Channel
@snezka_049
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,444subscribers
+145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001880420146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @snezka_049 |
| Created | 31 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/snezka_049 |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 7,444 | +29 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 7,415 | +25 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 7,390 | +35 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 7,355 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:09 | 7,358 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 7,362 | +44 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 7,318 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 7,327 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 7,329 | +28 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 7,301 | +11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 7,290 | -14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 7,304 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:40 | 7,303 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 7,299 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (11 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,900 |
| Reactions total | 801 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16,408 reactions across 35 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348252169294329509 | 6,932 | 42.2% | |
| custom 5368689139812152808 | 4,764 | 29.0% | |
| ⚡ | 1,859 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5359452752512570378 | 1,505 | 9.17% | |
| 💊 | 1,348 | 8.22% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snezka_049. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Задумываюсь, что чёт хочется один арт трейдос взять.. Присылайте примеры работ (штук 3-4) и каналы в бота моего @snezdocask_bot Потом освобожусь от комишек, выберу художника :] (вам придётся рисовать Снеждоков сразу скажу💀)
custom 5348252169294329509150custom 536868913981215280843⚡34💊8
🐇Привет у меня др ✌🎉 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Можете пожалуйста сделать репост моих картинок, буду рада оченьб, спасибо!!!💚🫶🏻 Гифтосы ваши в щп репосщу, можете в лс или сюда в коменты кидать 💚 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 💚 @snezka_049 💚 @snezka_049 💚 @snezka_049
custom 5368689139812152808309custom 5348252169294329509161💊78⚡18
😨 Сделала штуку с голосом ос 😨 Во первых да, у неё голос как у Твайлайт, во вторых да, у неё русский акцент, это прикольно🩹 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
custom 5348252169294329509248custom 536868913981215280890💊57⚡24
Posted without readable text
custom 534825216929432950964💊18custom 536868913981215280817⚡15
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 конкурс рисунков с призами 🤩🤩 @INHA009 🤩🤩 @rowanmakesarts 🤩🤩 @Raya_Dragon26 🤩🤩 @lovely05rabbits 🤩🤩 @ali_re_logovodeda 🤩🤩 @arli_q Большое спасибо всем за замечательные работы! Мы рады, что участники смогли проявить себя и продемонстрировали высокий уровень мастерства вместе с замечательным идеями и задумками. Каждая из работ вышла просто невероятной! С вами свяжутся в течение 2 дней для выдачи …
custom 534825216929432950968custom 536868913981215280816💊13⚡7
Попишите чтот в анонку, давно не было. В коментах поотвечаю @snezdocask_bot
custom 5368689139812152808107custom 534825216929432950949⚡39💊9
Тв/кв страшилка вент
custom 5348252169294329509279💊112custom 536868913981215280884⚡17
Do you like hurting other people? 🐓 Выложу 4 фотки моего косплея на Джекета из Hotline Miami, мне нравится 🥰 Ещё несколько фоток в щп тут (я в щп ещё на Мисс Форчун кидала косплей) Я ваще планирую его повторить потом, но улучшить в моментах, с нами как раз сможет быть Байкер 🏍
⚡248custom 534825216929432950995💊66custom 536868913981215280830
Мьь... Я сделала платкууу... Вход 3к на год! 🙏🏻 Такая цена, потому что, там арты⁺¹⁸ которые я ни где не посщу, 1 раз оплатил и смотри скок хочешь, все что будет появляться за год, ещё я не хочу что-бы их сливали, а потом возмущались как так, снешка рисует 🔞 💀 Ноу ноу, я никому не навязываю, это только для тех, кто просил и хотел это видеть. А там уже много картинок. Так что, если хочется видеть больше моего творчеств…
💊238custom 5348252169294329509122custom 536868913981215280886⚡28
Когда мне не хорошо, я рисую птичко Дока по мемным картинкам ворон. Некая терапия 💚🪤🐦⬛
⚡297custom 5368689139812152808137custom 5348252169294329509118💊10
Через неделю др, афигеть
custom 534825216929432950949⚡16custom 536868913981215280812💊5
Винил ◍ артодел ◍ заказы открыты🤩 @VinilRecord @VinilRecord толерашка англфд, тето и ос лавер, гриб(не чайный), ну и там много чего еще
custom 534825216929432950951custom 536868913981215280817⚡12💊7
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @snezka_049. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Скажите чего бы вам побольше хотелось на канале мь
The shares total 184%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐰𝙎𝙉𝙀𝙕𝙆𝘼💉” (@snezka_049), 7,444 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snezka_049.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.