Mind & market pinned a photo

Channel
Mind & market
@sostraderrr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
960subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001822694285 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sostraderrr |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sostraderrr |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 960 | -6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 966 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 970 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 965 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 967 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 967 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.30%
- avg views ÷ 960 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.41%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 165 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 16s
- Average length
- 1m 04s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بازارها میتوانند طولانیتر از مدتی که شما نقدینگی کافی دارید غیرمنطقی باقی بمانند. «جان مینارد کینس» “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”- «John Maynard Keynes»
👍2
۱۵ تیپ شخصیتی تریدرها انسانها موجوداتی احساساتی هستند، و رفتارهایی با جنبه روانی کاملاً مشخصی دارند که اغلب بر اساس مدلهای شخصیتی آنهاست. بهعلاوه وقتیکه معاملهگران بهصورت گروه گروه در قالب یک توده در میآیند، رفتار کلی روانشناسی آنها بازار را به حرکت در میآورد و الگوهای قیمتیای را که تحلیلگران تکنیکال را به هیجان میآورد درست میکند. عموما زمانی که فعالیتهای معاملهگری منجر به ایجاد سود و ضررهای بزرگ می…
معاملهگر با دقت – The Accurate Trader این معاملهگران بهخاطر تمایلشان برای استفاده از تحلیل با جزئیات بسیار زیاد و داشتن سابقه بسیار دقیق و ویژه، موردتوجه هستند. معاملهگرانی با این خصوصیات روانی اغلب نکاتی با جزئیات بسیار در مورد فرآیند تصمیمگیریهایشان در ژورنال معاملاتی خود نگه میدارند که میتواند به آنها در معاملاتشان در آینده کمک بسیار کند. بهخاطر سختگیری و توجه بسیار به تحلیل و نگهداشتن سوابق معاملات،…
معاملهگر ریزبین – The Detailed Trader خصوصیات معاملهگر ریزبین با فرایند تحلیلی مقدماتی قبل از گرفتن یک معامله در بازار مشخص میشود. معاملهگر ریزبین از ارزیابی منطقی و تحلیل با دقت و یادداشت کردن نکات بسیار حساس در معاملات و دلایل انجام آنها شناخته میشود. با اینهمه اکثر معاملهگران با این خصوصیات روانی در دام مشکل “تعلل زیاد برای انجام معامله یا بستن آن” میافتند که منجر به بازده بسیار کمی در کار آنها میشود. …
صبور باش رفیق...
کسی که تصمیم میگیره تریدر بشه، اولش برای پول و درآمد وارد این مسیر میشه... اما بعد از مدتی متوجه میشه ماجرا جدی تر از این حرفاس و متوجه میشه قراره تغییر کنه، ادم بهتری بشه شاید بشه گفت بهترینه خودش... تغییر همیشه دردناکه یا از سمتی میشه گفت درد تو بیشتر مواقع نشونه تغییره... یه جمله ای هست از نیچه که میگه، هر جیزی که تو رو نکشه،. فقط قویترت میکنه.. اگر تو مسیرت داری درد میکشی نگران نباش رفیق تو مسیر رشدی... زنده ب…
❤1
شانس چیز عجیبی نیست جز، آماده بودن پیوسته انسان در زندگی... هرچه آماده تر و آگاه تر،،، خوشانس تر... موافقی؟
❤1👍1
برای بار هزار و یکم تحلیل گر خوبی بودن شما رو به جمع تریدر های سوده وارد میکنه، اما برای وارد شدن به جمع تریدر های حرفه ای نیازه فکرتون متفاوت از تریدر های معمول باشه. نکات مهمی تو ویدئو گفته شد بخشی از اونها: - من هرگز بیشتر از 1% رو در معاملاتم درگیر نمیکنم. - اصولا استاپ بر مبنی استراتژی، نماد و تایم فریم سنجیده میشه نه یک قانون ثابت -مدیریت ریسک سخت نیست بلکه یکسری قوانین سادس این که کی داره اجراش میکنه سختش میکن…
👏1
Mind & market pinned «دوستانی که اعلام ضرر ده بودن کردن بنظرتون دلیلش چیه ؟»
دوستانی که اعلام ضرر ده بودن کردن بنظرتون دلیلش چیه ؟
- استراتژی ورود مشخص ندارم50%
- نمیتونم جهت روند رو درست تحلیل کنم، صعودی یا نزولی بودن و ترید در جهتش بیشتر وقت ها اشتباهه8%
- تحلیل و ستاپ دارم خوبم هست، منتها مدیریت سرمایه ندارم، ریسکم بالاس خراب میکنم25%
- همچیز خوبه منتها بعد باز شدن معامله خرابش میکنم، قبل حد سود میبندم یا استاپ رو الکی جابجا میکنم و...25%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Mind & market pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sostraderrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دوستانی که اعلام ضرر ده بودن کردن بنظرتون دلیلش چیه ؟
- استراتژی ورود مشخص ندارم50%
- نمیتونم جهت روند رو درست تحلیل کنم، صعودی یا نزولی بودن و ترید در جهتش بیشتر وقت ها اشتباهه8%
- تحلیل و ستاپ دارم خوبم هست، منتها مدیریت سرمایه ندارم، ریسکم بالاس خراب میکنم25%
- همچیز خوبه منتها بعد باز شدن معامله خرابش میکنم، قبل حد سود میبندم یا استاپ رو الکی جابجا میکنم و...25%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
درحال حاضر در کدوم شرایط هستید.؟
- سوده هستم18%
- ضرر ده هستم82%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آیا گزترش براتون مفید بود؟
- بله57%
- خیر7%
- راستش نخوندم43%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sostraderrr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drarashamini · 29,184
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
@trader_3D · 22,459
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
@farachart · 42,989
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@battle_trading · 69,865
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@Glory_Trader · 26,649
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mind & market” (@sostraderrr), 960 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sostraderrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.