Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Scourge Of Photography

Channel

The Scourge Of Photography

@sourgeOfPhotography

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

332subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003397140320
TypeChannel
Username@sourgeOfPhotography
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sourgeOfPhotography

Growth

3243323286 August 2026 — 324 subscribers7 August 2026 — 324 subscribers15 August 2026 — 326 subscribers22 August 2026 — 332 subscribers28 August 2026 — 331 subscribers7 September 2026 — 332 subscribers6 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 323–333 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 04:41332+1
28 Aug 2026, 14:32331-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:47332+6
15 Aug 2026, 00:28326+2
7 Aug 2026, 12:18324no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:31324first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC116 viewsread 6 August 2026

XY Problem What is it? The XY problem is asking about your attempted solution rather than your actual problem. This leads to enormous amounts of wasted time and energy, both on the part of people asking for help, and on the part of those providing help. * User wants to do X. * User doesn't know how to do X, but thinks they can fumble their way to a solution if they can just manage to do Y. * User doesn't know how

3 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC111 viewsread 6 August 2026

I also advise you to take advice and knowledge from people of knowledge, not beginners sharing quotes and snippets of them. This is your personal life. Just like you don't treat yourself based on online medical articles, but instead ask an actual doctor about your specific case. I highly suspect this stems from false information. You might be able to hear that the sheikh is weirded out by the question and describe

3 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC105 viewsread 6 August 2026

From time to time we see another mutation of this question. I could only guess there is systematic failure making people put themselves in these situations. I'm craving a rant, because this is not good at all, but, here is a suggestion: You're suffering from what's called the XY problem. You keep assuming a solution, and asking sheikhs why that solution is not working. You should instead ask them about your prob

3 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC94 viewsread 6 August 2026

Summary: Question: The suitor is far, can we use tasweer since he wants to see the sister before he travels to her? Answer: No.

3 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC100 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @BOT_9_9_1Voice message

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته. هل تنصحون الأخوات بالتواصل مع الإخوة الملتزمين بالشريعة عبر التطبيقات؟ أحيانًا يكون الإخوة في الخارج يدرسون الإسلام، وتكون الأخوات في بلدانٍ بعيدة. فإذا تواصلوا عبر هذه التطبيقات، فكيف تنصحون الأخوات بشأن الرؤية الشرعية؟ هل يرسلن صورةً، أو يظهرن بوجوههن للإخوة في مكالمةٍ مرئية بوجود وليهن؟ أم ينتظرن حتى يتمكن الإخوة من زيارة بلدانهن؟ وماذا إذا اشترط الأخ النظر إليها اولاً لأنه في بلدٍ

27 Jul 2026, 22:40 UTC170 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @uponthepathofsalaf

Summary of the Answer to Question 11: Question: What is the ruling on attending a family member’s wedding when there will be photography and video recording? Should I avoid attending in order to preserve family ties? The issue is not that you may appear in a photograph or video. Rather, the munkar is the act of producing images and videos of animate beings, and this is the wrongdoing that you are witnessing. {وَٱل

27 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC207 viewsread 6 August 2026

Part 2: Protect Your Time Against the Illusion of Virtue السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته We have to be incredibly careful not to fall into the trap of endless debating. It is so easy to find yourself active in a gazillion groups (WhatsApp, Telegram, and social media) completely convinced that spending hours typing back and forth is daʿwah or defending the Sunnah. But we need to check our intentions, because this i

27 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC206 viewsread 6 August 2026

Part 1 — The Cord and the Boundary: Knowing Your Audience in Taṣwīr Discourse السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته My advice to myself and to my brothers who are convinced of the impermissibility of taṣwīr is simple: let go and move on from this issue. You seek knowledge to benefit yourself, those around you, and those who ask you. You yourself have benefited, al-ḥamdu lillāh. But those around you? Maybe not. Should y

22 Jul 2026, 20:41 UTC246 viewsread 6 August 2026

I'll Just Follow Ibn Bāz and Use Taṣwīr For Daʿwah Zayd: I'll just follow Ibn Bāz and use taṣwīr for daʿwah. Thinking about it, it only makes sense. Islām is not strict, and this opinion of saying photography is impermissible in all cases is so extreme—it doesn't work well practically. Bakr: But that's ḥarām. You can't use ḥarām for daʿwah; that defeats the purpose... Zayd: Look, akhī, Allāh told us to ask the peo

21 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC244 viewsread 6 August 2026

Note: We do look for reconciliation between the statements and actions of the people of knowledge, as they often have a reason that we mistake as a contradiction. The books of scholars are full of this, and they're the ones who gather all pieces of the puzzle. The difference between the Prophet ﷺ and them is that there is a chance they are mistaken, but, we don't rush to that conclusion, as that's not from respectin

21 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC222 viewsread 6 August 2026

A questioner asks concerning the view of Shaykh Al-Fawzān on taṣwīr. How can we reconcile between his action and his fatwa? Answer: As for that which is maʿrūf (known) the Shaykh حفظه الله makes picture-making ḥarām and he speaks very severely about this. He refutes those that make pictures, and he refutes those that make picture-making permissible in many different audios and many different books. This is found a

14 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC366 viewsread 6 August 2026

Question: Can I share videos after blurring the heads? Answer: Allāh has not made it so difficult to find clean materials. Why would you put yourself in such position? But let's assume you somehow can only find a tainted source: In that case, you could easily use an online converter, just google: "video to audio online". Here's a suggestion: https://www.freeconvert.com/convert/video-to-mp3 You can also use PipeP

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sourgeOfPhotography. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Scourge Of Photography” (@sourgeOfPhotography), 332 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sourgeOfPhotography.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.