Channel
@socofreligion
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,049subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001604667724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @socofreligion |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/socofreligion |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 2,049 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 2,067 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 2,074 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:27 | 2,069 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 2,072 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 2,076 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 2,073 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 2,072 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 2,073 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 2,072 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
92 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 45.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5415607667496336202 | 11 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.61% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Республике Корея придумали приложение, прокладывающее маршрут через тень, оно набирает большую популярность из-за аномальной жары в стране, газета The Korea Herald. Приложение учитывает положение солнца во время запроса пользователя и рассчитывает, как в этот момент будет падать тень от зданий и деревьев. Также оно расскажет, какая часть пути в процентах будет пролегать в тени.
👍6🤩2🥰1
[Restricted access] Upenieks L., Eagle D. E., Holleman A. Childhood Abuse and the Mental Health of Seminary Students: The Mediating Role of R/S Struggles // Review of Religious Research. 2026. Vol. 68(2). P. 207-230. Было обнаружено, что учащиеся семинарии подвергаются более высокому риску подвергнуться жестокому обращению в детстве по сравнению с населением США в целом, а также демонстрируют проблемы с психическим …
🤔2👍1custom 54156076674963362021
Междисциплинарная научная конференция «Коморбидное поле 3.0: социальное благополучие, здоровье и медицина во множественных контекстах» 🏙️ Центр сравнительных исследований социального благополучия ВШЭ 📆 3-5 декабря 2026 г. 📌 Предлагаемые направления для обсуждения: 1. Медицинская культура: институции, практики, агенты и социальные ресурсы здоровья 2. Репрезентации здоровья, болезни, тела пациентов и качества жизни ме…
❤4🔥2👍1
Коллеги в Санкт-Петербургском университете приглашают на конференцию памяти Марианны Михайловны Шахнович (1957 — 2025) в очном и дистанционном формате. ✔️22 сентября 2026 г. оканчивается регистрация для участников и слушателей, а сама конференция ✔️22-23 октября.
Летняя школа «Современные социальные исследования неравенства» 🏙️ Научно-учебная лаборатория психологии социального неравенства ВШЭ 📆 24-27 августа 2026 г. Цель Летней школы — создать пространство взаимодействия между представителями НКО и профессиональных помогающих организаций, молодыми исследователями и лекторами для решения актуальных исследовательских задач московских некоммерческих организаций. ⏰ 10 августа …
❤5🔥4custom 54156076674963362023
📚📚📚🍵
❤3🥰1custom 54156076674963362021
Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем Вас принять участие в работе Всероссийского круглого стола «Методологические стратегии исследования религиозности» 💡 Центр исламоведческих исследований Академии наук Республики Татарстан 📆 9 октября 2026 г. 🌆 г. Казань Цель круглого стола – создать пространство для аналитического обсуждения существующих методологических подходов и совместными усилиями построить целостную карту их возмож…
👍1
Новая книга: Социология цифровых неравенств: методологические вызовы и эмпирические результаты: [монография] / Н. С. Воронина, Е. Н. Гасюкова, Е. А. Григорьева [и др.]; отв. ред. М. Ф. Черныш, Ю. Б. Епихина; ФНИСЦ РАН. – М. : ФНИСЦ РАН, 2026. – 524 с.
👍3
😁😁😁
👍13😁1
📌Открыт приём заявок на Летнюю школу «Болгарский диалог культур» – 2026 в новом формате! 🌐 С 24 по 28 августа в Болгарской исламской академии пройдёт Летняя школа «Болгарский диалог культур». В этом году проект, реализуемый при поддержке Группы стратегического видения «Россия – Исламский мир», пройдёт в обновлённом формате – как акселератор практических проектных решений в сфере межрелигиозного согласия и диалога ку…
👍1
Sexuality and the Catholic Priesthood: The 'Chaste' Caste (Routledge Studies in the Sociology of Religion) by Marco Marzano Based on interviews with Roman Catholic seminarians, priests and former priests, as well as with managers of seminaries, teaching staff, psychologists and psychiatrists, this book considers the lives of the clergy, beginning with the period before entering the seminary. With attention to both h…
Уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем Вас принять участие в работе Всероссийского круглого стола «Методологические стратегии исследования религиозности» 💡 Центр исламоведческих исследований Академии наук Республики Татарстан 📆 9 октября 2026 г. 🌆 г. Казань Цель круглого стола – создать пространство для аналитического обсуждения существующих методологических подходов и совместными усилиями построить целостную карту их возмож…
👍3❤1custom 54156076674963362021
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @socofreligion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Studia Societatis” (@socofreligion), 2,049 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socofreligion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.