Entire chain hard shilling a meme. If it doesn't rip then they're cooked
💯5🔥3🌚1👏1

Channel
@sniperssden
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,097subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244488068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sniperssden |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sniperssden |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 7,097 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 7,099 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 7,103 | +45 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 7,058 | +31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 7,027 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 7,019 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 7,037 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 7,049 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 7,064 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 7,081 | -23 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 7,104 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 7,114 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 7,122 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 7,123 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 7,123 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
288 reactions across 40 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 75 | 26.0% | |
| 👏 | 67 | 23.3% | |
| 👀 | 29 | 10.1% | |
| 🙏 | 22 | 7.64% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 5.90% | |
| 🌚 | 16 | 5.56% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 4.51% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 3.82% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 2.43% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 1.74% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.74% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 1.39% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.347% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.347% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Entire chain hard shilling a meme. If it doesn't rip then they're cooked
💯5🔥3🌚1👏1
Every degen i bought up until basecat went to fucking zero man. You just gotta keep showing up
👏4🤝2
Fucking hell should have shared this with the den at $130k but i was on a degen losing streak
😢5👏1🤝1
THERE SHE GOES MY BASE CATTTTT.
💔2👏1
I am super optimistic but prepared to be disappointed
💯3👏1
IMO RH got complacent and dropped the ball.
💯3👏1
Rotation from Cashcat to Basecat has begun. Just not sure if this is going to be temporary
🔥4👏1
The den has spoken.
🔥6👏1
Should i do this degen shit more often?
🔥20🙏12👏5🤝4
Basedog already done a 4x since i gave the den.
🔥7👏1
Basecat has to hit $100m+ else we all wasting our time
🔥5👏1
Just didnt imagine they planned to do it with memes. Maybe they saw RH numbers and decided to give memes another shot? Idk man. Who knows
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @sniperssden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Snipers Den” (@sniperssden), 7,097 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sniperssden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.