Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Канал Свободного Человека

Channel

Канал Свободного Человека

@sozdatelthebest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,638subscribers

-171 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678838526
TypeChannel
Username@sozdatelthebest
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sozdatelthebest

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,63812,80912,723.57 August 2026 — 12,809 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,809 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,801 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,780 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,778 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,765 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,762 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,753 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,742 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,734 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,730 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,718 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,711 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,706 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,713 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,712 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,704 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,692 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,681 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,680 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,678 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,680 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,676 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,677 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,673 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,657 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,652 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,648 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,645 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,638 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -171. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,612–12,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:1712,638-7
14 Sept 2026, 15:3712,645-3
13 Sept 2026, 04:1512,648-4
11 Sept 2026, 03:5812,652-5
8 Sept 2026, 06:3712,657-16
5 Sept 2026, 03:5612,673-4
3 Sept 2026, 07:3712,677+1
1 Sept 2026, 04:1412,676-4
31 Aug 2026, 02:3412,680+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:0812,678-2
29 Aug 2026, 02:1312,680-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:0212,681-11
27 Aug 2026, 01:2512,692-12
26 Aug 2026, 00:4212,704-8
25 Aug 2026, 04:1312,712-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:2412,713+7
22 Aug 2026, 06:1512,706-5
20 Aug 2026, 23:1412,711-7
19 Aug 2026, 19:5712,718-12
18 Aug 2026, 16:5612,730first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.16%
avg views ÷ 12,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
905
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held76 (25 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total11,771
Reactions total671
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 44s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,126 reactions across 76 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
83520.2%
❤‍🔥81219.7%
🔥78018.9%
💯70217.0%
👍2475.99%
🏆1854.48%
👏1543.73%
🙏852.06%
🤣631.53%
😁591.43%
390.945%
🤩300.727%
🎉270.654%
🥰190.46%
🤗170.412%
150.364%
🤪100.242%
👌80.194%
😍80.194%
🕊50.121%
9 further kinds260.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
669
across the posts below
Posts paid on
63
of 76 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
58
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sozdatelthebest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC728 views86 reactions17 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вот ребята, обалденно, посмотрите. Нашёл свою фотку, которая показывает мою зажимность и поломки в полной красе. То есть вот это человек еще до того как снял зажимы. Около 10 лет назад. В нём нет ни одного процента от текущей личности, ни в визуале, ни в здоровье, ни в психике и поведении. Вы же сами понимаете, что это не Александр Российский. —- Я специально вам показал и подчеркнул, какие серьезнейшие проблемы

❤‍🔥4219👏10🔥5💯4🤔32🏆1

30 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC807 views54 reactions12 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Спасибо вам большое ребята! Эта поддержка много значит и для меня, а еще больше для новичков. Которые благодаря вашей обратной связи, могут понять, что это действительно сверх ценно. Потому что, просто осознайте, насколько мои знания и методика должны быть ценны и насколько они должны помогать, чтобы люди не просто помогли себе и забыли. А чтобы даже спустя месяцы и годы, люди возвращались и говорили: — Александр,

❤‍🔥28💯11🙏7👍43🔥1

29 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC795 views41 reactions15 Starsread 2 September 2026

Кстати в том же мобильном приложении доступны Психосоматические команды и Психоэмоциональные корректировки. Теперь это стало мега удобным, не нужно отдельно видео искать и запускать. Все в приложении находится. Кто не знает что это такое, ас описано — и вы даже можете провести один тестовый сеанс и почувствовать на себе как это работает. Не нужно гадать подходит или нет. Просто возьми наушники, вечером ляг спокой

🥰12🔥8🤩7💯5😍54

29 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC816 views49 reactions12 Starsread 2 September 2026

Ребят на моём youtube канале вышел новый ролик на очень важную и актуальную тему на сегодня. Как Сохранить Психику в Военное Время. И к этому приуроченно создание моего мобильного приложении для новичков, которое называется UNLOCK. Приложение специально имеет стоимость доступной для всех (9900 рублей), и оно направлено именно на избавление от проблематики хронического напряжения и тревоги — чтобы здесь и сейчас мо

❤‍🔥19👏14🤩73🔥3🕊3

29 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC831 views56 reactions11 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video

Ребята, я не знаю. Для меня это всё походит на карго-культ. Знаете что такое карго-культ? Это когда первобытные попуасы не понимая причинно следственной связи, делают какие-то нелепые вещи, мечтая получить желаемый результат. Вот здесь аналогичная ситуация. У человека нет понимания отчего берется эта состояние. С какой тканью работаем. Как работаем. Откуда тревога, почему тревога. Просто есть понимание что нужно

❤‍🔥20💯13🏆106👍6🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC925 views63 reactions12 Starsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

Диван конечно же давно ушёл в первые же сутки. Но развал схождение в башке у человека произошло только через неделю)) — А потом я вам скажу больше — Потом у зажимного включается «ФОМО». То есть «фомо» - это такое чувство упощенной возможности. Когда очень обидно и досадно. Когда кажется что упустил очень сильную и выгодную возможность. И это чувство зажимного человека, дальше заставляет делать еще более тупые и

💯26159🔥7❤‍🔥3😁2👍1

27 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC853 views24 reactions7 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Что 🤦‍♂️😄

😁16🗿5🙉3

26 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC976 views73 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ребята, хочу поднять серьёзную тему. Вот задумайтесь. Я для интереса задал пару вопросов ИИ от гугла через поисковик. В ответ на что он дал просто самую настоящую чушь — откровенную дезинформацию. То есть вы понимаете, это ни ошибки, ни недочёты, а он прямо сделал черное — белым. Он извратил полностью смысл, выдумал отсебятину — он приписал мне и моей концепции то с чем я как раз борюсь и не согласен. Какие то про

💯26🏆1412❤‍🔥8🫡4🔥3😁3👍2

25 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,020 views66 reactions9 Starsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💯2812👏96🔥4🙏4😁2🤨1

25 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,020 views69 reactions10 Starsread 2 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💯28🔥13🏆117😁5😱4🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,060 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Как вы считаете ребят, это прикольный диван?

  1. Да45%
  2. Нет23%
  3. Если бы была возможность такой получить бесплатно — точно бы взял29%
  4. Даже даром не нужен10%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13👌6👍5

25 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC940 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вот этот диванчик. Как вы считаете прикольный? Ну уж точно не хлам. Давайте проголосуем.

👍297🤗6🤩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @sozdatelthebest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTCAnonymous Poll202 voters

Как вы считаете ребят, это прикольный диван?

  1. Да45%
  2. Нет23%
  3. Если бы была возможность такой получить бесплатно — точно бы взял29%
  4. Даже даром не нужен10%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тимофей Кармацкий
@karmatsky_timofey · 187,026
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Dreamer
@dreamertim · 40,955
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Антон Мажирин - духовный тренер
@AntonPrednaznachenie · 39,472
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Канал Свободного Человека” (@sozdatelthebest), 12,638 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sozdatelthebest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.