Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Spassky.pro Китай

Channel

Spassky.pro Китай

@spasskychina

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,610subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722818900
TypeChannel
Username@spasskychina
Created31 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/spasskychina

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,6101,6271,618.57 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,623 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,621 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,622 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,621 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,616 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,611 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,612 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,610 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 40 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,607–1,630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 00:221,610-2
12 Sept 2026, 14:401,612+1
8 Sept 2026, 07:371,611-5
3 Sept 2026, 09:461,616-5
27 Aug 2026, 20:021,621-1
21 Aug 2026, 01:241,622+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:271,621-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:531,623-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:161,627no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:061,627first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4170.7%
🔥1322.4%
😱23.45%
👏11.72%
😁11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дал комментарий Европейско-Азиатским новостям о ситуации с китайскими автоперевозчиками https://eanews.ru/ekaterinburg/20260807102708/kitayskie-perevozchiki-potesnili-rossiyskie-kompanii-s-vnutrennego-rynka

🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC116 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zakupki_time

🤩 Вице-президент Российско-Китайской гильдии коммерции Максим Спасский о последствии атак на склады Wildberries в комментарии для канала «Время госзакупок»: — Разрушение складских хабов Wildberries, которое на первый взгляд выглядит как катастрофа для рынка отечественной е-коммерции, на самом деле удивительным образом совпало с глубинным стратегическим сдвигом самих маркетплейсов в сторону китайских селлеров. ​Росс

🔥1😱1

27 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC150 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_network

Posted without readable text

🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC156 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EanNewsPhoto

Гибель товаров на складах Wildberries не отпугнет китайский бизнес от продажи через маркетплейсы Как пояснили опрошенные ЕАН специалисты по работе с предпринимателями из КНР, китайские партнеры мало что теряют от ударов ВСУ по логистике российской компании. В первую очередь потому, что китайский бизнес старался не хранить свой товар на складах в России. А за выкупленную селлерами продукцию, которая погибла на склада

🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC136 viewsread 7 August 2026

Дал комментарий ЕАН на тему китайских селлеров и WB

23 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_network

🧱 Строительство цементного завода (Joint Venture) ​Инвестор: Zhonggang Construction Group. ​Объем инвестиций: 1 000 000 000 ¥ (1 миллиард юаней). ​Цель проекта: Строительство и запуск цементного завода в России проектной мощностью 1,5 млн тонн продукции в год. ​Требования к российскому партнеру: ​Долевое участие наличными — 20%. ​Обеспечение полного пакета разрешительной документации и формальностей для открыти

🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_network

🇨🇳 Новые возможности в Polza Network: Инвестиционные предложения из КНР! 🚀 ​Друзья, выходим на новый уровень B2B-кооперации! ​В нашем сообществе запускается регулярная публикация инвестиционных предложений и проектов от китайских компаний, заинтересованных в партнерстве, соинвестировании и совместном развитии бизнеса с российским предпринимателями. ​💡 Что вас ждет: ​Прямой доступ к B2B-запросам и проектам из Кита

👍1

15 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC200 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚛🇨🇳 Автоперевозки из Китая в Россию заметно подорожали — за последний месяц ставки выросли на 15–25%. Например, доставка фуры по маршруту Шанхай — Москва теперь обходится примерно в 1,05–1,1 млн ₽ вместо 730–750 тыс. ₽ еще весной. 📈 Главная причина — не столько рост цен на топливо, сколько топливный кризис, очереди на АЗС и погранпереходах. Из-за длительных простоев грузовики проходят меньше километров в сутки, срок

👍4

13 Jul 2026, 04:35 UTC159 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_network

🇨🇳 Как общаться с китайскими коллегами, чтобы ваши предложения читали? ​Многие предприниматели выкладывают коммерческие предложения и презентации в B2B-чаты исключительно на английском или русском языках. Однако такая стратегия часто приводит к потере потенциальных контрактов. ​Ниже собраны ключевые рекомендации по эффективной деловой коммуникации с азиатскими партнерами. ​📉 Почему английский или русский текст сни

👍1

10 Jul 2026, 04:18 UTC171 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 КИТАЙСКИЕ КИБОРГИ НА ПОРОГЕ НОВОЙ ЭКСПАНСИИ: ЧТО ОНИ СОЖРУТ СЛЕДУЮЩИМ? ​Коллеги, давайте снимем розовые очки и посмотрим на рынок ТРЕЗВО — без иллюзий и скрытых потерь. ​Многие до сих пор хихикают над китайским автопромом и верят в «немецкое качество». Очнитесь: Китай уже ПОБЕДИЛ на рынке солнечных панелей, электромобилей, лидаров и дронов. В 2026 году они контролируют 95% мирового рынка автомобильных лидаров и

👍3

8 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC157 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_network

🧠 Какой навык превращает блеклые идеи в миллиардные империи, пока остальные просто мечтают? ​В психологии есть крутой прием — «зеркалить» собеседника, чтобы мгновенно поймать одну волну и добиться доверия. В бизнесе этот супернавык называется построением системы Мотивации. ​Любой, даже самый гениальный продукт требует продаж. Но именно здесь 99% предпринимателей с треском проигрывают битву за рынок. ​🛑 В чем главн

🔥5

7 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC156 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polza_networkPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @spasskychina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Spassky.pro Китай” (@spasskychina), 1,610 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spasskychina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.