Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙎𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙧𝘼𝙧𝙩 ✏️

Channel

𝙎𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙧𝘼𝙧𝙩 ✏️

@snallerart

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

683subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001727016601
TypeChannel
Username@snallerart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/snallerart

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

68369969122 August 2026 — 699 subscribers23 August 2026 — 697 subscribers29 August 2026 — 693 subscribers7 September 2026 — 691 subscribers16 September 2026 — 683 subscribers22 August 202616 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 681–701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:37683-8
7 Sept 2026, 22:20691-2
29 Aug 2026, 14:54693-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:55697-2
22 Aug 2026, 18:30699first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

645 reactions across 15 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
37858.6%
❤‍🔥8713.5%
👍385.89%
🥰385.89%
🐳213.26%
🔥203.10%
😭203.10%
🙏101.55%
🍓81.24%
🤯60.93%
😢50.775%
💘40.62%
🤣40.62%
👎30.465%
🆒10.155%
👏10.155%
💯10.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 645 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 18 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
132
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
109
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snallerart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2025 to 18 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2026, 09:00 UTC840 views18 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

ПРОКЛЯТЫЙ ЗАМОК ПЕРЛ: https://link.brawlstars.com/voucher/e60f302d-7a03-4438-a181-0fc25b8867f2

14🤣4

1 Apr 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,060 views35 reactionsread 22 August 2026

приколов не будет 🤡

😭1813🙏4

23 Feb 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,590 views35 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Ожидаемо, не сегодня 🤷‍♂️ ✏️ Однако поздравляю ребят, а в особенности нашенских @IgaKerudenu и @vitaliy908 и желаю им победы! ⭐ Скины отобрали классные и даже вполне конкурентоспособные. И в заключение, скорее всего это был мой последний концепт по BrawlStars, как и участие в SupercellMake. Подробности на днях ✍️ #SupercellMake

❤‍🔥237👍3😢2

21 Jan 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,760 views51 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✨Справедливость восторжествовала!!! 🥇 Скин стал финалистом, набрав 250 голосов, а пользователь-копирка был забанен разработчиками! ✏️ Остается ждать объявления работ, прошедших в Runner-Up через 14 дней Продолжайте голосовать, если хотите увидеть скин в игре! ✨ #SupercellMake

38❤‍🔥6👍4👏1💯1🆒1

21 Jan 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,240 views34 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🙂🙂🙂 #SupercellMake

23❤‍🔥4👎3🐳2🔥2

21 Jan 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,800 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

✏️ Голосование SupercellMake стартовало! Все желающие могут проголосовать за Пружинного Дага уже сейчас по ссылке ⏬ ✏️ https://make.supercell.com/en/creation/doug-in-the-box-35 #SupercellMake

🐳135❤‍🔥2

8 Jan 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,340 views32 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Что если бы Пружинный Даг имел свой набор пинов? ✨ На этот вопрос ответил @MelonPatchChannel создав концепт своей версии пинов Пружинного Дага! 😁 Напиши свое мнение в комментариях! 💬 Стикеры Telegram 💬✨ #SupercellMake #Концепт #Пины

24❤‍🔥3🥰2🍓1💘1🔥1

6 Jan 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,340 views54 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Скин получилось опубликовать благодаря содействию комьюнити-менеджера Dani ❗ действительно, было трудно определить, какой из них был оригинальным, после такого количества подражателей! извините за это! 🥲🙏 Я полагаю, что одна из ваших заявок была одобрена! вы можете сообщить о поддельных заявках, и мы удалим их до начала голосования Так ответил Dani на пост по поводу ситуации со скином в 💬 Благодаря активности сооб

👍28❤‍🔥149🐳1🥰1🙏1

6 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,200 views48 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

А теперь к сути Кратко: Мою работу не допускают на мейк Более детально: Как вы понимаете этот скин представляет собой доработку моего старого аналогичного скина, выпущенного ещё в 2024 году. Тогда он сыскал большую популярность в сообществе. Сейчас же, пока я делал редизайн для SupercellMake, множество людей (мной насчитано более 20 работ) выложили мою старую работу под своими именами. В настоящее время, команда S

31❤‍🔥8🔥4🐳2🍓1💘1🥰1

5 Jan 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,050 views43 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Важное сообщение Возникла очень трудная и неприятная ситуация с участием в SupercellMake, в которой еще предстоит разобраться. Завтра выложу подробности и детали по ситуации. Будем на связи, спасибо всем❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 #SupercellMake #Важно

25❤‍🔥6😢3🍓2👍2🔥2😭2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @snallerart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бубсер | Новости Бравл Старс
@news_bubser · 38,365
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 30 August 2026
Новости Лайна
@linenews1 · 25,154
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
Cleopatra YouTube
@cleopatra_youtube · 43,735
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
FLYING MINER | BS
@flyingminerr · 53,810
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙎𝙣𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙚𝙧𝘼𝙧𝙩 ✏️” (@snallerart), 683 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snallerart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.