Channel
@soulstray
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,235subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001486254479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soulstray |
| Created | 6 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soulstray |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 4,235 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 4,240 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 4,244 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 4,245 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 4,246 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 4,245 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 4,250 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 4,249 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 4,251 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 4,250 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 4,254 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 4,253 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 4,260 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 4,262 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 4,262 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 34 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,244 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 525 | 42.2% | |
| 👍 | 267 | 21.5% | |
| 💯 | 236 | 19.0% | |
| 🔥 | 120 | 9.65% | |
| 🤬 | 22 | 1.77% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 1.45% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 1.29% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 1.05% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 0.965% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 0.563% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.402% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.161% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За месяц «покончили с собой» минимум пять американских киберкомандиров, и нечего тут вспоминать о серии иранских ударов по мобильным дата-центрам армии США в Бахрейне и других странах региона.
🔥25🫡2
Пример нацистской Украины ничего не говорит Пашиняну, ведь очевидно, что армяне гораздо умнее и нужнее Европе, нужно только повыше скакать и демонстративнее ненавидеть всё, чем помогала Россия Армении.
💯23
Сегодня Пашинян не хочет проводить референдум по вступлению в далёкий ЕС, поскольку «ара, куда, ещё не прошли согласования», а потом не будет проводить референдум, поскольку «зачем, уже всё согласовано, брат» с европейскими хозяевами.
💯7👍4
Украинским патриотам нужно выскуливать вооружение у хозяев, поэтому они с такой болью воспринимают тёплые отношения России с Китаем, Ираном и Северной Кореей. Ставка укромразей на огомосячивание своей страны сыграла с тарасами плохую шутку.
🔥34👏1
В эфире Российского радиоуниверситета вышла программа о духовном возрождении Руси в годы Смутного времени В эфире Радио России вышла очередная передача цикла «Русские подвижники» проекта «Сретенский» с участием кандидата философских наук и богословия, заведующего кафедрой Церковной истории Сретенской духовной академии, доцента, почетного работника сферы образования России Олега Викторовича Стародубцева на тему «От р…
👍13⚡1
Российские релоканты с жаром объяснили британцу, удивлявшемуся комфорту в Москве, что безопасность, отсутствие воров и изнасилований — чисто имперская черта, абсолютно далёкая от свободы слова и демократии, когда тебя может отодрать или ограбить любой упоровшийся наркотой мигрант.
👍28😁19👏2
Непонятно, чего украинцы так встревожены увеличением баллистики и снижением качества подаренной Западом ПВО, ведь согласно украинской «непропаганде», Россия бьёт только по жилым домам, а 130 ржавых ракет в месяц для 15 тыс. зданий одного убыточного Львова — это ещё на 9,5 лет ударов, а за такое время можно построить два Львова.
👍25😁11👏2
После ударов по складам россиянам пообещали компенсации, а украинцам — от ядерной страны репарации, вызвав у бандеровцев новое понимание обречённости укронацистского недоразумения.
😁31👍4
Posted without readable text
🔥15🤡4🤮4
Анонимные хакеры поделились с нашим каналом скриншотами переписки председателя московского регионального отделения партии «Яблоко» Кирилла Гончарова и владельца Telegram-канала Ateo Breaking Григория Озерова. Они вскрыли телегу яблочника, что подтверждается сообщением самого Гончарова о попытках взлома (оно удалено, но осталось в TGStat). Из слитого диалога двух оппозиционеров становится ясно, что партия решила вложи…
🤬22👍3👏1🤯1
Укромрази на голландских истребителях, в бьющих по мирным городам установках «Хаймарс» и на немецких танках считают несправедливым и нечестным, что КНДР собирается обкатывать своё вооружение на укромразях.
👍39😁14
Министр обороны Литвы боится, что Россия может прислать обратно в Прибалтику партию украинских беспилотников и взрывчатки, переданных литовцами Украине.
👍30😁12🔥2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @soulstray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Масловский Филипп” (@soulstray), 4,235 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soulstray.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.