Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,469–5,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:21
5,476
-8
14 Sept 2026, 10:16
5,484
-4
11 Sept 2026, 05:18
5,488
-4
6 Sept 2026, 10:40
5,492
-1
2 Sept 2026, 08:17
5,493
-3
29 Aug 2026, 23:15
5,496
-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:13
5,498
-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:33
5,501
-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:23
5,506
-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:53
5,509
-6
13 Aug 2026, 13:27
5,515
-7
10 Aug 2026, 23:23
5,522
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:12
5,523
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:15
5,525
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
305 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
126
41.3%
🔥
69
22.6%
❤🔥
32
10.5%
😍
20
6.56%
👍
18
5.90%
🤩
8
2.62%
🥰
8
2.62%
custom 5303063010191889637
7
2.30%
🤗
7
2.30%
🏆
5
1.64%
💘
5
1.64%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @somedaymedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 March 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
6.67%
1 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
471
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
898
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqvwuhai
1
21 July 2026
21 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 21 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пока наши коллеги проводят отпуск на морском берегу, команда маркетинга ИКРЫ вовсю готовится в горы.
В этом году на Global Event Forum выступит основатель ИКРЫ Василий Лебедев. Поговорим о влиянии ИИ на стратегические сессии и поделимся, почему личный опыт руководителей, незаписанный контекст, доверие и административные договорённости невозможно просто скормить нейронкам. Выступление поможет понять, какие задачи в с…
В конце прошлого года мы сидели с командой и думали — а классно, если идеи буквально будут записывать на салфетках! Масштабировать это до спецпроекта, найти единомышленников, которые готовы будут с нами вписаться в такую приятную авантюру.
Буквально через две недели нас судьба свела с легендарной сетью мест для еды, общения и вдохновения буше из Петербурга — и мы слёту договорились о спецпроекте.
Так мы решили дать…
На выходных завершилась ещё одна история нашего тёплого и воодушевляющего партнёрства: второй поток курса «ИИ для бизнеса» для Технограда — проекта Правительства Москвы, где каждый может приобрести практические знания и освоить прикладные навыки, востребованные в бизнесе.
Проект длился 2,5 месяца, за это время наша команда обучала предпринимателей и руководителей, как применять искусственный интеллект в бизнес-проце…
Мы стали получать от вас обратную связь по новой программе «Стратегическое лидерство»: вы просили дать возможность зайти в курс не сразу на все 152 учебных часа, а попасть на отдельный модуль.
Делаем! Вы можете пойти на первый модуль «Управление стратегией и внедрение изменений» по специальной цене 120 000 рублей до 16 июня. Оформить такой доступ можно только через нашего менеджера, она и активирует это предложение …
Слушайте, а давайте с вами обсудим, как стратегически развивать команду через ревью и обратную связь? Как будто сейчас тема горящая и актуальная: ведь надо оценить работу команды в конце квартала и за полугодие, сохранять HiPo-сотрудников, а кому-то приходится принимать не самые популярные решения.
Встречаемся на короткой онлайн-лекции. Вести её будет Александра Нефедова, эксперт в корпоративном обучении, руководит …
Мы всегда были убеждены, что главный секрет успешного пиар-сотрудничества — в людях.
Если вы понимаете, слышите друг друга, если ваши идеи гармонируют с ДНК брендов, то любой совместный проект по умолчанию выйдет качественным — так у нас и случилось с hh.ru
Много лет основатель ИКРЫ Василий Лебедев является членом жюри в премии HR-бренд года. Каждый год наша команда вдохновляется его историями и наблюдениями с засе…
Мы пробуем новый формат на курсе «Стратегическое лидерство».
В каждый модуль добавили онлайн-занятия, куда руководители должны прийти вместе со своей командой. С теми, с кем вы каждый день встречаетесь на встречах, в переговорках, в онлайн-документах и на обеде. Это мы задумали для того, чтобы вы могли поработать над реальными задачами отдела и вместе со своими коллегами начать путь трансформаций.
Для компаний тако…
Представляете, если бы кто-то идеально спланировал ваше обучение как руководителя? Сколько раз вы уже, наверняка, откладывали эту задачу. Ведь надо описать, какие навыки хочется прокачать, какие темы нужно точно включить, подобрать формат и преподавателя. А может вообще взять ментора и всё? И каждый раз находились более срочные дела.
Так вот мы всё для вас придумали!
Провели исследование среди наших b2b-клиентов и …
Посмотрите, что ещё мы упустили из задач, которые падают на руководителя?
· Управлять в постоянной неопределённости.
· Показывать результат сейчас, но при этом инвестировать в будущее.
· Собирать команду вокруг стратегии, а не только задач.
· Перевести ИИ из экспериментов в бизнес-результат.
· Понять, какие задачи отдавать ИИ, а какие оставлять людям.
· Справляться с падением вовлечённости сотрудников.
· Поддерживат…
Когда две компании решают создать совместный бизнес или запустить крупный партнёрский проект, за столом переговоров обычно оказываются юристы, финансисты и топ-менеджеры. Они договариваются о долях, распределении прибыли, интеллектуальной собственности. И почти никогда не договариваются о том, как людям из двух разных корпоративных миров работать вместе каждый день.
А потом начинается «медовый месяц». И после него —…
Если бы наша работа была экспедицией мореплавателей, мы бы каждый день открывали новые земли.
Много лет говорим про то, какие уникальные и удивительные идеи рождаются в синтезе креативных методов, а теперь к ним добавился ещё и искусственный интеллект. Комбинация разных типов мышлений даёт очень классные результаты, которыми мы не всегда успеваем делиться в текстах.
Тем не менее, мы продолжаем следовать традиции и …
17 лет мы проводим стратегические сессии для среднего и крупного бизнеса в России и за рубежом. За это время мы не раз видели, как стратегия ложится на полку, и точно знаем, что нужно, чтобы она работала, а не пылилась.
Весь этот опыт мы переложили в программу «Стратегическое лидерство», которая продлится 4 месяца в гибридном формате. Этот курс необходим не только руководителям, столкнувшимся с ИИ-оркестрацией и чёр…
🔥15❤10😍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @somedaymedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
mads media @mads_courses · 26,050 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Нетология @netology_ru · 27,487 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вопрос вне контекста | ИКРА” (@somedaymedia), 5,476 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/somedaymedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.