Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,810–2,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 23:20
2,895
-2
12 Sept 2026, 14:42
2,897
+2
8 Sept 2026, 09:38
2,895
-1
3 Sept 2026, 14:17
2,896
+16
31 Aug 2026, 11:45
2,880
+8
28 Aug 2026, 03:29
2,872
+7
24 Aug 2026, 16:44
2,865
+3
21 Aug 2026, 05:08
2,862
+13
17 Aug 2026, 20:06
2,849
-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:56
2,850
+22
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
2,828
+7
6 Aug 2026, 08:20
2,821
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:06
2,821
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
250 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
109
43.6%
custom 5239989598678972356
59
23.6%
😁
30
12.0%
👀
21
8.40%
🔥
14
5.60%
👏
8
3.20%
😨
5
2.00%
👍
2
0.8%
👎
2
0.8%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ещё спрашивали по моим предиктам, дошли наконец руки
С фентези надо было сесть поразбираться, хотел ещё как-то просчитать, чо лучше поставить — в итоге Нико нанейрослопил небольшой сайтик, который выбор делает максимально простым
https://nicomac.github.io/ti-2026-fantasy-tool/
А с командами сложнее. Я хотел изначально сделать Pre-TI отчёт и большой пост в блог, попутно прикинуть, кто, как и чем играет и что от них …
Внезапный некоторый sneak peek к новой фиче, над которой идёт активная работа
https://esports.ru/dota-2/news/intervyu-s-leamare-o-prognozirovanii-mety-dota-2/
На сбор матчей обычно уходит где-то полтора суток нынче (титанчиков нынче многовато развелось), а новый сборщик матчей так и не нашлось времени перед интом протестить (вот так вот неожиданно пришлось перестраивать планы и над другими вещами работать).
Но думаю сделать доработку до конца недели, чтобы хотя бы часть матчей ловилась другим методом, а отчёт обновлялся чаще. Тогда текущий метод сбора матчей останется как…
Каждый год я думаю "Ну в этом году на инт звать не будут наверное"
Каждый раз в итоге приходит инвайт и мне надо в срочном порядке делать просто ДОХРЕНА всего до начала турнира. И заодно решать визовые вопросы.
Но хоть в этот раз с визами не надо ничего решать.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @spectraldota. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
sikle\dota.vpk @sikleqq · 24,028 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
Dota Today @dotatoday · 24,153 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Сельский Стас @malr1neDotes · 26,886 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Tundra Esports @TundraTribe · 28,872 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Глупости Анастейши @nastyamulla · 32,209 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
HULIGANI @L1GATEAM · 45,213 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Телега Маелшторма @maelstormone · 34,478 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
Старший по доте @korb3ndetka · 26,252 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
ULTIMATE Dota 2 @ultimatedota · 25,388 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
TORONTOTOKYO @torontotokyo · 23,445 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
Solo @solo_q_q · 56,567 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Spectral Leamare” (@spectraldota), 2,895 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spectraldota.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.