Channel
@sonyahtat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
903subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521325828 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sonyahtat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sonyahtat |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 903 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 887 | +13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 874 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 864 | +20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 844 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 844 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 838 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
101 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 40.6% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 9.90% | |
| custom 5208657554556606901 | 9 | 8.91% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 8.91% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 6.93% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5208758516352832570 | 5 | 4.95% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 4.95% | |
| custom 5208802977854282711 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приехали с Никитой за город. Надеюсь завтра удастся покататься на сапах 🏄🏻♀️ — Ржу с комментов из инсты под видео, как я рисую контур 😁
custom 52087585163528325702😍1custom 52086575545566069011
Это полная раскайфовка! Пак почти готов 😊 Вот это я понимаю, попёрло, так попёрло 😆 Осталось подписи добавить ещё. Хочется что-то «наше», но при этом, чтобы подходило для всех переписок. — Накидайте ваши варианты фраз, которые подойдут под такие стикеры 😏
🥰4custom 52088029778542827112
Поделюсь с вами моей записью рисования контура в реальном времени 😌 Там вы сможете заметить, что я стараюсь минимально исправлять и рисовать с первого раза. Можно сказать, что рука набита. От части это так, но не совсем. Я с самого начала не любила по долгу сидеть над рисованием и, если раньше этот этап, по неопытности, мог занимать минут 15, то сейчас 2-5 минут и готовченко! Кстати, это мой любимый этап в рисовани…
custom 52087585163528325703
— Помогайте, какой цвет плащика лучше смотрится?) Либо может вобще какой-нибудь другой взять цвет? 🤔
🥰2custom 52086575545566069011
— Добавила к реакциям три разных Грогу ❤️ 🥳😘 Недавно смотрела фильм «Мандалорец», где у Грогу была отдельная сцена. До чего милый малыш!
custom 52086575545566069017custom 52088029778542827111
Мои дорогие коллеги по творчеству, вижу, что мою кисть для лайна очень выделяют 😌 вопросы поступают каждую неделю. Её можно приобрести тут 🥰
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6
На мой взгляд продажи — это не только про идеальное портфолио. Недавно я поймала себя на одной мысли: мне кажется, многие считают, что клиенты приходят из-за красивого профиля, идеальной упаковки или огромного портфолио. Безусловно это важно. Но всё чаще я замечаю другое 👇🏼 Клиенты остаются там, где чувствуют, что их слышат. Буквально вчера после моих сторис со стикерами Хосушки потенциальный заказчик спросил ме…
💯6
Video message, posted without a caption
🤩6🍓2🍾1🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
🍾4🍓3❤1🤩1
Последние несколько месяцев я жила в постоянном ожидании. Ждала утра, когда снова захочется рисовать и идей, от которых загорятся глаза. Но чем дольше ждала, тем дальше это ощущение ускользало от меня. Недавно я поймала себя на мысли, что, возможно, проблема была не в отсутствии вдохновения, а в том, что я всё время пыталась превзойти себя же. Создать большой курс, каких у меня ещё не было. Супер продуктивно и инт…
❤15
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sonyahtat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sonyahtat | мультяшный мир 🪴” (@sonyahtat), 903 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sonyahtat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.