Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бабки не проблема

Channel

Бабки не проблема

@solo322

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

45,295subscribers

+624 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002615035535
TypeChannel
Username@solo322
DescriptionПарни, что мы наставили?) Основа: @solo_q_q Сотрудничество: @JiraiyaRice
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/solo322

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,30446,77042,5376 August 2026 — 44,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 44,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 44,600 subscribers9 August 2026 — 44,580 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,562 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,655 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,637 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,277 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,949 subscribers16 August 2026 — 43,472 subscribers17 August 2026 — 43,483 subscribers18 August 2026 — 43,476 subscribers19 August 2026 — 43,464 subscribers20 August 2026 — 43,674 subscribers21 August 2026 — 44,104 subscribers23 August 2026 — 45,019 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,074 subscribers25 August 2026 — 45,790 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,609 subscribers27 August 2026 — 45,475 subscribers28 August 2026 — 45,413 subscribers29 August 2026 — 45,034 subscribers30 August 2026 — 44,930 subscribers31 August 2026 — 44,777 subscribers1 September 2026 — 44,605 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,682 subscribers3 September 2026 — 42,532 subscribers6 September 2026 — 42,340 subscribers9 September 2026 — 42,089 subscribers11 September 2026 — 41,930 subscribers13 September 2026 — 41,793 subscribers15 September 2026 — 41,724 subscribers17 September 2026 — 41,670 subscribers25 September 2026 — 41,101 subscribers3 October 2026 — 38,304 subscribers8 October 2026 — 38,875 subscribers12 October 2026 — 41,303 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,258 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,882 subscribers16 October 2026 — 43,399 subscribers17 October 2026 — 44,100 subscribers18 October 2026 — 46,770 subscribers19 October 2026 — 45,545 subscribers20 October 2026 — 45,427 subscribers21 October 2026 — 45,295 subscribers45,2956 August 202621 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 76 days, net +624. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,034–48,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 21:4845,295-132
20 Oct 2026, 17:2845,427-118
19 Oct 2026, 15:4045,545-1,225
18 Oct 2026, 12:0546,770+2,670
17 Oct 2026, 14:5744,100+701
16 Oct 2026, 13:2843,399+517
15 Oct 2026, 13:2242,882+624
14 Oct 2026, 11:1642,258+955
12 Oct 2026, 19:0841,303+2,428
8 Oct 2026, 06:5638,875+571
3 Oct 2026, 18:5638,304-2,797
25 Sept 2026, 00:0241,101-569
17 Sept 2026, 05:1941,670-54
15 Sept 2026, 07:0041,724-69
13 Sept 2026, 17:3741,793-137
11 Sept 2026, 23:4141,930-159
9 Sept 2026, 16:5642,089-251
6 Sept 2026, 07:5742,340-192
3 Sept 2026, 23:3742,532-150
2 Sept 2026, 16:2942,682first reading

Engagement

707 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 45,295 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,920
311 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.306%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
311
of 707 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 280 of 311 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held707 (2 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total1,840,632
Reactions total5,167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 00:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈316
Links
≈1,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
47m 03s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 86 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,586 reactions across 661 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53842923479766405924,50728.9%
custom 53955748576960509444,02325.8%
custom 53840800906928734932,82018.1%
custom 53752968739826049631,3338.55%
custom 52584036267154790051,0937.01%
custom 53167133912161593158925.72%
custom 51931557806347762453222.07%
custom 54698913124739095352411.55%
custom 53842752840715757842271.46%
custom 5467456452564134216860.552%
custom 5192884424601013486420.269%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 663 of the 707 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,586 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 707 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 706 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solo322. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 707 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
24.2%
171 of 707 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
171
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,460
over 171 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,630
over 535 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
KW2aPRYdr5QoPXHUdtobk8svGfxAJ8yZPyEBhs3uTbQW8gQT9DXB6CaoCdcj9UtV12220 August 202611 October 2026
KW2aPRYdr5QoPXHUHdcgTCt4YvVMXRbzXgm5jt2GVqmW9XeS5o1yNCX7TEKTsATf492 August 202616 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 707 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,850 views26 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 538408009069287349320custom 53842752840715757844custom 53752968739826049632

21 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC≈4,420 views13 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

😍😍😍😁😁😁😍😍😍 Долгожданные итоги конкурса экспрессов!!! Фрибет на 😍 5000 получает @zzudff за свой экспресс с коэффициентом 96.55 ❤️ 😍 3000 уходят Тимуру — коэффициент 82.8 (напиши админу) 😎 И по 😍 1000 фрибетов отправляются: @Baltica9ka 13.07 @satanh0me 10.99 @Hluinskins 8 @iamdjon 7.65 @mskmskmskmsk12 7.59 @Dnevnicktwitcha 5.38 @AwwentTop 5.21 @andryushchitsa 5.08 Фрибеты выдаст @misterfefov. Если заметили ошибку т…

custom 53955748576960509448custom 53842923479766405923custom 53840800906928734932

21 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈4,990 views8 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video

Помоги Художнику Покера на BETBOOM Медиа Покере ♦️ Друзья из BETBOOM вновь запустили акцию «Большой Куш»: 1. Заходи на сайт или в приложение 2. Выбирай меня фаворитом 3. Делай ставки от 1 000 ₽ с общим кэфом не менее 1.10 4. Поднимаемся в топы ладдера 5. Делим на всех 1 000 000 фрибетов В прошлом сезоне благодаря вам я оказался за финальным столом. Делаем второй раз подряд? 😎

custom 52584036267154790053custom 54698913124739095353custom 53752968739826049632

20 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC≈6,260 views19 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Кого из андердогов хотели бы видеть на мажоре? 😎

custom 539557485769605094411custom 53167133912161593154custom 53842923479766405924

20 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC≈6,400 views23 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Видели какая заруба идёт за слот на мажор в Сингапуре? 😁 Из интересного Нави рисковали вообще не попасть на мажор, но сейчас, судя по ХЛТВ, попадают с вероятностью 97%… но во 2 stage Кому интересно, вот ссылка на хлтв

custom 539557485769605094412custom 53840800906928734936custom 53167133912161593155

19 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC≈5,340 views10 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Кооперативный GAMBLE with FRIENDS 😁😁😁 📺 YouTube нарезка 🌟 Boosty без цензуры

custom 53955748576960509446custom 53167133912161593153custom 53842923479766405921

18 Oct 2026, 15:14 UTC≈8,220 views14 reactionsread 22 October 2026

🎉 Розыгрыш завершен! 🏆 Победители: 1. @ksanacss_offycall 2. @savakii7372737 3. @lxttikk 4. @alish_uzb 5. @wwerta5 6. @fomkaplay 7. @l4221626 8. @CUBEQWRRTY 9. @a6gented41 10. @grobic20wh1 11. @No_tg_yesno5 12. @myshaoq 13. @Bubulgum57 14. @shaynikz 15. @whyoustopnow 16. @Lowtab57 17. @posiaG 18. @yuungrown 19. @youngbinson 20. @Xsper7a 🔍 Проверить результаты С победителями свяжется @KM_Des1gn

custom 538408009069287349314

18 Oct 2026, 08:48 UTC≈8,570 views31 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Тем временем ББ прошли в гранд-финал Thunderpick, тир-1 турик между прочим 😎 Думаете есть шансы против бразильцев?

custom 538429234797664059225custom 53167133912161593153custom 53955748576960509443

16 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈10,300 views11 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 538429234797664059211

16 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈9,930 views31 reactionsread 22 October 2026

А, не… 3:13 🙅‍♂️

custom 538429234797664059220custom 53955748576960509447custom 53167133912161593154

16 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC≈9,580 views18 reactionsread 22 October 2026

2:12 — время для истории! 😎

custom 538429234797664059212custom 53167133912161593154custom 53752968739826049632

16 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC≈9,090 views24 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Video

ЛЁХА СИЯЕТ! КАК ЖЕ ЭТО БЫЛО БЛИЗКО... 😭 😍 Фрибет до 10 000 новым клиентам по промокоду BSB

custom 531671339121615931516custom 51931557806347762455custom 53842923479766405923

Showing the 12 most recent of 707 posts we hold for @solo322. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@solo322 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,000 voters approx.

Как вам патч, в целом? 😁

  1. Пойдет12%
  2. Заебали буквенные патчи 😢68%
  3. Подрубай уже стрим 😁33%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTCAnonymous Poll1,980 voters approx.

Делаем лесенку с 1000 рублей? 😁

  1. Погнали46%
  2. Да55%
  3. 🐢🐢🐢24%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTCAnonymous Poll2,050 voters approx.

Виталити вернут свой прайм? 🇪🇺

  1. Да, обязательно, когда будут играть без замен14%
  2. Эра уже закончилась, такого больше не будет60%
  3. 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩25%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTCAnonymous Poll99 voters

Уже проснулся и топишь за драконов? 🇷🇺

  1. С самого начала 🫡72%
  2. Еще сплю(стало быть никто не нажмет)23%
  3. Еду на ББ БАЗУ11%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTCAnonymous Poll914 voters

Так, что думаете по второй карте?

  1. 1:1, Нигма могут 🤑60%
  2. 2:0 и оффаем стрим ⭐️41%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 707 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бабки не проблема” (@solo322), 45,295 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solo322.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.