Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сорокин инвестирует

Channel

Сорокин инвестирует

@sorokinfire

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,430subscribers

-316 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245876415
TypeChannel
Username@sorokinfire
DescriptionКак разбогатеть простому человеку? Иду к финансовой независимости и показываю, что и как делаю. Почти вышел на раннюю пенсию, но жизнь вернула обратно. https://boosty.to/sorokinfire Канал ведет - @bigsmart Реклама и коллабы - @sorokinamariya (мы за движ!)
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/sorokinfire

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,43025,74625,5886 August 2026 — 25,746 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,744 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,746 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,734 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,737 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,738 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,733 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,737 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,728 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,725 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,732 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,741 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,731 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,724 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,711 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,695 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,685 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,686 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,673 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,668 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,648 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,652 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,654 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,649 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,631 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,613 subscribers7 September 2026 — 25,616 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,617 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,627 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,620 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,606 subscribers29 September 2026 — 25,581 subscribers5 October 2026 — 25,548 subscribers9 October 2026 — 25,556 subscribers13 October 2026 — 25,542 subscribers14 October 2026 — 25,525 subscribers15 October 2026 — 25,508 subscribers17 October 2026 — 25,502 subscribers18 October 2026 — 25,506 subscribers19 October 2026 — 25,492 subscribers20 October 2026 — 25,489 subscribers22 October 2026 — 25,467 subscribers23 October 2026 — 25,470 subscribers24 October 2026 — 25,461 subscribers25 October 2026 — 25,441 subscribers26 October 2026 — 25,430 subscribers6 August 202626 October 2026
46 measurements spanning 80 days, net -316. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,383–25,793 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 05:2025,430-11
25 Oct 2026, 03:1925,441-20
24 Oct 2026, 03:3825,461-9
23 Oct 2026, 02:0625,470+3
22 Oct 2026, 03:2625,467-22
20 Oct 2026, 18:5025,489-3
19 Oct 2026, 21:0825,492-14
18 Oct 2026, 20:1725,506+4
17 Oct 2026, 23:3425,502-6
15 Oct 2026, 20:4525,508-17
14 Oct 2026, 22:3425,525-17
13 Oct 2026, 14:4625,542-14
9 Oct 2026, 15:4125,556+8
5 Oct 2026, 10:5425,548-33
29 Sept 2026, 10:5825,581-25
17 Sept 2026, 20:5625,606-14
15 Sept 2026, 15:0125,620-7
14 Sept 2026, 02:2025,627+10
12 Sept 2026, 10:1625,617+1
7 Sept 2026, 06:1725,616first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 25,430 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,150
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held98 (20 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total124,630
Reactions total1,780
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Oct 2026, 22:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
592
Videos
65
Links
442

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,152 reactions across 98 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,43734.1%
❤1,59022.2%
👍1,35418.9%
😁1,09515.3%
🦄1662.32%
💯891.24%
👏811.13%
🎃751.05%
🌚470.657%
❤‍🔥380.531%
😱220.308%
😎200.28%
🏆190.266%
👾140.196%
😨140.196%
🤔140.196%
🤝140.196%
🐳120.168%
✍110.154%
🥰80.112%
11 further kinds320.447%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 98 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sorokinfire. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 98 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactionsread 26 October 2026

В ТАКУЮ ИГРУ ТОЖЕ МОЖНО СЫГРАТЬ Есть десятки разных вариантов инвестиций, доступных ребятам с небольшими капиталами. Если постоянно ищешь тот, который даст самый сильный рост, обязательно будешь испытывать лютейшее ощущение упущенной выгоды. Рекомендация на этот счет простая — выбрать свою игру, сознательно упростить и сократить выбор вариантов до понятных и достаточно хороших. На долгосроке это эффективнее всего. …

❤2😎2🔥1🦄1

24 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC≈2,280 views58 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

БУРГЕРНЫЙ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ: РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ АКТИВОВ Пора покупать акции в мой бургерный портфель! Точнее, Я УЖЕ ВСЕ КУПИЛ! Вот какое распределение я хотел получить: — 4% в LQDT. Это аналог подушки безопасности, бургеры я буду покупать именно из нее — и потом добивать до 12-месяцев расхода дивидендами (а потом и до 18 месяцев и больше). Набор Бургер + Кола стоит 621 рубль, получается в подушке должно быть 7 452 рубля; — …

👍29😎13❤8🔥6🦄2

24 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,370 views8 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

Как заработать на квартиру себе и детям, используя законы РФ? 🏡 Вместо ипотеки под бешеные проценты, можно взять участок у государства за копейки. И это не магия, а законное право каждого гражданина. В интернете полно людей обещающих золотые горы с одной сделки, но это работает немного иначе. Если хотите реальных и законных схем – читайте канал «Доход на земеле». Его автор Михаил Спектор инвестор и ректор земельной…

❤3😎3🔥1🦄1

23 Oct 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,690 views30 reactionsread 24 October 2026

СИСТЕМА: ЗАКАНЧИВАЕМ НАБОР Вот уже три месяца я плотно работаю над Системой. Цель простая. Брать начинающих инвесторов буквально за руку и тащить к первому миллиону капитала. А потом и дальше! Внутри: — понятный трек движения — ясно, что делать и в каком порядке; — короткие уроки без воды и без всяких заумностей; — прокачанная система мотивации; — мощная система поддержки; — отзывчивое сообщество инвесторов. Важн…

😁13🔥8❤4👍3🦄2

22 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,410 views34 reactionsread 22 October 2026

ПЕРВЫЙ МИЛЛИОН ДЕЛАЮТ НЕ ПРОЦЕНТЫ Посчитал недавно одну штуку. И цифры получились довольно интересные. Берем скромные 10% годовых от капитала (я вообще-то рассчитываю на 10–12% сверх инфляции, так что цифры занижены). Сколько нужно вносить в месяц, чтобы дойти до миллиона: — за 2 года — 38 тысяч; — за 3 года — 24 тысячи; — за 5 лет — 13 тысяч; — за 10 лет — 5 тысяч. А теперь посмотрим, сколько из этого миллиона п…

😁18🔥9❤5👍1🦄1

22 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTC≈3,740 views32 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

▶️ КУПИЛ 637 КЛАДОВОК, ЧТОБЫ НИКОГДА НЕ РАБОТАТЬ | ПОДКАСТ С МАКСИМОМ ИВАНОВЫМ Сегодня у меня в гостях уникальный инвестор, амбассадор кладовок Складно, предприниматель и автор канала Максим Иванов | Доходная недвижимость. Вы не поверите, но у него в управлении сейчас более 600 кладовок, в голове не укладывается! Разузнал, как он докатился до такой жизни, и можно ли сейчас повторить его успех. Получилось очень мо…

👍11😁9🔥6❤5🦄1

22 Oct 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,860 views41 reactionsread 22 October 2026

СКОЛЬКО СТОЯТ 11 ЛЕТ? Я начал инвестировать в 2006 году. Тогда это был ПИФ Добрыня Никитич. Нормальный брокерский счет у меня появился в 2008. Помню, как тогда инвестировал 40% от офисной зарплаты и многие крутили пальцем у виска. А знаете, сколько у меня было к 2017? НОЛЬ. Мне больно это писать, но ОДИННАДЦАТЬ ГРЕБАНЫХ ЛЕТ я делал ошибки и не двигался вперед. Да что вперед, были потери в сотни тысяч и миллионы р…

🔥16❤10😁7👍5🫡3

21 Oct 2026, 16:06 UTC≈2,820 views19 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

HADL - учёт инвестиций без компромиссов Я - Теймур, инвестор и разработчик. Несколько лет делал HADL для себя, потому что в существующих трекерах мне не хватало точности и гибкости. Теперь им пользуются другие инвесторы, а блогеры ведут в нём публичные портфели. Помимо базовых функций трекера, в нем много преимуществ: Учёт - Импорт многих брокеров по API или отчётом: Т-Банк, Сбер, Альфа, БКС, Финам, ВТБ, Газпромбан…

❤6😁6👍3🔥2🦄1😨1

21 Oct 2026, 12:07 UTC≈2,110 views38 reactionsread 22 October 2026

ДИВАННЫЕ ИНВЕСТОРЫ Знаете, у каждого есть знакомый, который инвестировал в фондовый рынок. И который очень авторитетно заявляет: — Херня, денег на фондовом рынке не заработать. Знаете как обычно выглядит портфель у таких ребят? Как склад забытых вещей на вокзале. Куча разных бумаг под разные идеи, которые они надергали у блогеров или из своего собственного житейского смысла. — Кто-то пишет, что Газпром сейчас пр…

🔥14❤7👍7😁6🦄2👏1😱1

21 Oct 2026, 08:13 UTC≈3,270 views62 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

БУРГЕРНЫЙ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ: СЧЕТ ОТКРЫТ Кто не помнит, я собрался экспериментально проверять правило 4%. Каждый меясц буду брать во Вкусно и Точке набор из Биг Тейсти и большой Колы без сахара. Делать это я буду за счет капитала! Нужно отложить столько денег, чтобы 4% от них хватило на бургеры и колу в течение года. В прошлом посте я подсчитал, что отложить нужно 187 000 рублей. Набор стоит 621 рубль, 12 наборов (по …

🔥33❤16😁5👏4👀2🦄2

20 Oct 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,580 views41 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

КАК БЫСТРЕЕ ДОБЕЖАТЬ ДО ПЕРВОГО МИЛЛИОНА: ПОШАГОВАЯ ИНСТРУКЦИЯ Первый миллион — самый сложный. Опыта у начинающего инвестора недостаточно. Нет уверенности. Первые шаги в инвестициях — самые тяжелые. В четверг расскажу, как ускорить и облегчить путь к первому миллиону. Разберем, что на самом деле важно на самых первых этапах, а на что можно забить (спойлер: скорее всего вы сильно ошибаетесь в этом вопросе). Вебина…

😁15👍13❤6🔥4🦄2🎃1

19 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC≈3,630 views121 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

БУРГЕРНЫЙ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТ: ОШИБКА Бургер Кинг я выбрал удаленно — чисто изучил отзывы по интернету и побалакал с ЧатЖПТ. Вообще, процесс выбора был реально сложным. Были идеи тестировать правило 4% на шаверме, ведь это пища богов по-питерски. И это действительно мой любимый запрещенный продукт. Вот только реально больших сетей со стандартизированной шавермой нет, корректную инфляцию измерить не сможем. А стоимость ст…

❤61🔥39😁10👍7🌚2🤔1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @sorokinfire. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sorokinfire edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 October 2026
Most recent edit
20 October 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сорокин инвестирует” (@sorokinfire), 25,430 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sorokinfire.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.