Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒂 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒈... ִֶָ🪽་ִֶָ༘

Channel

𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒂 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒈... ִֶָ🪽་ִֶָ༘

@sorauo1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003006648846
TypeChannel
Username@sorauo1
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sorauo1

Growth

9410197.59 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 98 subscribers17 August 2026 — 95 subscribers25 August 2026 — 94 subscribers31 August 2026 — 96 subscribers10 September 2026 — 101 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 33 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 15:55101+5
31 Aug 2026, 19:3996+2
25 Aug 2026, 03:3794-1
17 Aug 2026, 09:5495-3
9 Aug 2026, 12:5198-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:0299no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:0099first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘3739.4%
custom 52424539048845372712122.3%
custom 51975326271873087312021.3%
🕊1516.0%
👀11.06%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ВАЖЛИВЕ ПОВІДОМЛЕННЯ ДЛЯ ВЗ/МʼЮ ‼️ ——————————————————————————— 🩷 :: хочу повідомити, що розриваю деякі вз/мʼю, чиї канали мене не цікавлять, або не співставляються з моїми інтересами/важко активити. не беріть близько до серця, бо кожен канал унікальний і ви обовʼязково знайдете свою аудиторію <3 таким чином я також роблю чистку телеграму. дякую за увагу !! якщо будете писати причина відписки - присилаю цей пост. зали

💘2

5 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ILLITuaPhoto

#thread : physical and mental health ILLIT #illit #ot5 ? . ➤ @ILLITua

💘1

5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💘1custom 52424539048845372711

5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC97 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

₊˚⊹ ᰔ NEW INTERACTIVE !! ───────۶ৎ──────── 🩷 :: сьогодні я підготувала для вас невеличке б1нго, з темою "наскільки ви схожі на мене?" тож буду очікувати на ваші результати у к0ментарях <3 ✦•┈๑⋅⋯ ⋯⋅๑┈•✦ (˵◝ ⩊ ◜˵マ #репост #sillysora 🩰🩰

💘2

4 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTCviews —5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52424539048845372714👀1

3 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓻𝓮𝓮... 🤩

  1. 𝓼𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰47%
  2. 1-800-𝓱𝓸𝓽-𝓷-𝓯𝓾𝓷53%
  3. 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓰 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓰47%
  4. 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓽𝓸40%
  5. 𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓶67%
  6. 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓬𝓾𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝔂𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓮47%

The shares total 301%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💘2custom 51975326271873087311

2 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC123 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

₊˚⊹ ᰔ дякую вам за чудовий анон-тайм! 🩰🩰 ──────────────── 🩷 :: у мене справді давно не було такого великого активу, дуже дякую вам, і до нових зустрічей <3 ──────────────── the m1ni-level is complete...

🕊4💘3custom 51975326271873087311custom 52424539048845372711

2 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC128 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒏-𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆? 🌈

  1. 𝟏𝟒:𝟎𝟎59%
  2. 𝟏𝟓:𝟎𝟎41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52424539048845372713💘2custom 51975326271873087311

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sorauo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTCFinal Results15 voters

𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓻𝓮𝓮... 🤩

  1. 𝓼𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓷𝓰47%
  2. 1-800-𝓱𝓸𝓽-𝓷-𝓯𝓾𝓷53%
  3. 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓰 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓰47%
  4. 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓽𝓸40%
  5. 𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓶67%
  6. 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓬𝓾𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝔂𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓮47%

The shares total 301%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTCFinal Results27 voters

𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒏-𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆? 🌈

  1. 𝟏𝟒:𝟎𝟎59%
  2. 𝟏𝟓:𝟎𝟎41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒂 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒈... ִֶָ🪽་ִֶָ༘” (@sorauo1), 101 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorauo1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.