Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Speculator Guy

Channel

Speculator Guy

@speculator_guy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,920subscribers

-148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232212971
TypeChannel
Username@speculator_guy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/speculator_guy

Growth

6,9207,0686,9947 August 2026 — 7,068 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,067 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,051 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,037 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,016 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,994 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,970 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,958 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,943 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,931 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,920 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 27 days, net -148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,898–7,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 19:196,920-11
31 Aug 2026, 13:346,931-12
28 Aug 2026, 21:086,943-15
25 Aug 2026, 21:286,958-12
23 Aug 2026, 07:576,970-24
20 Aug 2026, 03:026,994-22
17 Aug 2026, 09:537,016-21
14 Aug 2026, 02:367,037-14
10 Aug 2026, 19:587,051-16
7 Aug 2026, 18:327,067-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:167,068first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 6,920 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held33 (22 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total16,720
Reactions total194
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

644 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24638.2%
😁19330.0%
🔥8413.0%
👍497.61%
🌭477.30%
🐳253.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 33 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @speculator_guy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC755 views10 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

А я же правильно розумію, що зараз усі інфли хто сидів все літо нічого не робив лише лутав за рекламу пішли писали пост про ріст бітка? Я, до речі, свою страту змінювати не буду, але просто додам деякі штуки, котрі абсолютно не будуть залежати від ціни активу, а лише буду шукати варіанти налутати на волатильності

😁72👍1

19 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC895 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Давайте поговоримо про Bullet Декілька місяців тому, одна дуже поважна мою людина, хто мене засадив в Aether, Carv, Ethena, шилив мені Vari та ще багато гемів на ерлі раунді вирішив мені зашилити Bullet Bullet - перп на солані з інвестом від Wintermute, Electric Capital, Jump та багато хто інших. Також там цікава команда, але СЕО доволі цікавий, бо він робив багато чого, але був у нього момент в карʼєрі коли він чи

😁5🌭2

17 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,070 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ітоги трейдинг сесії Скажу вам відверто, що вона пішла трохи не за планом, оскільки парсер на який я надіявся помер максимально оперативно, однак всередині неї ми пішли обговорювати те, де можна залутати у періоді найближчих 3-8 тижнів 1. Знайшли доволі цікавий спред між предиктами на 15%+ ( якщо заходити ліміткою + маркетом хедж) 2. Обсудили фарми фандингів, та знайшли звʼязку на 140% APR на BTC ( без урахування

😁10👍63🐳1

17 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,070 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Можливо хтось пропустив, але сьогодні проскочила новина, що Binance передала дані клієнта у справі про пожертви на підтримку України У відповідь на це Co-CEO Binance відповів відповіли, що працюють виключно з правоохоронними органами по всьому світу в рамках законних запитів та з урахуванням відповідних правових вимог залежно від їх законодавства Нажаль, не залежно від того яка це біржа, який це фінансовий інструме

😁82

17 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,070 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍5🐳1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,180 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Сам же колив вам, але пішов фармити активно лише вчора Насправді після гойдалок у лудні фарм фандосу виявляється настільки спокійним, що ви навіть не уявляєте Міг же просто заливатися з хеджем і лутати по пару соток в день, але ні, так не можна жеж 😁 Ладно, це все лірика, але $BTW досі фармить і за минулу добу накапало 0.98% на позу шорту, що дуже окей Імхо, можна ізі фармити і далі поки його не рагнуть, а там мо

👍5😁4

16 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,210 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Челендж v3.0 Я думаю що усі памʼятають як ми пройшли перший челендж від 1к до 20к і як зараз йдемо від 10к до м2, але подивившись на успіх мого товариша Богдана, кто зробив дуже крутий челендж я вирішив його відтворити у себе Тому тепер я буду робити 100 рілзів за 100 днів у інстаграмі Мені вже набридло розповідати 24/7 про крипту, тому там буде і про фінанси, і про інвести, аішку і будемо говорити про багато ціка

🔥17😁63🐳1

16 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,270 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Торгові сесії Speculator Pro Той хто залишається на місці - помирає, тому я вирішив тестувати нові напрямки і спробую себе в арбітражі предікнш маркетів Гроші у цьому напрямку 100% є, але треба швидкість, холоднокровність та досвід, котрий будемо набувати разом Спеціально під це у Speculator Pro я вирішив проводити торгові сесії, де максимально швидко та оперативно будемо намагатися наторговати на булку з маком О

🌭4🔥32🐳1👍1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,440 views32 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026

Не помиляється той, хто нічого не робить Я капітулював по AKE. Частину закривав раніше, частину зараз Вийшло багато, як і від депо так і від челенджа. Озвучувати не буду, бо знаю що ви підете лише задушите в коментах Висновки зроблені, в осені заробимо більше 🤝

16😁9🌭6👍1

11 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈2,040 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Риночок По інсті дуже видно, що хто побідніше їде на міконос, а хто побагаче тусується в Одесі, але доповідаю що бачу на зараз Біток та інше аналізувати не буду, там вже третій місяць просто йде розпил графіку і аналізувати просто нічого З цікавого: 1. Можете пофармити фандос на $BTW. Там стабільно капає 0.4-0.7% в день на позу, що доволі ок 2. Слідкую за $VELVET, виглядає графік так, що можуть дати спредик. Не

7🌭2🐳1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,600 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мекка фармерів Знаю що багато з вас хочуть мати пасивний дохідз крипти, але не хочуть фармити фандос, торгувати лочитися у пули, чи займатися чимось активним, але тут гуляв по твітеру, та побачив, що усім відомий 1inch змогли зробити таку штуку як Aqua Aqua це така тулза від 1inch, завдяки якому вам не потрібно морозити ваші токени у пулах, а ви можете тримати їх у себе на гаманці і заливати у пари лише тоді, коли

8😁2🐳1

9 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,480 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

По плеях на сьогодні по фулу зміг відпрацювати TUT, але я фул задоволенний 1. Зловив найс шорт на Gate, котрий планувався як спред у 100%+ 2. Зловив спред Binance/Gate на відскоку під 5.44% 3. Зловив Gate spot/ Bitget під 17.5% спред Сумарно до челенджу +273$ Звісно що колив все тут, але навіть з лоу сайзами імхо день вийшов не поганий, але з понеділдика вриваюсь у ворк, бо бачу що є куди ще можна залетіти не у

🔥92😁2🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @speculator_guy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Speculator Guy” (@speculator_guy), 6,920 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/speculator_guy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.