Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 561–579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 00:39
573
+4
7 Sept 2026, 06:01
569
-8
30 Aug 2026, 03:57
577
+7
22 Aug 2026, 15:13
570
+7
7 Aug 2026, 22:32
563
-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:47
564
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:33
564
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 1 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
202 reactions across 6 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
17.8%
custom 5197608630928579888
26
12.9%
custom 5460723034765683504
22
10.9%
custom 5447442282921869664
16
7.92%
custom 5197572531728440480
14
6.93%
custom 5447518900843460911
13
6.44%
custom 5413518204561536931
12
5.94%
custom 5411280595319798648
11
5.45%
custom 5276030039354282970
9
4.46%
custom 5335051436986233180
7
3.47%
💋
7
3.47%
custom 5458585116009855086
4
1.98%
custom 5280648241594001355
3
1.49%
custom 5280863724398210738
3
1.49%
custom 5335065872371314508
3
1.49%
custom 5255956624933163860
2
0.99%
custom 5271596516413303181
2
0.99%
custom 5280574230717560954
2
0.99%
custom 5404838264634901466
2
0.99%
custom 5413804236498548047
2
0.99%
3 further kinds
6
2.97%
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 6 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @solyankamakeup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 May 2026 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Решила собрать все необходимые ссылочки в одном посте, на случай если кому-то будет интересно ✨
🤣Доп ссылочка: МОЙ ВИШЛИСТ
📲📲📲📲📲📲⬆️
😎МОЙ БЬЮТИ ИНСТ
😎МОЙ ЛАЙФ ИНСТ
😎МОЙ ТИКТОК С МАКИЯЖАМИ
😎МОЙ НОВЫЙ/СТАРЫЙ ТИКТОК ТОЖЕ БЬЮТИ
(П.с это мой самый древний акк я решила его оживить и основной бьюти контент будет там)
😎МОЙ ЮТУБ
😎МОЙ ТГК
😎СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО: @solyanka202
📲📲📲📲📲📲📲 📲📲⬆️(здесь ссылочки на …
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩📲📲📲📲📲📲
Вот такая красота у меня появилась от ALCHIMICA
🌟🌟
🌟🌟 Я выбрала 3 аромата, давай подробнее про каждый:
🤩🤩 FLÖR GARDEN
Верх: свежая трава, питахайя, личи
Вкус: гальбанум, жасмин, гибискус, озон
База: роза, мускус, ваниль
🤩
Ребята, я флорист (в прошлом) с уверенностью могу сказать, что этот аромат в точности переедает запах из цветочного магазина. Этот парфюм мой фаворит.
🤩🤩
🤩🤩RETURNING …
🤩🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱
Показываю вам видосик с нашей коллабы
Мой образ-Селина 🤩
Добавила змей, поскольку они напрямую связаны с Селиной
Не забываем про реакции! ❤️
Этот образ в тиктоке тупо не пропускает и банит🙄
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🤩🤩The darkness will consume you
🌟 Айси
— лидер Трикс, самая холодная и властная. Обладает магией льда, не прощает слабости и стремится к власти любой ценой.
🌟 Сторми
— ведьма из Трикс. Самая эмоциональная и вспыльчивая, управляет погодой и грозами. Не скрывает своих чувств и всегда готова к битве.
🌟 Дарси
— ведьма из Трикс. Хитрая, рассудительная и мастер иллюзий. Часто действует расчётливо, но всегда…
🤩🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🤩
Потестировала я новую палетку от BEAUTY BOMB, и осталась довольна! Да, цена на нее слишком кусачая, но я думаю, на скидках можно урвать выгодно. Если такая возможность есть-берите, палетка хорошая!
Оттенки нежные, бархатные, тушуются между собой легко! А оформление палетки-окунуло в детство…
Сделала макияж, и не хотела его смывать!
Есть у вас уже эта палетка?
#туториал
❤️🤩🌟⭐️❤️
Сейчас активно вливаюсь в рабочую атмосферу, и постепенно готовлюсь к возвращению в личный блог. Надеюсь, что та мотивация, которую я сейчас имею, не угаснет.
В целом много чего могу и хочу показать, обустраиваю себе комфортный ритм жизни, чтобы снова не слететь с катушек
Всех люблю, спасибо, что хотя бы кто-то остается со мной 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @solyankamakeup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💋𝐁𝐄𝐀𝐔𝐓𝐘 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐘𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐀💋” (@solyankamakeup), 573 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solyankamakeup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.