Channel
@socmediamarketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
403subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001899474294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @socmediamarketing |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/socmediamarketing |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 403 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 401 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 403 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 405 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 403 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 402 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 402 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 48 | 37.8% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 29.9% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 15.7% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.36% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.787% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Каждый сммщик знает: рилсы бренда — всегда слегка русская рулетка. Никогда не угадаешь, когда стрельнет! Но так уж вышло, что у нас вместе с GloraX обычно стреляет, и весьма метко 🎯 Поэтому снова хвастаемся: наш совместный кейс в шорт-листе WOW Awards 2026! 🏆 Гармоничная синергия наших команд уже который год держит нас в 🔝
❤8👍7🔥7🎉3
Posted without readable text
🔥11👏5❤🔥3👍1😁1
На рынке нейросетей все отчетливее определяется обратный тренд — пока маркетологи спорят, заменит ли ИИ SMM-щиков, Ford, IBM и некоторые крупные банки мира начали возвращать сотрудников, которых ранее сократили ради внедрения алгоритмов. Причина, как нетрудно догадаться, простая — ИИ не справляется с нюансами контекста. Буквально об этом же мы активно рассказываем в своих материалах, на встречах с девелоперами и отк…
👍5❤4🔥2
В 2026 году в SMM девелопера главный ресурс — не рендеры, а честность В новой статье на REPA разбираем, почему сейчас важно сфокусироваться не на продаже, а на лояльности и спокойствии потребителя. Вы узнаете: • Почему нужно вывести диалог в приоритетный формат коммуникации • Как вести себя на площадках — официальных и не очень • Почему суть продукта важнее инструментов Материал по ссылке
❤5🔥3👍2
Важный инсайт: несмотря на регулярные вызовы от рынка для маркетологов в недвижимости, прямо сейчас открыто одно важное окно возможностей — в блоке GEO-продвижения шансы на выход в поле широкой видимости равны для всех компаний без исключения. В нашем свежем исследовании можно в этом наглядно убедиться. Мы оцифровали реальность: прогнали 300 реальных промптов через 6 нейросетей и разобрали более 14 000 упоминаний за…
❤7👍4🔥4
Мы привезли с форума «Движение» немало интересных инсайтов. Но сегодня поговорим о том, что стало бесповоротно ясно: репутация девелопера — это не отзывы на агрегаторах и не пресс-релизы. Это нематериальный актив, который напрямую влияет на стоимость и скорость продаж. И охранять его нужно так же системно, как финансовые потоки, работая именно с ним, а не с последствиями, выложенными в сеть в виде роликов. Основате…
🔥7❤4👀1👍1
Блок соцсетей на нашем выступлении в рамках экспертного дня "Точки касания" привлек много внимания (и это с учетом, что выступали мы почти вечером). Немного инсайтов и важных мыслей:
❤3
Главная ошибка девелоперов в 2026 году — продолжать делать контент по правилам 2022-го. Заработало! Подписчик прислал контент одного из выступлений на форуме. ▪️ Люди устали от контента. 65% пользователей уже скрывают рекламные и брендированные публикации даже в привычных соцсетях. Контента стало слишком много, а эмоционального ресурса у людей — слишком мало. ▪️ Классическая контент-матрица больше не работает. …
🔥4👏3
Как же громко мы вчера о себе заявили, ребята! Какой это был драйвовый день! Интереснейшие спикеры, масса сильных кейсов, горячие дискуссии и, конечно, полный зал вас — наших дорогих гостей, которые провели целый день в нашей компании. Очень это ценим, спасибо ❤️ «Точка касания» на «Движении» — это случилось и это было круто👍
🔥10❤7🎉5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @socmediamarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СоцМедиаМаркетинг” (@socmediamarketing), 403 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socmediamarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.