Channel
@spblor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,143subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002337835622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @spblor |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/spblor |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 1,143 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 1,141 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:29 | 1,146 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 1,150 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 1,151 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,150 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,151 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 1,151 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
46 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 45.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 19.6% | |
| custom 5397914133108627732 | 8 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5397618553459317717 | 4 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5337219222944622382 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.17% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока ехали в командировку, сделал для себя открытие в виде «Детский метал-хор Всесоюзного радио». На фоне засилия ИИ первая мысль была, что это очередной искусственный проект. Но оказалось — нет, вполне себе из плоти и крови🙂 В общем, у всех, кому это название откликается где-то в сердце, рекомендую к прослушиванию. Очень интересное звучание 👀 А неделя была весьма обычной, было пару очень красивых ушек, отложу на …
❤2
Фотокарточки из очень короткой семейной поездки выходного дня домой, в Татарстан ❤️ Успел увидеться с родными и даже встретиться с одноклассниками. P.S. Всем, с кем не получилось пересечься — это был настоящий татарский набег. В следующий раз приеду уже на подольше 🙂 #лорспб #лорхирург #лорхирургспб
❤6❤🔥1custom 53976185534593177171custom 53979141331086277321
Слово дня — ринотиллексомания Так называется навязчивое ковыряние в носу, которое относится к спектру обсессивно-компульсивных расстройств. Одно из возможных последствий — перфорация перегородки носа. Именно её вы видите на фотографиях. У этого пациента, помимо постоянного удаления корок из носа, был ещё один фактор риска — использование сосудосуживающих капель более 20 лет. В литературе описаны и гораздо более т…
custom 53979141331086277326❤3custom 53372192229446223823👍2
Один из ответов на вопрос: «Что будет, если ничего не делать?» На приём обратилась пациентка с кондуктивной тугоухостью II степени, практически переходящей в III степень. При таком снижении слуха всегда начинаешь искать проблему не только в барабанной перепонке, но и в цепи слуховых косточек. На первый взгляд всё выглядело довольно типично — стандартный мезотимпанит (перфорация барабанной перепонки). Но если во вр…
❤7👍1custom 53976185534593177171custom 53979141331086277321
Сфабрикованные ссылки в научной литературе: аудит 2,5 миллиона статей Каждая ссылка в статье неявно утверждает, что источник существует и подтверждает высказанное положение; когда ссылка указывает на несуществующую работу, читатель, рецензент и составитель клинических рекомендаций лишаются возможности оценить доказательства. Сфабрикованные ссылки возникают сегодня главным образом из-за некритичного применения языко…
👍6❤3custom 53976185534593177172
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @spblor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЛОР-хирург Луппов Д.С.” (@spblor), 1,143 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spblor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.