Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for сомни

Channel

сомни

@somnwi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

128subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003889353069
TypeChannel
Username@somnwi
Created17 February 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/somnwi

Growth

841301079 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers10 August 2026 — 87 subscribers18 August 2026 — 123 subscribers25 August 2026 — 130 subscribers31 August 2026 — 128 subscribers1289 August 202631 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 22:37128-2
25 Aug 2026, 14:03130+7
18 Aug 2026, 00:22123+36
10 Aug 2026, 05:1087+3
9 Aug 2026, 17:3084no change
9 Aug 2026, 13:0284first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54158641844181003523319.1%
custom 52782278299542179822212.7%
custom 53910968818435586972212.7%
custom 53866932218102059142112.1%
custom 5415724993117985100169.25%
custom 5195045231237564857126.94%
custom 5310111493906260210126.94%
custom 523568392402950914895.20%
custom 523116416244020678484.62%
custom 521564234820095681474.05%
custom 528093676461204505852.89%
custom 525351491025557973142.31%
custom 521750064740595094510.578%
custom 542729056695198654610.578%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @somnwi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 February 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC59 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ота смотрю все

custom 538669322181020591417custom 52311641624402067845custom 53910968818435586972custom 52535149102555797311

8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC66 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 539109688184355869718custom 53866932218102059144custom 52311641624402067843custom 52535149102555797313

6 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC72 views38 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

привет СПАСИЮО ЗА ЗВЕЗДЫ

custom 541586418441810035223custom 52156423482009568147custom 52809367646120450585custom 53910968818435586972custom 54272905669519865461

18 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC137 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🔳

custom 541572499311798510016custom 519504523123756485712custom 54158641844181003526custom 52175006474059509451

28 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC269 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

:

custom 527822782995421798222custom 531011149390626021012custom 52356839240295091489

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @somnwi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сомни” (@somnwi), 128 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/somnwi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.