๐ ๐ร๐๐รโ๐ร๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ pinned a photo

Channel
๐ ๐ร๐๐รโ๐ร๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
@sndcanteyit
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
15,425subscribers
-1,546 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003218923922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sndcanteyit |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sndcanteyit |
Topic
Adult โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 15,425 | +13 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 15,412 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 15,421 | -124 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 15,545 | -80 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 15,625 | -42 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 15,667 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 15,672 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 15,689 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:43 | 15,686 | -49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 15,735 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 15,739 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 15,766 | -78 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 15,844 | -125 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 15,969 | -65 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 16,034 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 16,045 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 16,064 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 16,073 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 16,068 | -26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 16,094 | first reading |
Engagement
351 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 1.07%
- avg views รท 15,425 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 165
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.46%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 351 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 351 (29 July 2026 โ 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,975 |
| Reactions total | 82 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29m 37s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
38,091 reactions across 223 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 13,306 | 34.9% | |
| ๐ฅ | 9,313 | 24.4% | |
| ๐ | 5,855 | 15.4% | |
| ๐ | 4,276 | 11.2% | |
| ๐ | 3,278 | 8.61% | |
| ๐ | 270 | 0.709% | |
| ๐พ | 216 | 0.567% | |
| ๐ฑ | 203 | 0.533% | |
| ๐ | 149 | 0.391% | |
| ๐ | 108 | 0.284% | |
| ๐ | 108 | 0.284% | |
| ๐ | 96 | 0.252% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 95 | 0.249% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 85 | 0.223% | |
| ๐ | 83 | 0.218% | |
| ๐ | 68 | 0.179% | |
| ๐คฏ | 60 | 0.158% | |
| ๐ฆ | 56 | 0.147% | |
| ๐ | 52 | 0.137% | |
| ๐คฉ | 47 | 0.123% | |
| 27 further kinds | 367 | 0.963% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 224 of the 351 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 38,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 351 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
๐คช Onylfans Tarzฤฑ Paylaลฤฑmlarฤฑmฤฑ Yaptฤฑฤฤฑm Telegram โคต๏ธ ๐ฅฐ รzerin'de 3 Farklฤฑ ViP Grubuma Sรผresiz Abonelik ๐ฑ โผ๏ธ Sadece 600 TL ๐ฑ Bugรผne รzel iรerikler โฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ ๐ฅ๐ฅ Partnerli Sex ' Lez iรerik ' Solo Video Mast Video ' Show Kesitler ' Oyuncaklฤฑ Video Blowjob Sakso Videolarฤฑm Vb Tรผm iรerikler Mevcut ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ 300'den Fazla iรerik Abonelik iรin Link รzerinden Mesaj 3 ViP Grup iBAN Gรถnder Demeniz Yeterli ๐ ๐ฅ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
๐ฅ3๐พ2๐2๐2โก1โค1โคโ๐ฅ1๐1
๐ซ Gรผnaydฤฑnn Askimm Bugรผn iNdirim Varr ๐ฅ
๐ฅฐ4๐3๐2๐2๐คฏ2๐2๐ฑ2โคโ๐ฅ1
Arkadaลฤฑmฤฑn รผcretsiz kanalฤฑnฤฑ takip edip iletiลim kurabilirsiniz, Sex iรงerikleri, sexting, gรถrรผntรผlรผ gรถrรผลmeler iรงin takip edip mesaj gรถnderebilirsiniz ๐ https://t.me/+sLCPJ-jX5W02NDc0
โค1
Merhaba aลklarฤฑm ben Gizem reel gรถrรผลme yapฤฑyorum ve sฤฑnฤฑrsฤฑz bir kadฤฑnฤฑm sizde benimle gรถrรผลmek ve seks iรงeriklerimi izlemek isterseniz aลaฤฤฑdaki รผcretsiz linkten bana ulaลฤฑn ve mesaj atฤฑn ๐ซ๐ช @gizemliniz https://t.me/+23qrumixuRliZTU0
โค1
Aลkฤฑmฤฑn kanalฤฑnฤฑ takip edin ismimi verene %50 indirmli vip kanali ฤฐรงerikleri kanalda https://t.me/+n9pRnCFlbTExNjJk
Ben alara vip kanal ลuan indirimde 750 yerine 250 โญ๏ธ รcretsiz kanalฤฑm https://t.me/+R9pDOBHvBX45NGI8 Vip kanal linkim https://t.me/+0lrrjnYAjt4xZjI8
๐ฅ1
โค๏ธ๐ Bomba iรerikler mii Neeee ๐ค๐ฎ ๐ฎ Gotik รileฤiniz Sizler iรin Yep Yenii รzell โผ๏ธ ๐ ๐ฃ iรeriklerini ViP Kanalฤฑnda Paylaลฤฑyor Bilgi Detaylarฤฑ โคต๏ธ โฌ๏ธโฌ๏ธ ๐ค Gotik Teyit : https://t.me/gotikcilekteyit ๐ รilek Hesap : @gotikcilek
Posted without readable text
๐ป๐ Selam Ben Aziminiz Hesabฤฑndan Sofia Maria ๐๐ ๐ท๐บ Yarฤฑ Yabancฤฑyฤฑm Ve Yarฤฑ Tรผrkรผm ๐น๐ท iรeriklerim Harika รtesi ๐๐ Ve 1.000'den โซ๏ธ Fazla iรeriฤim Mevcut ลuan ViP Grubum'da ๐ โคต๏ธ ๐คช Katฤฑlฤฑm Bilgisi iรin Aลลaฤฤฑdan Bฤฑraktฤฑฤฤฑm Link รzerinden โคต๏ธ โผ๏ธ Hem Teyit Hesabฤฑma Hem iLetiลim Adresime Ulaลabilirsiniz Muahh ๐๐ฅ iletiลim : @aziminmekani โ teyit : https://t.me/aziminmekaniduyuru
๐ ๐ร๐๐รโ๐ร๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ pinned a video
๐ผฬ๐ฉ๐๐ผฬ๐ ๐ผฬ๐๐ฟ๐ผฬ ๐ฑ๐พ๐ซ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ช๐ฒ ๐ผฬ๐ฬง๐พ๐ฉ ๐๐ฐฬ๐ฎ๐๐ผฬ๐ฏ๐ผฬ๐ ๐๐๐๐ https://t.me/sndcanvip
๐4โคโ๐ฅ3๐3๐ฑ3๐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 351 posts we hold for @sndcanteyit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@gotikcilekteyit ยท 1,80830 postsAzimin Mekanฤฑ | Duyuru ๐ชโจ
@aziminmekaniduyuru ยท 2,22215 postsalara Teyit Ve iรงerik Kanalฤฑm
@BenAlara ยท 5845 postsMihaela rzhevsky
@krystalmihaela1 ยท 1,6445 postsQueen ๐โค๏ธ
@evadivaniz ยท 2,1294 postsรigdemm
@cigdemmabone ยท 5,3931 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sndcanteyit named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 6 posts, 11 August 2026 โ 3 September 2026 ยท confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 โ 11 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 โ 8 August 2026 ยท confirmed gone 1 October 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 โ 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ ๐ร๐๐รโ๐ร๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐โ (@sndcanteyit), 15,425 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sndcanteyit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.