Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for #снялцепи

Channel

#снялцепи

@snyalcepi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,758subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960093572
TypeChannel
Username@snyalcepi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/snyalcepi

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,5828,7638,672.56 August 2026 — 8,754 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,752 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,733 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,719 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,707 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,673 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,651 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,650 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,597 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,582 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,695 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,763 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,758 subscribers8,7586 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,555–8,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:388,758-5
12 Sept 2026, 03:388,763+68
7 Sept 2026, 14:568,695+113
2 Sept 2026, 19:448,582-15
30 Aug 2026, 11:188,597-53
27 Aug 2026, 11:448,650-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:578,651-22
20 Aug 2026, 04:228,673-34
16 Aug 2026, 19:088,707-12
13 Aug 2026, 07:358,719-14
9 Aug 2026, 23:368,733-19
6 Aug 2026, 21:208,752-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:028,754first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 8,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 November 202526 August 2026)
Views total1,290
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
343
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 22 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
185
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snyalcepi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 November 2025 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Urbanator_storePhoto

URBANATOR ∞ ЛЕТ 🎁 💚 5 сентября отмечаем день рождения URBANATOR. Большая ночь, знакомые имена и любимые треки из твоего плейлиста. Собираемся в Live Stars и отмечаем вместе — до самого утра. ➖LIVE: голодный cardinparis снялцепи лума ➖MC: Никита Гагин 2ghoul ➖DJ: naked yushirr madi lonbi Билет – 600₽. Кешбэк до 150%. условия акции 🔣 БИЛЕТЫ 📅 5 сентября / 22:00 — 05:00 📍 Live Stars. Москва, Берсеневский переул

16 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈3,230 views0 reactions12 Starsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @roymaizPhoto

роймейз, #снялцепи, 3elfharm – FLEXIM prod. tripp cover luvm3 СЛУШАТЬ

26 May 2026, 18:33 UTC≈19,600 views0 reactions42 Starsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @killormissFile

скажи мне что все не вечно кровь размыло мокрыи асфальт ее нет там бессердечно ты покинула наш фестиваль скажи(что) кто ты(я) я он(и) мы ты(а) мои флер(как) дыши (я)цветы (ты)ножи умри в моииииих ру.. (я)цветы (ты)ножи

30 Apr 2026, 22:17 UTC≈17,500 views0 reactions10 Starsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @prodaldushuuPhoto

@продалдушу + #снялцепи - your phone ㅤ ㅤ prod. by me x #снялцепи

27 Feb 2026, 21:14 UTC≈26,600 views0 reactions7 Starsread 28 August 2026

привет друзбя вы как тут

5 Feb 2026, 21:05 UTC≈29,300 views0 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @pri3rakkr0viPhoto

pri3rakkr0v¡, #снялцепи - ненавижу тебя prod. michael harrison LISTEN ON SOUNDCLOUD

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @snyalcepi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Nov 2025, 14:35 UTCAnonymous Poll2,270 voters approx.

надо это выпускат?

  1. надо78%
  2. нууу наверное нет22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“#снялцепи” (@snyalcepi), 8,758 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snyalcepi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.