Schau dir unbedingt die Vorhersage für September an https://youtu.be/h2nyM1e_Cnc?is=9stbyIbML_qz2yHW
❤29👍8🤷2

Channel
@smaranaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,778subscribers
-157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001384889942 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smaranaa |
| Created | 13 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smaranaa |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 8,778 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 8,791 | -18 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 8,809 | -19 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 8,828 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 8,846 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 8,858 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 8,870 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 8,876 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 8,881 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 8,889 | -22 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 8,911 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 8,925 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 8,936 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 8,937 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 8,935 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 8,935 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (13 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,120 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,657 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,331 | 80.3% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 8.81% | |
| 🙏 | 101 | 6.10% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 1.69% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 0.724% | |
| 🤷 | 10 | 0.604% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.483% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.362% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.302% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.181% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 0.181% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 0.121% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.121% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Schau dir unbedingt die Vorhersage für September an https://youtu.be/h2nyM1e_Cnc?is=9stbyIbML_qz2yHW
❤29👍8🤷2
Schaut dieses Video unbedingt an und schreibt mir, wo sir steht. https://youtu.be/s0ytg_VtSX8
❤46👍7🤷1
💕Liebe Seelenreisende, hast du je das Gefühl gehabt, dass etwas in der Welt nicht stimmt, dass unsichtbare Fäden dein Leben lenken? Heute offenbaren wir dir, wie du diese Fäden durchbrechen kannst. Lass dich auf eine spannende Reise in das Unbekannte entführen, wo du lernen kannst, dein inneres Licht leuchten zu lassen. Das Universum hat dir den Schlüssel gegeben, um die konditionierten Muster hinter dir zu lassen. I…
❤20
https://youtu.be/jbGPZKohBsc
👍17❤12
💫Tief in den Alpen, wo die Berge ihre Wurzeln in die Erde senken, liegt Damanhur, ein verborgenes Dorf in Norditalien. Die Menschen dort wissen, dass die Erde atmet. Sie haben unter der Erde einen Tempel of Humankind gebaut, nicht aus Stein allein, sondern aus Licht und Stille. In diesen Hallen fließen die Synchronic Lines, feine Energiebänder, die durch den Boden ziehen wie Adern eines großen Herzens.💕 Einmal, so e…
❤63🙏9
https://youtube.com/shorts/a41a1vq1riU?feature=share
🔥14❤12👍1🤷♂1
Ihr Lieben, spürt ihr das Ziehen der Matrix, wie sie an den Fäden eures Alltags zieht? Heute möchte ich mit euch das Mysterium teilen, das hinter dem Vorhang der Realität verborgen liegt. Viele von uns sehnen sich nach einem Durchbruch, einem Moment der Klarheit, der uns zu unserem wahren Selbst führt. In einer kürzlichen Sitzung offenbarte ein Lichtwesen, dass die Wahrheit manchmal im Unerwarteten liegt. So auch uns…
❤26🙏5
https://youtu.be/OcVwm2DBdO8
❤35🙈2
✨ Wer ist eigentlich Ashtar Sheran? ✨ Fragst du dich auch oft, wer hinter diesem Namen steckt, der immer wieder in spirituellen Kreisen auftaucht? Ist er ein ferner Mythos oder eine reale Präsenz für unsere Zeit? 🛸 Ashtar Sheran ist weit mehr als nur ein Kommandant – er ist ein Hüter der kosmischen Ordnung und Koordinator der Galaktischen Föderation des Lichts. Seine Aufgabe? Den Aufstieg der Erde in die 5. Dimension…
❤28🙏8👍1
Wächter der Erde auf Telegram: t.me/GuardiansofGaia
👍43❤21💯10
Schreibe mir, wie es dir geht und ob du genauso fühlst, wie im Video beschrieben. 💕 https://youtu.be/GeSBp0F1Qlo
❤29🔥7🤔1
💕Kennst du dieses Gefühl, wenn man morgens aufwacht und spürt, dass sich in der Luft etwas verändert hat? Als würde das Leben leise anklopfen und sagen: „Da wartet noch etwas auf dich.“ Genau aus diesem Impuls heraus möchte ich dich heute zu etwas einladen, das mir sehr am Herzen liegt. Ich öffne einen Raum für uns, den „Lichtanker der Plejaden“. 💕Es ist ein kostenloses Webinar, aber eigentlich ist es mehr als das: E…
❤23👍8🙏5🤷♂1
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @smaranaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Smaranaa.eu” (@smaranaa), 8,778 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smaranaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.