Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sparks & Stripes

Channel

Sparks & Stripes

@sparksandstripes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

735subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001721898917
TypeChannel
Username@sparksandstripes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sparksandstripes

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7177377277 August 2026 — 717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 717 subscribers15 August 2026 — 720 subscribers22 August 2026 — 726 subscribers30 August 2026 — 735 subscribers7 September 2026 — 737 subscribers16 September 2026 — 735 subscribers7357 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 714–740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:36735-2
7 Sept 2026, 19:40737+2
30 Aug 2026, 16:47735+9
22 Aug 2026, 22:13726+6
15 Aug 2026, 03:13720+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:48717no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:37717first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

695 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16623.9%
❤15922.9%
👍8311.9%
🕊476.76%
😁466.62%
🤣436.19%
😭385.47%
😢314.46%
🥰233.31%
🍾202.88%
💯172.45%
🙏71.01%
❤‍🔥60.863%
😍50.719%
🍓10.144%
👀10.144%
🤔10.144%
🦄10.144%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,630 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Поможем Споттеру собрать смешного с КаБушем в главной роли Как Кайл Буш в миджете застрял: #NASCAR

❤12🔥11😁5👍1

23 May 2026, 12:08 UTC778 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The next race that Dale Earnhardt would’ve raced in had he not passed was postponed by rain. The next race that Kyle Busch would’ve raced in had he not passed was postponed by rain.

😢29😭3👍1

22 May 2026, 21:01 UTC670 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Старт гонки пикапов перенесён на 2:00 Мск из-за возможного дождя. Приходите, буду комментировать.

❤9

22 May 2026, 03:22 UTC≈6,880 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это перевод текста Джеффа Глака для The Athletic о Кайле Буше. "Примерно в то время, когда Кайл Буш переживал самые противоречивые времена в отношениях со СМИ, мне предложили узнать его получше, проведя с ним время в пустыне. В те времена Буш обожал гонять на своем сэндкаре по высоким дюнам Мохаве. С двигателем от машины НАСКАР на легком автомобиле, Буш мчался по песку, взлетал на крутые холмы, поворачивал и падал,…

🕊47❤17👍6

13 Apr 2026, 21:54 UTC952 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С реакциями на канале и так нет никаких проблем, за что всем читателям большое спасибо! Но! У меня тут появилась подборка с 50 карточками про семью Петти, и если вы хотите расширенный контент из них, накидайте любых позитивных реакций на этот пост. С удовольствием закопаюсь

🔥46🍾20❤17❤‍🔥5💯3🍓1👍1

11 Apr 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,120 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вообще про Пскентский автополигон я знаю достаточно давно, но вот актуальных видео, да ещё с кусочком онборда, не попадалось. Понятно, что по большому овалу никто не гоняет, но жители Узбекистана всё равно могут говорить, что у них есть свой #NASCAR дома :)

🔥30😁8❤6👍3👀1

8 Apr 2026, 20:31 UTC994 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не успеваю формулировать какие-то отдельные мысли для этого канала. Всё озвучиваю в эфирах, подкасте и утренней передаче. Ну, хоть похвастаюсь новым красивым приобретением, почему нет?

🥰22🔥12👍10❤2❤‍🔥1

1 Mar 2026, 19:52 UTC≈1,380 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я тут пару раз писал, что в НАСКАР были/есть хакеры системы определения чемпиона. Но что же нам делать с хакером регламента и чемпионата Индикар?... Завидовать. И ждать другой регламент который будет ещё хуже

😁30👍3🤔1

27 Feb 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,190 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Близко рассматриваем автомобили #MazdaCup в Сент-Пите вместе с Максом из Филадельфии! На Be on Edge совсем скоро можно будет увидеть эту технику в деле (время Мск): - 1-я гонка, суббота, 15:30, комментируют Иван Лапшин и Никита Терешин - 2-я гонка, полночь с воскресенья на понедельник, комментирую я

❤13🔥1

6 Feb 2026, 21:08 UTC≈8,940 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Под открытие зимней Олимпиады вспомним, что стараниями видного гонщика #NASCAR Джеффа Бодайна с 2006-го по 2010-й среди американских гонщиков проводились бобслейные соревнования. Всё потому, что Бодайн эти самые бобы с 1992-го года и строил. Последний челлендж выиграл некий Логано, на видео как раз он :)

❤23🔥8👍5

18 Jan 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,370 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если вы думали, что Молния Маккуин в #MazdaCup — это круто, то как бы да, круто, но недостаточно. А вот Кричащий Сицилиец — совсем другое дело! https://t.me/racingbuckets/4768

🔥11👍2🦄1

12 Jan 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,330 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПРОВОЦИРУЮ ОТПИСКИ Что думаю про новый-старый формат Кубка #NASCAR Чейз лучше ПО? Да, определённо. Даже в игровых видах спорта США предпочитают серию, а не одно решающее что-то. Менее случайный чемпион — это точно хорошо. Но напомню, что у Погони тоже был свой "хакер", так что не расстраивайтесь сильно, если чемпион вам снова не понравится :) Хорошо ли, что победа теперь не является почти гарантией прохода? Думаю,…

🔥26👍5😁3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sparksandstripes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Башмаков о гонках
@bashmakov_v_racing · 34,292
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Вестникъ Формул
@vestnikformul · 28,056
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
evgenymoto - трансляции МотоГП и ВСБК на русском!
@rumotosport · 25,105
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sparks & Stripes” (@sparksandstripes), 735 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sparksandstripes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.