Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SPC Division

Channel

SPC Division

@spc_division

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,159subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002102499841
TypeChannel
Username@spc_division
Created3 January 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/spc_division

Growth

1,1591,1641,161.57 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,161 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,160 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,164 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,161 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,158–1,165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 12:471,159-2
27 Aug 2026, 10:071,161-3
24 Aug 2026, 10:361,164+4
20 Aug 2026, 15:221,160-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:091,162+1
14 Aug 2026, 07:061,161-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:511,162-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:331,163no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:021,163first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

346 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13438.7%
🔥11633.5%
🫡3710.7%
custom 5377581083619513944246.94%
👍123.47%
custom 537742791649580170172.02%
custom 533700483106211062861.73%
😭61.73%
custom 537772839240783028930.867%
👎10.289%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 12 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spc_division. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC401 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Памʼятаємо кожного. Назавжди в строю 🫡 Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

🫡35😭6custom 53370048310621106286

22 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC954 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

17 років у справі! Представники SPC division у складі підрозділу БПС “КРИЛА" вітають всіх причетних з річницею колективу добіркою уражень ворожої техніки. З хоробрістю в душі! Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

23custom 53775810836195139446🔥4

15 Jun 2026, 08:28 UTC525 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нещодавно ми запустили сайт Благодійного Фонду "СІММЕРС" Наша мета – це подальше забезпечення діяльності підрозділу SPC Division, підтримка та супровід поранених бійців, благодійні проєкти, допомога сімʼям загиблих та інші громадські ініціативи Ми прагнемо зробити нашу діяльність максимально прозорою, тож додали "живе" оновлення фінансової звітності прямо на сайті. Плануємо й надалі розвивати цей напрямок, тож зал

15

25 May 2026, 12:04 UTC644 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Колись тут буде багато красивих уражень, які вже стали історією, але поки лише плівка з зимового полігону Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

🔥187

22 May 2026, 18:37 UTC524 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @analyticstu

У переддень виходу нового видання ми потроху викладаємо інтерв’ю з 7-го випуску. Адже специфіка таких розмов — це актуальність питань сьогодення. Минув рік, і тепер люди мають змогу ознайомитися з думками наших співрозмовників уже крізь призму часу. Тож наступний респондент — представник харківського «Металіста», наш давній друг і колега. Це інтерв’ю стало одним із найбільших на той момент, а також — одним із найцік

🔥137

22 May 2026, 18:31 UTC463 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вашій увазі пропонуємо інтервʼю з лідером нашого колективу Від себе додамо, що ті, хто знають цю людину поганого про неї ніколи не скажуть Тому радимо ознайомитись та трошки зазирнути за лаштунки картинки, яку ви можете бачити Посилання

14👍7

20 May 2026, 11:13 UTC448 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Повне відео про Монгола доступне за посиланням

🔥123

18 May 2026, 14:06 UTC478 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Assault_Battalion_1Video

Інструктор із бойовим досвідом, як у “Монгола”, — справжня знахідка. Завдяки безлічі зухвалих операцій у складі 1ШБ, одній з ключових ролей у “Бешкетниках Сірка” і глибокому розумінню сучасної війни, “Монгол” є, без перебільшення, легендою 92 ОШБр. ▶️ Повна версія 🤘 Збір на компоненти дронів 😎 Instagram 📱 TikTok 📱 Facebook 📱 YouTube

🔥216

6 May 2026, 15:00 UTC676 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сталевих — з їхнім днем. Піхота йде туди, куди інші бояться дивитись, та робить те, про що інші бояться думати. Піхота — надлюди. Не було б піхоти — не було б України. Зі святом Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

9👍3

4 May 2026, 11:27 UTC≈12,400 views62 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нове графіті в Харкові від нашого колективу з нагадуванням, що війна не зупиняється Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

44custom 537758108361951394412custom 53777283924078302893👍1👎1🫡1

13 Apr 2026, 11:04 UTC822 views36 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

🔥26custom 537758108361951394462👍1🫡1

10 Apr 2026, 05:06 UTC858 views33 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Підписатись 🇺🇦 Підтримати

🔥22custom 537742791649580170174

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @spc_division. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 919,768 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SPC Division” (@spc_division), 1,159 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spc_division.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.