Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net +73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,679–5,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 23:16
5,763
+2
8 Sept 2026, 11:56
5,761
+12
2 Sept 2026, 21:28
5,749
-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:36
5,753
+3
28 Aug 2026, 04:05
5,750
+10
24 Aug 2026, 19:07
5,740
+12
21 Aug 2026, 01:44
5,728
+25
17 Aug 2026, 15:24
5,703
+2
14 Aug 2026, 11:38
5,701
+3
11 Aug 2026, 02:06
5,698
+8
8 Aug 2026, 08:01
5,690
no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:32
5,690
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,112 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😡
368
33.1%
❤
309
27.8%
🍓
112
10.1%
❤🔥
109
9.80%
💘
86
7.73%
😎
74
6.65%
🎉
26
2.34%
🤗
18
1.62%
💯
8
0.719%
🆒
2
0.18%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На сколько ответили?
Нет, это не пранк на первое апреля.
кстати, за то время, что я писала, вышло около 20 человек
Скоро будет файл который я забыла выложить из которого как раз взяла все описания. Я считаю его очень важным, поскольку в нем раскрываются фундаментальные идеи и черты почти каждого подтипа.
В комьюнити я почти не сижу, но порой читаю чужие разборы и споры. Захотелось напомнить вам о том, что ни один ти…
Последнее
Х скрывает от мира свое чувство неадекватности. Пагубным мотивом снова является страх быть непринятым и, следовательно, нелюбимым. На самом деле он считает, что у него средние способности, чтобы быть адекватными, но он интроецировал идеал большой эффективности, высокой работоспособности и, поскольку он осознает, что не достигает таких высоких уровней, он полностью обесценивает себя и считает себя неспособны…
Такова стратегия х: они активно отрицают свой внутренний опыт, скрывая его за закрытыми дверями, чтобы спрятаться от «жестокой и безобразной» правды. Вместо этого они категорически исповедуют обратное, чтобы избежать всякого подобия «незначительности», в то время как их стремление к страстной любви обещает блаженное возвышение. Они ожидают, что их освободят. Это обычная черта среди х, которые склонны ждать, пока парт…
Истинное единство заключается во взаимном слушании и соединении на эмоциональном уровне. Почему этот персонаж избегает такого искреннего слушания и глубокой эмоциональной связи? Потому что им нужно оградить себя от страха настоящего существования (выражения себя, раскрытия своей истинной природы). Любой подлинный контакт с другими неизбежно приведет их к столкновению с истиной. Самые эффективные и яркие аспекты на са…
Х — это, в конце концов, незащищенный ребенок, замаскированный под угрюмого великана, который эмоционально и поведенчески возбуждается, куда бы он ни пошел, уничтожая любую возможность любить и быть любимым бескорыстно. Его последняя месть принимает беспощадную форму, нападая на самого себя, отказывая себе в любой любви, чтобы не чувствовать себя снова использованным, преданным, исключенным или брошенным; сердце не с…
Он тайно дисквалифицирует другого. Эта дисквалификация с позиции превосходства проистекает из их табу на чувство зависти. Вместо этого другим легко завидовать. Можно сказать, что они возлагают на других ответственность за чувство зависти и пытаются направить ее на себя, получая дополнительное преимущество в виде гордости от получаемого ими восхищения. В парных отношениях они более или менее тонко склонны инфантилизир…
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😡45❤5💘3🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @so1pikicada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 1 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
идзая : бинго ; интерактивы ; опросы @ord0favonius · 44,982 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“So1 is talking” (@so1pikicada), 5,763 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/so1pikicada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
