Channel
@snazarau
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
651subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001219824970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @snazarau |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/snazarau |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 651 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 657 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 663 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 674 | -14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 688 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 692 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 692 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334600899211849446 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5336789193639107934 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| custom 5341479834797253402 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5386866128603601868 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5469848839542314983 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5237804624261456311 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5303025957509044342 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5366287741992608878 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5393172210040998195 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5330168669056040955 | 3 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5357301021141923884 | 3 | 5.45% | |
| custom 5388884252131614405 | 3 | 5.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍓🤩🥛 Кажется, я нашла самый хайповый напиток этого лета — клубничный протеиновый коктейль + кофе. Честно, вообще не ожидала, что это сочетание мне настолько понравится. Получается очень необычный, нежный и освежающий вкус. А ещё это не только вкусно, но и полезно, так гораздо легче добрать дневную норму протеина. Теперь понимаю, почему этот напиток так завирусился. 🍾
custom 53346008992118494468custom 53931722100409981954
*️⃣теперь мое любимое комбо для лица 🛍️коллагеновая сыворотка с микроиглами в розовом формате 💌текстура тянущаяся, быстро впитывается, придает гладкость коже, точно теперь хочу попробовать и другие баночки. 🤍тканевые маски с коллагеном и центелой, очень хорошо пропитаны эссенцией, моментально отдают влагу, питают кожу, примерно через 10 минут уже сняла с лица 💞
custom 54698488395423149835custom 53030259575090443424
На сегодня в планах тестировать новинки. 👀 Первым делом попробую коллагеновый бустер с микроиглами. Давно было интересно, как он работает, а теперь наконец дошли руки. Кажется, я хочу себе всю линейку 🥺 И, конечно, маска с центеллой и ниацинамидом, такие штуки у меня никогда долго не залеживаются. 😱 /позже оставлю отзыв
custom 53414798347972534025custom 53367891936391079343
Так приятно увидеть себя на странице бренда 🤩 Решила поделиться этим роликом и с вами, надеюсь, вы не против 🤩 Если честно, сыворотки меня очень удивили. Особенно с коллагеном, по текстуре кажется, будто это нежнейшая пенка, а не сыворотка. Корейцы, как всегда, умеют удивлять и придумывают самые необычные технологии 🤩
custom 53367891936391079344
Вы должны это видеть!🫧 Новая корейская линейка от VT COSMETICS 💋 @daricrew Сыворотки в виде пузырьковой пенки, что то невероятно новое в этой индустрии ❤️🔥🤭
custom 53868661286036018685custom 53888842521316144053
Selfie with cutie 🫶🐐 Вот так мы провели день с животными в +30°C 🫠☀️ Сначала отправились знакомиться с тропическими обитателями, а потом поехали на ферму — гладили, кормили и просто кайфовали от этой атмосферы. Такие дни остаются в памяти надолго 🤍
custom 52378046242614563114custom 53662877419926088784
❤️Сегодняшний день просто вау! Бренд THE U организовал для нас загородный трип и пригласил на базу отдыха, такой формат я всегда особенно люблю. ✨ С самого утра мы отправились в парк птиц, где познакомились с огромным количеством животных. Потом нас вкусно накормили, мы много гуляли, рисовали картины и наслаждались атмосферой. Сейчас уже лежу в уютном домике и буквально засыпаю после такого насыщенного дня. ❤️ За…
custom 53301686690560409553custom 53573010211419238843
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @snazarau. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Snezhana Nazarau | life *ﾟ” (@snazarau), 651 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snazarau.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.