Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jun88 PB2 - SOI KÈO THỂ THAO

Channel

Jun88 PB2 - SOI KÈO THỂ THAO

@soikeothethaojun88

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

84,712subscribers

-5,799 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002619396518
TypeChannel
Username@soikeothethaojun88
DescriptionĐộc quyền chỉ có tại Jun88 - Phiên bản 2 Giao dịch nạp rút qua USDT Bảo Mật - Nhanh Chóng - Tiện Lợi * Hotline: +84 358475688
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/soikeothethaojun88

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

84,71290,51187,611.57 August 2026 — 90,511 subscribers8 August 2026 — 90,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 90,384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 90,343 subscribers11 August 2026 — 89,993 subscribers12 August 2026 — 89,861 subscribers14 August 2026 — 89,804 subscribers15 August 2026 — 89,715 subscribers16 August 2026 — 89,592 subscribers17 August 2026 — 89,383 subscribers18 August 2026 — 89,258 subscribers19 August 2026 — 88,832 subscribers20 August 2026 — 88,738 subscribers22 August 2026 — 88,060 subscribers24 August 2026 — 87,947 subscribers25 August 2026 — 87,819 subscribers26 August 2026 — 87,738 subscribers27 August 2026 — 87,671 subscribers28 August 2026 — 87,610 subscribers29 August 2026 — 87,584 subscribers30 August 2026 — 87,511 subscribers31 August 2026 — 87,424 subscribers1 September 2026 — 87,343 subscribers2 September 2026 — 87,313 subscribers2 September 2026 — 87,228 subscribers4 September 2026 — 87,180 subscribers6 September 2026 — 86,915 subscribers10 September 2026 — 86,689 subscribers12 September 2026 — 86,598 subscribers13 September 2026 — 86,500 subscribers15 September 2026 — 86,446 subscribers17 September 2026 — 86,370 subscribers27 September 2026 — 86,001 subscribers4 October 2026 — 85,807 subscribers9 October 2026 — 85,704 subscribers13 October 2026 — 85,606 subscribers14 October 2026 — 85,565 subscribers15 October 2026 — 85,523 subscribers16 October 2026 — 85,498 subscribers17 October 2026 — 85,471 subscribers18 October 2026 — 85,451 subscribers19 October 2026 — 85,430 subscribers21 October 2026 — 85,396 subscribers22 October 2026 — 85,225 subscribers23 October 2026 — 85,191 subscribers24 October 2026 — 85,166 subscribers25 October 2026 — 85,138 subscribers26 October 2026 — 85,104 subscribers27 October 2026 — 85,085 subscribers28 October 2026 — 85,062 subscribers29 October 2026 — 85,035 subscribers30 October 2026 — 85,007 subscribers31 October 2026 — 84,974 subscribers1 November 2026 — 84,916 subscribers2 November 2026 — 84,893 subscribers3 November 2026 — 84,852 subscribers4 November 2026 — 84,788 subscribers4 November 2026 — 84,712 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -5,799. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,842–91,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 23:1684,712-76
4 Nov 2026, 02:1184,788-64
3 Nov 2026, 00:1984,852-41
2 Nov 2026, 00:2784,893-23
1 Nov 2026, 03:5984,916-58
31 Oct 2026, 03:1684,974-33
30 Oct 2026, 04:4685,007-28
29 Oct 2026, 07:0685,035-27
28 Oct 2026, 07:0585,062-23
27 Oct 2026, 10:1685,085-19
26 Oct 2026, 12:5685,104-34
25 Oct 2026, 16:3085,138-28
24 Oct 2026, 15:2185,166-25
23 Oct 2026, 13:3585,191-34
22 Oct 2026, 10:2185,225-171
21 Oct 2026, 01:2085,396-34
19 Oct 2026, 20:1885,430-21
18 Oct 2026, 22:2885,451-20
17 Oct 2026, 23:4185,471-27
16 Oct 2026, 20:1985,498first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.38%
avg views ÷ 84,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
322
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held102 (21 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,687
Reactions total591
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈331
Videos
≈1,110
Links
≈1,390

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 27s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,883 reactions across 101 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤73138.8%
🥰1668.82%
🔥1377.28%
🎉1236.53%
👏1115.89%
👍1105.84%
💯965.10%
❤‍🔥955.05%
🤩522.76%
🍾492.60%
🏆402.12%
😁371.96%
😍321.70%
👌271.43%
🍓140.743%
🤔140.743%
😘90.478%
💋70.372%
🤣70.372%
✍30.159%
12 further kinds231.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,883 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC96 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤3❤‍🔥2🥰2

4 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC179 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤7🎉6👏4🤩2😍2❤‍🔥1💯1

3 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC245 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤6👌5🤩5🍓1🍾1🎉1🏆1💯1

2 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC279 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

💯3🥰3😍2❤1❤‍🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC289 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤6🥰5🎉4❤‍🔥1🍓1🍾1🏆1💯1

1 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC259 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤6👏5🔥4👌1🤩1

31 Oct 2026, 08:03 UTC285 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞𝐚 🆚 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 ⏰ 𝟏𝟗𝐡𝟑𝟎 | 𝟑𝟏/𝟏𝟎 ⚽️ Chelsea sở hữu lợi thế sân nhà cùng hàng công có phong độ ấn tượng, ghi 17 bàn trong 5 trận sân nhà gần nhất. Tuy nhiên, hàng phòng ngự vẫn còn nhiều sơ hở và việc thiếu vắng một số trụ cột có thể khiến The Blues gặp khó khăn. Dù vậy, Chelsea vẫn có cơ sở để hướng đến 3 điểm. ⚽️ MU đan…

❤9👏5🔥4❤‍🔥1🍓1💯1🥰1😁1

28 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC346 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐚𝐨 𝐂𝐮𝐩 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐥 🆚 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 ⏰ 𝟎𝟑:𝟎𝟎 | 𝐍𝐠à𝐲 𝟐𝟗/𝟏𝟎 ⚽️ Liverpool bước vào trận đại chiến với Chelsea sau chiến thắng 2-0 trước Brighton, cùng lợi thế sân nhà Anfield. Lối chơi pressing tốc độ và khả năng tấn công biên là điểm mạnh của The Reds, nhưng chấn thương và lịch thi đấu dày đặc có thể ảnh hưởng đến lực lượng. ⚽️ Chelsea h…

❤8😍4🔥3🍾2❤‍🔥1🍓1🎉1💯1

26 Oct 2026, 10:05 UTC364 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 𝐋𝐢𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝟏 𝐏𝐒𝐆 🆚 𝐋𝐲𝐨𝐧 ⏰ 𝟎𝟐𝐡𝟑𝟎 | 𝐍𝐠à𝐲 𝟐𝟕/𝟏𝟎 ⚽️ PSG đang lấy lại phong độ ấn tượng, thắng liên tiếp 7 trận trên mọi đấu trường, áp sát ngôi đầu Ligue 1 và dẫn đầu Champions League. Đặc biệt, hai chiến thắng 4-2 trước Man City và Barcelona cho thấy sức mạnh cùng tham vọng bảo vệ danh hiệu của thầy trò HLV Luis Enrique. ⚽️ …

❤7🔥5🥰5💯2❤‍🔥1🍓1🎉1🤩1

25 Oct 2026, 09:03 UTC378 views25 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐥 🆚 𝐁𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐨𝐧 ⏰ 𝟐𝟏𝐡𝟎𝟎 | 𝐍𝐠à𝐲 𝟐𝟓/𝟏𝟎 ⚽️ Liverpool đang dần lấy lại phong độ với 3 chiến thắng liên tiếp, ghi 12 bàn trên mọi đấu trường. Florian Wirtz nổi bật với khả năng kiến tạo, trong khi Alexander Isak cho thấy hiệu suất ghi bàn ấn tượng. Tuy nhiên, hàng thủ The Kop vẫn chưa thực sự chắc chắn khi để thủng lư…

🔥5❤4🥰4🎉3🤔2😘2👏1💋1

24 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC377 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐫 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞𝐚 🆚 𝐓𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐦 𝐇𝐨𝐭𝐬𝐩𝐮𝐫 ⏰ 𝟐𝟑:𝟑𝟎 | 𝐍𝐠à𝐲 𝟐𝟒/𝟏𝟎/𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 ⚽️ Chelsea đang đứng thứ 4 với 13 điểm sau 7 vòng đấu. Đội bóng vừa giành chiến thắng 2-0 trước Everton, tạo đà tâm lý thuận lợi trước trận derby. Mục tiêu của The Blues là tận dụng lợi thế Stamford Bridge để tiếp tục bám đuổi nhóm dẫn đầu. ⚽️ Tottenham đang xếp thứ 16 với 6 điểm…

❤9🥰4💯3😍2

22 Oct 2026, 09:04 UTC405 views25 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️⚽️ 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 Europa League 𝐁𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐡 🆚 𝐀𝐂 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐧 ⏰ 𝟎𝟐𝐡𝟎𝟎 | 𝐍𝐠à𝐲 𝟐𝟑/𝟏𝟎 ⚽️ Bournemouth đang tạo dấu ấn mạnh mẽ trong lần đầu tham dự đấu trường cúp châu Âu với hai chiến thắng liên tiếp trước Sociedad (2-1) và Sturm Graz (3-0), vươn lên vị trí thứ 5 trên bảng xếp hạng. Dưới sự dẫn dắt của HLV Marco Rose, The Cherries gây ấn tượng với lối chơi pressin…

❤8🥰6🎉5❤‍🔥1🍾1👏1💯1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @soikeothethaojun88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@soikeothethaojun88 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @soikeothethaojun88 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jun88 PB2 - SOI KÈO THỂ THAO” (@soikeothethaojun88), 84,712 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soikeothethaojun88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.