Channel created

Channel
Сота-резерв
@sotavision
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
227subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001524048118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sotavision |
| Created | 23 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sotavision |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 227 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 225 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 227 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 226 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 228 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 228 | +2 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 226 | first reading |
Engagement
1 post held, back to 23 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1 post for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Showing the 1 most recent of 1 post we hold for @sotavision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@kolezev · 59,88121 postsReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,2626 postsКолбасный центризм
@varusgivememy2007 · 25 posts❗️Mordor Post❗️
@go_help · 2562 posts🌐 «Новости регионов»
@BP_Regions · 31 postLive And Let Live
@buddypositive · 81 postМучительные лонгриды
@myeyeshurtsomuch · 11 postНавальный | Протест | Свобода
@navalniy_life · 11 post#неДепутат
@nedepytat2020 · 511 postАдминресурс
@noadminsource · 1051 postАкции в поддержку политзаключенных и преследуемых по политическим мотивам
@politactions · 261 postPro et Contra
@proetcontra · 301 postСпасём Алексея Дмитриева!
@savealexdmitriev · 1701 post6 марта 15:00, Москва
@stopwarmsk · 3811 postMy1976
@xtra001 · 21 post"Экстремисты": за что сажают в России
@zapretno_info · 5911 postХабаровск - РФ | За Фургала - За право выбора | ЯГражданин!
@zavibor_2020 · 1511 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…beispielsweise mit Plakaten „ich habe keine Angst“ oder anderen.[https://t.me/sotavision/38838?singleSOTA t.me], 16. April 2022. Der Protest in…”
read 13 September 2026
“…удалили канал «Вечер с Владимиром Соловьёвым»{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/sotavision/36806 |title=SOTA |access-date=2022-03-08 |archive-date=2022-03-08…”
read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сота-резерв” (@sotavision), 227 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sotavision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.