Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Souverän leben & kreativ gestalten

Channel

Souverän leben & kreativ gestalten

@souveraenleben_ch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

299subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964235093
TypeChannel
Username@souveraenleben_ch
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/souveraenleben_ch

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2963002987 August 2026 — 297 subscribers8 August 2026 — 297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 296 subscribers21 August 2026 — 297 subscribers27 August 2026 — 299 subscribers4 September 2026 — 300 subscribers13 September 2026 — 299 subscribers2997 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 295–301 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 01:38299-1
4 Sept 2026, 01:35300+1
27 Aug 2026, 23:24299+2
21 Aug 2026, 01:23297+1
14 Aug 2026, 16:44296-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:05297no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:03297first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1937.3%
🥰1529.4%
💯611.8%
😁611.8%
😍59.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC96 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁2

Signed AmRue

5 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @genau_mein_humorPhoto

So erkennt ihr KI/ Fake Bilder, an den eingekreisten Objekten

😁1

Signed AmRue

5 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC92 viewsread 7 August 2026

Im obigen Fall kann man auch von absichtlicher Fehlleitung sprechen 😂😂😂

Signed AmRue

4 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dieser GIA-Bericht von Kim Goguen wurde am 27.7.2026 bezüglich des GIA-Update (unitednetwork.earth) veröffentlicht, das für Abonnenten verfügbar ist. Bevor es das gab, was wir heute als «Deep State» bezeichnen, gab es Königshäuser, Militärs, Geheimdienste und Wissenschaftler – aber woher stammt der «Deep State» eigentlich? Vielleicht erinnern Sie sich an die Finanzbücher, Finanzdokumente und globalen Strukturen des

👍1

Signed AmRue

4 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍1

Signed AmRue

3 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC116 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheNatureApothecaryVideo

Smiles for the day ☺️ Credit: kietfreedomforlife T.me/TheNatureApothecary T.me/TheNatureApothecaryChat

💯1

Signed AmRue

2 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HDKTelegramVideo

Der Rosenthal-Effekt 1️⃣ 1965 führte der Psychologe Rosenthal ein Experiment durch, das später viele ablehnten – nicht, weil es falsch war, sondern weil es unbequem war. Teilnehmenden wurde gesagt, bestimmte Personen hätten ein besonders hohes Potenzial, obwohl diese Auswahl zufällig war. Nach nur acht Wochen verhielten sich diese Menschen anders: Sie entschieden schneller, zweifelten weniger an sich und ihre Leis

👍1

Signed AmRue

1 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dieser GIA-Bericht von Kim Goguen wurde am 27.7.2026 bezüglich des GIA-Update (unitednetwork.earth) veröffentlicht, das für Abonnenten verfügbar ist. Bevor es das gab, was wir heute als «Deep State» bezeichnen, gab es Königshäuser, Militärs, Geheimdienste und Wissenschaftler – aber woher stammt der «Deep State» eigentlich? Vielleicht erinnern Sie sich an die Finanzbücher, Finanzdokumente und globalen Strukturen des

👍1

Signed AmRue

1 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC129 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Spielen macht allen Lebewesen Freude.

🥰3👍1

Signed AmRue

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @souveraenleben_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚛️🦁 Gesund im Ganzen
@Loewentatze · 33,754
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Souverän leben & kreativ gestalten” (@souveraenleben_ch), 299 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/souveraenleben_ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.