что сейчас в САФ заявляют что "Антифашизм никак не относится …
КОГДА ПРИШЛИ ЗА ТРОЦКИСТАМИ — Я МОЛЧАЛ...
⚡️⚡️Революционная Рабочая партия России внесена в список иноагентов⚡️⚡️ Что самое интересное - несмотря на раскол на 300 партий (одну возглавлял Артём Морозов, в другой неформальным лидером был Иван Антохин, третья откололась и стала МТ, четвертая откололась и стала Рабочей властью, пятая откололась и стала КРДМС), иноагентами признали их все. Видимо, Минюст дрязги в российской оппозиции не интересуют. Всё о полити…
💊4
Цыганская община это молодёжное сообщество.
😎1
Ваш выбор?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Московская КПРФ позорно скатилась в «горбачёвщину» и стала выступать против водки. Которая, как известно, важный элемент Русской Национальной Культуры. На канале Комсомола вышло видео, где девушка в очёчках жалуется что, мол, провокаторы из ЛДПР предлагают ребятам выпить водки и постоять в "нужном месте", коим оказался митинг КПРФ. В чем провокация, честно, не очень понимаем - партия всего лишь исполняет заветы Жир…
Если вы продолжите бороться с трамваем, активисты Цыганской общины будут вынуждены организовать общественную кампанию за трамвай. Бог цыган любит. Поэтому вам стоило бы опасаться нашей кампании за трамвай. Если мы начнём — трамвай точно будет построен.
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sm_unof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ваш выбор?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цыганская община” (@sm_unof), 48 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sm_unof.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.